Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-09-03 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Davies wrote: > In fact the current behaviour makes perfect sense as it results in > last-minute transcoding, and utilises the fact that Asterisk may know > better about the capabilities of an onward link than the originator's > phone! By specifying g729/ilbc, you are saying that g729 is bet

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-09-03 Thread Steve Davies
2008/9/3 Jim Boykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Brent/Steve, Thanks for the answer. Point here is that asterisk > already knows about first leg and the codec so shouldn't it select the > best codec for second leg to match first leg. Instead asterisk is > selecting first codec in order. > > To illustrate

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-09-03 Thread Jim Boykin
Brent/Steve, Thanks for the answer. Point here is that asterisk already knows about first leg and the codec so shouldn't it select the best codec for second leg to match first leg. Instead asterisk is selecting first codec in order. To illustrate, if the first leg was ilbc and second leg supports

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-08-22 Thread Brent Davidson
Steve Totaro wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Jim Boykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We run asterisk to handle incoming DIDs and we have observed inefficient Codec Translation. Here is the scenario [DID Vendor] ---> [Asterisk ] > Externa

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-08-22 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Jim Boykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We run asterisk to handle incoming DIDs and we have observed > inefficient Codec Translation. > > Here is the scenario > > [DID Vendor] ---> [Asterisk ] > > External GW [G729] >

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-08-22 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Jim Boykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We run asterisk to handle incoming DIDs and we have observed > inefficient Codec Translation. > > Here is the scenario > > [DID Vendor] ---> [Asterisk ] > > External GW [G729] >

Re: [asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-08-22 Thread Jim Boykin
Requesting help. Thaks On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jim Boykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We run asterisk to handle incoming DIDs and we have observed > inefficient Codec Translation. > > Here is the scenario > > [DID Vendor] ---> [Asterisk ] > -

[asterisk-users] Inefficient Codec Translation

2008-08-19 Thread Jim Boykin
We run asterisk to handle incoming DIDs and we have observed inefficient Codec Translation. Here is the scenario [DID Vendor] ---> [Asterisk ] > External GW [G729] | |---