On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
This would work:
~~
Codegen case:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811182566
Thermaltake power supply:
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec_v2.asp?scriteria=BA23480
Motherboard:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use AMD though, but right now,
power consumption is an issue and hen AMD's low
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use AMD though, but right now,
power
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:10, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:00:38AM +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Doug wrote:
Interesting shopping list - I've just built a new server for my co-lo and
it's an Intel Atom mobo. Normally I do use
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
1- Using Intel CPU or AMD
2- Use 32 or 64 bits
Can you help me please
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
1- Using Intel CPU or
-users] Intel Vs AMD
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to have
the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
1
2009/2/22 Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.netgordon%2baster...@drogon.net
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to
have
the
what is asterisk IMO?
Asterisk, I think you know.
IMO is a common E-Mail/Newsgroup abbreviation that means In My Opinion--similar
to another one IMHO (Humble).
Wilton
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
At 12:33 2/22/2009, michel freiha wrote:
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP
calls...My next step is to choose the best hardware that I should
use i order to have the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices
for my hardware (CPU)...
1- Using Intel CPU or AMD
Doug wrote:
At 12:33 2/22/2009, michel freiha wrote:
Hi all,
I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP
calls...My next step is to choose the best hardware that I should
use i order to have the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices
for my hardware (CPU)...
1-
-users] intel vs amd motherboards
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time,
you
should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
matter
whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a small
Asterisk.
In the world of asterisk
As we are talking about pbx boxes (for large office/enterprises/ maybe ITSP?)
i think we are using server grade boxes (like hp ml3xx or bigger)
I have some servers with fan on cpu heatsink, but most of them are using
only heatsink on cpu, and redundant fans.
I think, we need some real life
ooops,
sorry, you right, forgot to mention it...
It was to be compared with AMD 64.
Olivier
C F a écrit :
Olivier can you please do a cat /proc/cpuinfo and post it here? I
think you have a 64 bit cpu.
On 7/9/06, olivier.taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:56:49PM -0400, C F wrote:
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
'show translations' is done by a loop that for each pair of codecs
meassures the time it takes to convert a relatively short ammount of
data between the two.
Thus each conversion is
PROTECTED] nombre de C F
Enviado el: Domingo, 09 de Julio de 2006 06:57 p.m.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
transcoded channels using show transalation?
In the case where it tells me 17 ms
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
But my question is, those that mean that it will take 1 second to
convert 50 channels? if so do I get a 1 second latency when coverting
50 channels?
On 7/10/06, Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
On 7/7/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:32:04PM -0400, C F wrote:
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:07:16AM -0400, C F wrote:
Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
In the ideal case you'll get double performance with two CPUs. In
theory.
A case of many concurrent calls is basically something
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz performance below
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex
ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - -
-
gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 4 10 29
14
ulaw - 2 - 1 2 2 1 4 10 29
14
alaw - 2 1 - 2 2 1 4 10 29
14
g726 - 2 2 2 - 2 1 4 10 29
14
adpcm - 2 2 2 2 - 1 4 10 29
14
slin
Olivier can you please do a cat /proc/cpuinfo and post it here? I
think you have a 64 bit cpu.
On 7/9/06, olivier.taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz performance below
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - -
Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
transcoded channels using show transalation?
In the case where it tells me 17 ms for encoding and 4 for decoding,
that gives me 21ms per channel, in what time frame
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:32:04PM -0400, C F wrote:
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the same even though the AMD had 2
HDDs. Here are the show
day.
-Original Message-
From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:58 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:32:04PM -0400, C F wrote:
I have recently build 2
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:15:35AM -0700, shadowym wrote:
I do know that the P4 core has a much longer pipeline (20 instructions?)
than the AMD. That is not good for a real time application and that is one
of the reasons AMD cpu's are able to do more with less clock cycles.
Cool! The AMD
-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
cat /proc/cpuinfo on amd:
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 47
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz
Patrick wrote:
snip
AMD's Opteron has more FPU power than Intel. FPU power is needed when
you do a lot of transcoding. So there is a difference besides AMD
being
cheaper.
Regards,
Patrick
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:32 PM, varun wrote:
Thanks Patrick,
That is useful info for future.
Actually it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:00 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
If you want to handle
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time,
you
should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
matter
whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a small
Asterisk
: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the same even though the AMD had 2
HDDs. Here are the show translations from both
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed the same even
p.m.
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
I have recently build 2 machines, one with an Intel Pentium Dual Core
CPU, and one SATA HDD, and the other with a single AMD 64 bit CPU, and
a RAID 1 w 2 SATA HDD. Both costed
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or
AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited if at
all there is difference ?
And if I were to use AMD platform then
any issues if I were to use a 64bit arch.
Most good boards seem to be for 64bit.
My
Hello Varun,
varun wrote:
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or
AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited if at
all there is difference ?
And if I were to use AMD platform then
any issues if I were to use a 64bit arch.
Most good
-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Hello Varun,
varun wrote:
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or AMD based system ?
Which platform is better suited if at
all
Don wrote:
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time,
you should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
matter whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a
small Asterisk.
In the world of asterisk...Intel or AMD really doesn't
you chose to shove in it...
- Original Message -
From: Kai Fürstenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks Don,
Just read something about asterisk sound
and mmx working better. So I got a little
confused.
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
If you want to handle
Thanks Kai,
Wether 32 bit or 64bit does it make a difference
for asterisk ?
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:47 +0200, Kai Fürstenberg wrote:
Hello Varun,
varun wrote:
Hello,
I want to setup a small asterisk PBX.
Should I use an Intel based system or
AMD based system ?
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time, you
should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't matter
whether you use Intel or AMD, because you said it will be a small Asterisk.
In the world of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
Thanks Don,
Just read something about asterisk sound
and mmx working better
Thanks Patrick,
That is useful info for future.
Varun
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:15 +0200, Patrick wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:00 -0400, Don wrote:
If you want to handle, lets say 1000 calls or more at the same time, you
should of course use a better processor. In my opinion, it doesn't
43 matches
Mail list logo
