Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
I am fairly certain he was simply reporting the results (for posterity) of
the event having already happened. Good to know (I guess?) that such
small hardware can acheive the performance that was squeezed out
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
Lol , simply lol, don't forget the super duper, top secret patch
,everyone is hiding from you that makes asterisk able to do 4000 calls
on a p3,
PS. don't tell anyone i said
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Erick
Perez
Sent: June-20-09 9:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu
power
So what happened to the OP? Seems he would be eager to help us fight the
swine flu...
--
Christopher Stamper
Email: christopherstam...@gmail.com
Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype: cdstamper
___
-- Bandwidth and
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Erick Perez wrote:
Jeff, indeed i was posting for posterity. Maybe someone will benefit in an
outbound-only scenario that he/she will not need a supercomputer to pump a
20sec audio clip.
Again, this was a public service. And indeed TV and radio was used. Unless
you live
I am fairly certain he was simply reporting the results (for posterity) of
the event having already happened. Good to know (I guess?) that such
small hardware can acheive the performance that was squeezed out of it.
Impressive.
All THAT said, I am unconvinced that there was no sales effort
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:40:53PM -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
I totally agree with you Jeff, however some of us do not actually sell
viagra over the phone.
This is a campaign to spread a message to the population about the health
prevention steps that should be taken in order to prevent
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:40:53PM -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
I totally agree with you Jeff, however some of us do not actually sell
viagra over the phone.
This is a campaign to spread a message to the population about the health
prevention steps that
-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: April-02-09 10:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
My only
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 22:46 -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
So if we use the 40MHZ rule, we are talking about 40*400=16000MHZ or
1.6Ghz.
It's been my experience that CPU load of Asterisk don't scale linearly
with call volume. I don't pretend to understand all the reasons why,
but it probably has a
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Erick Perez wrote:
We are planning to run an outbound only campaign. A 20-second voice message
will be played to callers and our dialer on machine1 will send to
machine2-asterisk (1.4) instructions to dial 400 calls, play the message and
hang up. This will be done for
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Gordon Henderson wrote:
As for the server - get *everything* in RAM. At least with no disk IO,
This is true with respect to e.g. recordings.
But most other operations won't bother the disk much. If you have 400
channels doing roughly the same things,
My only comment is that I am having moral issues with assisting anyone
that is planning to call one million phone numbers to play a message and
hang up. Doesn't sound like an opt-in kind of campaign to me. When
such a thing happens to me on my home phone I get extremely angry.
j
On Wed,
, April 02, 2009 9:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
My only comment is that I am having moral issues with assisting anyone
that is planning to call one million phone numbers to play a message
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
My only comment is that I am having
] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
My only comment is that I am having moral issues with assisting anyone
that is planning to call one million phone numbers to play a message and
hang up. Doesn't sound like an opt-in kind of campaign to me. When
such a thing happens to me on my home phone
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: April-02-09 10:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 400 calls at g711 how much cpu power
My only comment is that I am having moral
We are planning to run an outbound only campaign. A 20-second voice message
will be played to callers and our dialer on machine1 will send to
machine2-asterisk (1.4) instructions to dial 400 calls, play the message and
hang up. This will be done for about 1 million phones.
The asterisk box will
Asterisk max call estimation doesn't scale linearly ... it might in the future
with some fixes they're adding.
For your application you could use some other open PBX that is known not to have
'Asterisk' limitations.
Anyways most people will tell you to simply buy a box and make a test.
Noone
19 matches
Mail list logo
