They used to have solaris on the Digium FTP site but they seem to be gone now :(
On the free codec site they have some complied with icc and others
with gcc4 so I don't see why you can't get this working with gcc on
solaris.
On Jan 15, 2008 4:01 AM, Bruce McAlister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 7:50 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, buying the license is the right thing to do unless you live where
software patent laws are not applicable.
Totally agree.
I have bought many more licenses from asterisk than I've ever used,
Steve Totaro wrote:
I would suggest building it yourself
(http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs/doc-svn6.txt
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs/doc-svn6.txt). It is
not that difficult and ensures that it should be compatible with your
machine. Just a little
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
They used to have solaris on the Digium FTP site but they seem to be gone now
:(
On the free codec site they have some complied with icc and others
with gcc4 so I don't see why you can't get this working with gcc on
solaris.
If you can, be sure to submit it to
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
They used to have solaris on the Digium FTP site but they seem to be gone now
:(
On the free codec site they have some complied with icc and others
with gcc4 so I don't see why you can't get this working with gcc on
solaris.
Digium do still have the Solaris
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:05:35AM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 7:50 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, buying the license is the right thing to do unless you live where
software patent laws are not applicable.
Totally agree.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:08:33AM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote:
If there was an equivalent free codec that provided good quality audio
with such high compression and was widely supported, then I'd use it.
Help make speex widely supported. Or continue to suffer with g729 and
g723.
--
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:05:35AM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 7:50 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, buying the license is the right thing to do unless you live where
software patent laws are not applicable.
On Jan 15, 2008 12:57 AM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 7:50 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would argue that it is illegal. The main definition of illegal is
1.
against law: contravening a specific law, especially a criminal law.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:08:33AM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote:
If there was an equivalent free codec that provided good quality audio
with such high compression and was widely supported, then I'd use it.
Help make speex widely supported. Or continue to suffer with
Ok, let's just agree to disagree and say that using patented software
without a patent license is wrong
What I am saying is you can be sued to the poorhouse but you won't be
arrested and put in jail.
On Jan 15, 2008 7:55 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 12:57 AM,
Asterisk 1.2.24 seems to crash repeatedly under any substantial call load
(and sometimes without a substantial call load - just one SIP leg is
enough to do it) when using the G.729 pre-compiled binaries from:
http://asterisk.hosting.lv/
As per:
On Jan 14, 2008 5:09 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asterisk 1.2.24 seems to crash repeatedly under any substantial call load
(and sometimes without a substantial call load - just one SIP leg is
enough to do it) when using the G.729 pre-compiled binaries from:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
I would suggest building it yourself (
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs/doc-svn6.txt). It is not
that difficult and ensures that it should be compatible with your
machine. Just a little work.
That was what I initially tried to do,
On Jan 14, 2008 5:55 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
I would suggest building it yourself (
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs/doc-svn6.txt). It is
not
that difficult and ensures that it should be compatible with your
On Jan 14, 2008 5:51 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either that or pay for the legal licensing of G729 and get support through
the appropriate channels. Using the code for anything other than learning
purposes is illegal, not to mention that licensing is quite inexpensive.
Using
On Jan 14, 2008 6:54 PM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 5:51 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Either that or pay for the legal licensing of G729 and get support
through
the appropriate channels. Using the code for anything other than
learning
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 07:50:22PM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:54 PM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how many Chinese VoIP phones with G729 G723 codecs have
actually licensed the codec?
Probably none.
Well, they sell in the US and in other countries.
On Jan 14, 2008 7:50 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would argue that it is illegal. The main definition of illegal is 1.
against law: contravening a specific law, especially a criminal law.
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/illegal.html
Illegal means that something violates
19 matches
Mail list logo
