RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Michael Giagnocavo
terisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:50:31 -0600 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT > I'll agree with that sentence. There are many times when even STUN and > so on > isn't going to help. In Guatemala, a lot of peopl

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Brian Capouch
Eric Wieling wrote: I have a question for you: - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" Do you agree with this sentence? Complete and utter crap (if you assume a few things). SIP w/NAT works just fine if: . . . . Hardly "complete and utter crap" when it has to be followed by a laundry list of ex

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Charles S. Antrim
ate: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:50:31 -0600 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT > I'll agree with that sentence. There are many times when even STUN and > so on > isn't going to help. In Guatemala, a lot of people end up with private > IPs, > behind two NATs, etc. I've seen t

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Michael Giagnocavo
ium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT Hi All, I have a question for you: - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" Do you agree with this sentence? regards César ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lis

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Eric Wieling
I have a question for you: - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" Do you agree with this sentence? Complete and utter crap (if you assume a few things). SIP w/NAT works just fine if: Asterisk itself is not behind NAT You do not want to use SIP reinvites You use some form of NAT Keepalive*

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread César Davi Ávila do Nascimento
Thanks a lot! Regards César - Original Message - From: "Rich Adamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT > > I have a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Rich Adamson
> I have a question for you: > > - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" > > Do you agree with this sentence? Depends. Asterisk behind a nat box tends to be an implementation problem limited by the knowledge of the person doing the implementation and somewhat by the functionality implemented w

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread Duane
César Davi Ávila do Nascimento wrote: Hi All, I have a question for you: - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" Do you agree with this sentence? Depends on the NAT/firewall in question, you can also alleviate some of these issues using STUN and sip proxing... -- Best regards, Duane http://www

[Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread César Davi Ávila do Nascimento
Hi All, I have a question for you: - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well" Do you agree with this sentence? regards César ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UN

[Asterisk-Users] SIP x NAT

2005-01-31 Thread César Davi Ávila do Nascimento
Hi All,   I have a question for you:   - "SIP doesn't work behind NAT very well"   Do you agree with this sentence?   regards   César ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-use