Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution

2009-10-21 Thread Danny Nicholas
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution Hi Steve, Thanks for your reply. I am using only asterisk code (dial plan) in extensions.conf which also includes connection to the database: like exten =n,1

Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution

2009-10-21 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: Not my cup of tea, but I think I'd be trying an ODBC connection to reduce some overhead here. [snip] Does that reduce overhead or add it? Seems that direct mysql-client code should be more efficient than adding ODBC in the middle... j

Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution

2009-10-21 Thread Danny Nicholas
calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: Not my cup of tea, but I think I'd be trying an ODBC connection to reduce some overhead here. [snip] Does that reduce overhead or add it? Seems that direct mysql-client code should be more

Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution

2009-10-21 Thread Matt Riddell
On 22/10/09 9:16 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: Not my cup of tea, but I think I'd be trying an ODBC connection to reduce some overhead here. [snip] Does that reduce overhead or add it? Seems that direct mysql-client code should be more

Re: [asterisk-users] Concurrent calls including mysql taking lot oftime for execution

2009-10-21 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 15:16:31 Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: Not my cup of tea, but I think I'd be trying an ODBC connection to reduce some overhead here. [snip] Does that reduce overhead or add it? Seems that direct mysql-client code should