Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Ricardo Villa
t: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:08 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal > I'd still vote for phpbb. > Then we could have catagories. > Hardware > Digim > Cisco > Other > Software > Scripts > ... > Wish List > ... > Services > Activ

RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Steven Critchfield
Critchfield > > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal > > > > > > With the increased traffic as of late, I'm wondering if it is time to > > split the list again. Specifically I am w

RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Andy Hester
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven > Critchfield > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 10:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal > > > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:25, Andy H

[Asterisk-Users] List proposal - Asterick-Proessional

2003-08-14 Thread John Schmerold
It would be interesting to me to see a list where * professionals crow about their successful installations & end users could request proposals. These kind of emails aren't generally welcome in a technical list like this, but would be appropriate in a list designed for the task. Should have re

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread James Taylor
I'd still vote for phpbb. Then we could have catagories. Hardware Digim Cisco Other Software Scripts ... Wish List ... Services Active Gateways Commercial Networks We can still be all part of this big Asterisk "community" but sorting through it is easier.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Meyers
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 12:25, Steven Critchfield wrote: > With the increased traffic as of late, I'm wondering if it is time to > split the list again. Specifically I am wondering if it should be split > along the various VoIP protocols and zap hardware, then leave a general > list that does configu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Andy Powell
I was pondering on this question, and have to agree, splitting mailing list just means yet another list to join (since there may one day be something relavant) and filter locally. What might appear to be a good solution is a privately run newsgroup on a digium server eg news.digium.com the gr

RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-14 Thread Andy Hester
PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven > Critchfield > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal > > > With the increased traffic as of late, I'm wondering if it is time to > split the li

[Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-12 Thread Steven Critchfield
With the increased traffic as of late, I'm wondering if it is time to split the list again. Specifically I am wondering if it should be split along the various VoIP protocols and zap hardware, then leave a general list that does configuration other than VoIP related? The hope is that those asking

RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-12 Thread Steve Meyers
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:31, Steven Critchfield wrote: > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:25, Andy Hester wrote: > > Perhaps there is another way to cut down on increased traffic... > > > > Specifically, I would go back to the suggestion of a collaborative website > > for documentation. Collecting info a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-11 Thread Chris Hirsch
What about a wiki? I personally don't like forums because I prefer the content pushed onto me and then let Mozilla do its magic with sorting and stuff. When I do have a problem however I first do a google unless there is a wiki present. Nine times out of ten, when users can post their own answe

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-11 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Saturday 09 August 2003 09:49, Senad Jordanovic wrote: > I agree as well... phpbb is much better solution. I disagree. There are thousands of phpbb boards out there, some of which I've been to, whose topics interest me. If the board stays open in my browser, I'll read it, but I rarely go back

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-10 Thread WipeOut .
My concern with wanting to split the list into so many mini-lists is that some will die from lack of membership and it will mean that people with problems in that area will be left in the cold.. Similar to how so many news groups just sit there unused now days.. If there is really a need to spl

RE: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-10 Thread Senad Jordanovic
I agree as well... phpbb is much better solution. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Taylor Sent: 09 August 2003 15:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal I'd still vote for phpbb. Then we could

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-10 Thread John Schmerold
sift thru partial solutions. I get around this issue by issuing the inurl:2003 directive, but sorting by date would be nice. - Original Message - From: "Andy Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:08 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-09 Thread James H. Thompson
ow forum members to post messages to newsgroups and mailing lists via the forum. Jim James H. Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Senad Jordanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 4:49 AM Subject: RE

RE: [Asterisk-Users] List proposal - Asterick-Proessional

2003-08-09 Thread Devon Henderson
rules. - Devon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Schmerold Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] List proposal - Asterick-Proessional It would be interesting to me to see a list where * pro

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list proposal

2003-08-09 Thread Iain Stevenson
I think that's a very good idea. When I started to become active in * last December the list was much less congested and Mark usually responded to requests, comments and patches within a few hours. Now things are clearly taking off - good for * and Digium but it's sort of losing the community