Re: [asterisk-users] {top|bottom|interleaved} posting, once again

2010-02-08 Thread Will Payne
On 6 Feb 2010, at 19:17, Philipp Kempgen wrote: Actually bottom-posting without trimming anything (SCNR) is about as annoying as top-posting. Yup, at least with bottom-posting, you might be reminded to trim down the included text. Top-posters are, IMHO, the worst for adding a single line

Re: [asterisk-users] {top|bottom|interleaved} posting, once again

2010-02-06 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Steve Edwards schrieb: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Michelle Dupuis wrote: [snip] Oh wait, the advent of computers has allowed us to conveniently insert the most recent text at the TOP of a message, to prevent people from having to reread the same stuff every time. A: Because we read from top

Re: [asterisk-users] {top|bottom|interleaved} posting, once again

2010-02-06 Thread Ira
At 11:17 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote: Actually bottom-posting without trimming anything (SCNR) is about as annoying as top-posting. Interleaved posting is fine, quoting just enough text so everyone can understand the context. Seems to me if you trim so that only the minimum amount is left it hardly

Re: [asterisk-users] {top|bottom|interleaved} posting, once again

2010-02-06 Thread Erik de Wild: Tripple-o
Funny that a small matter like top | bottom | interleaved posting can lead to a situation that is referred to as a fight . I agree with Ira that keeping all the original lines in place is very annoying when there are more lines then needed to pick up the discussion. I seem to be a top