Two very simple solution for your problem:
1-Port redirection in iptables. This I have used for a year or plus and it
worked fine for me. I have redirected 1000 ports to a single port 5060 in
iptables and it worked smooth.
2-There is a script in asterisk source directory to compile portable
On 07/19/2011 01:07 PM, Michael wrote:
We would like Asterisk to listen on port 5060 and on an additional port.
From what we read online, it's not really possible, so is it possible to
install a separate instance of Asterisk on the same machine (without
using Vmware or such) and set the 2nd
On 07/19/2011 02:15 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Actually, you can do this with one installation of Asterisk, and a
separate set of config files and data directories. When the Asterisk
executable is started, the '-C' option can be used to point to an
asterisk.conf file; that file can then tell
On 07/19/2011 01:16 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 07/19/2011 02:15 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Actually, you can do this with one installation of Asterisk, and a
separate set of config files and data directories. When the Asterisk
executable is started, the '-C' option can be used to point to an
@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple Asterisk Sessions on same machine
On 07/19/2011 01:16 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 07/19/2011 02:15 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Actually, you can do this with one installation of Asterisk, and a
separate set of config files and data
On 7/19/2011 2:07 PM, Michael wrote:
We would like Asterisk to listen on port 5060 and on an additional port.
From what we read online, it's not really possible, so is it possible to
if you're running iptables, you can set up a pretty simple rule to
forward your additional port to 5060.
On 07/19/2011 02:25 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
On 7/19/2011 2:07 PM, Michael wrote:
We would like Asterisk to listen on port 5060 and on an additional
port.
From what we read online, it's not really possible, so is it
possible to
if you're running iptables, you can set up a pretty simple rule
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.comwrote:
You'd use something from the OpenSER/Kamailio/OpenSIPS family. Those are
actual proxies.
We'll try that, if it's not too complicated. Thanks.
--
On 2011-07-19 20:07, Michael wrote:
Hello,
We would like Asterisk to listen on port 5060 and on an additional
port. From what we read online, it's not really possible, so is it
possible to install a separate instance of Asterisk on the same
machine (without using Vmware or such) and set the
Hi,
so is it possible to install a separate instance of Asterisk on the same
machine (without using Vmware or such) and set the 2nd instance to
listen on another port?
you might try it with Xen as virtualisation solution, because especially
when using it with Linux as paravirtualised guest, it
On 07/19/2011 04:33 PM, Thorolf Godawa wrote:
Hi,
so is it possible to install a separate instance of Asterisk on the same
machine (without using Vmware or such) and set the 2nd instance to
listen on another port?
you might try it with Xen as virtualisation solution, because especially
when
On 7/19/11 11:07 AM, Michael wrote:
We would like Asterisk to listen on port 5060 and on an additional port. From
what
we read online, it's not really possible, so is it possible to install a
separate
instance of Asterisk on the same machine (without using Vmware or such) and set
the 2nd
Hi all
i have a scenario where i have 2 DSL lines (i know its not that reliable but
it fits the bill) connected to 1 box and would like my isp to round robin
between both dsl (to allow for more capacity - each dsl could get me thru
about 16-18 calls and i need about 30
incoming sip gets routed
Hi,
If u want to setup for 4500 or more phone then better to user OpenSER +
Asterisk.
OpenSER easily work for 10,000 calls.
You need to setup one server for OpenSER and all phone register on this
server. You need to write routing logic in OpenSER server to call connect
and if u need to play
Thnaks a Lot.
So i will look for openser integration with asterisk!
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:12 AM, RAJNIKANT VANZA rajniva...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
If u want to setup for 4500 or more phone then better to user OpenSER +
Asterisk.
OpenSER easily work for 10,000 calls.
You
True, we had setup before openser with asterisk and it works great. I
have wrote small document on voip-info related my project.
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thnaks a Lot.
So i will look for openser integration with
Can you post later t he link for it ?
I read alot that page.
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
True, we had setup before openser with asterisk and it works great. I have
wrote small document on voip-info related my project.
--
Sent
Don't expect lots of thing because I have just post my basic config
and method to integrate openser with asterisk and I did that 3 year ago.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+and+OpenSER+integration.
I would say search on google today lots of material are there and I
have
Thanks!
Would apreciate the book!
But i am already researching
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.comwrote:
Don't expect lots of thing because I have just post my basic config and
method to integrate openser with asterisk and I did that 3 year ago.
I have sent you book in PM.
-S
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:39:56 -0300
From: sf.ri...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple Asterisk
Thanks!
Would apreciate the book!
But i am already researching
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM
-users] Multiple Asterisk
Thanks!
Would apreciate the book!
But i am already researching
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.comwrote:
Don't expect lots of thing because I have just post my basic config and
method to integrate openser with asterisk
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple Asterisk
Thanks!
Would apreciate the book!
But i am already researching
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Satish Patel satish...@hotmail.comwrote:
Don't expect lots of thing because I have just post my basic config and
method to integrate
protocol then you can easily play
with config file and achieve your goal
Best Of luck..
-S
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:55:50 -0300
From: sf.ri...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple Asterisk
Thanks i got it
Another think you may know.
Openser have
No one ?
Other thing, i was reading about asterisk realtime, it can be configured to
have multiple asterisk conectted to the same database? But how would it know
in wich host are the number??
Thanks!
[]'sf.rique
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.comwrote:
I
Here is a better link for DUNDi
http://exain.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/asterisk-basics-and-load-balancing-via-dundi/
skip the part which you know already
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.comwrote:
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Paul Belanger
I am reading about, and some people are saying that openser is better for
biger envoriments, and dundi is fine for smal envoriments, does anyone have
any info about it ?
We have now about 4500 convencional phones and we gonna expand a lot.
So,
OpenSER vs DUNDi ?
I guess i will use Asterisk
Helo folks.
I am new with asterisk, so please be patient with me!
First of all, Where i am working we gonna try an pilot project to see if we
are able to change our all PABX and VOIP system to an open source. We
atually are using an proprietary one.
We have a big envoriment. So we need multiple
On 11-03-15 06:19 PM, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
Have many diferenet locations that have convencional phones that need to
call others locations with convencional phones. And we can not change this,
I was reading and asterisk cannot handle it self this kind of setup, it
needs an separated serrver
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.comwrote:
On 11-03-15 06:19 PM, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
Have many diferenet locations that have convencional phones that need to
call others locations with convencional phones. And we can not change
this,
I was
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the proper way to approach it but i can't figure out
how to setup dundi.
what i did is, i try to determine which server a user is registered, by calling
an agi to query the realtime db and capture the regserver of the user.
e.g.
exten =
I'm not sure if this is the proper way to approach it but i can't figure out
how to setup dundi.
what i did is, i try to determine which server a user is registered, by
calling an agi to query? the realtime db and capture the regserver of? the
user.
e.g.?
exten =
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:18 PM, JR Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use DUNDi, perfect for this. The protocol is very light, no load on
the servers to run it, can handle hundreds of queries a second with no
load. You want to use regcontext and a few other things to make it
all work
Hi Ken -
The SIP.CONF has been made identical across all 3 remote locations, and the
main server has the same config for each remote site connecting.
I first want to confirm that it's possible to have 3 remote Asterisk servers
setup as a SIP client connected to a 4th Asterisk server.
I just
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple Asterisk SIP Server/client
connections
Hi Ken -
The SIP.CONF has been made identical across all 3 remote locations,
and the main server has the same config for each remote site
connecting.
I first want to confirm that it's possible
I have 4 asterisk servers. They all have local phones on their local
network they manage for SIP based conversations. We then have IAX
between them all for inter-asterisk connections.
This setup has worked well for nearly 2 years now, minor problems here
and there but overall very nice.
Hi guys,
I currently have about 10 Asterisk servers scattered around the place
each hosting their own dynamic conference centre. Is there any way that
when people join these conference centres on each server that somehow
Asterisk bridges the conference centres on each server to form one large
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Klaverstyn, David C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently have about 10 Asterisk servers scattered around the place each
hosting their own dynamic conference centre. Is there any way that when
people join these conference centres on each server that somehow
Hi there, Im wondering, is it possible to have single GUI on same DB but write to different asterisk server? Means assuming you have 3 asterisk server with same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it write to different asterisk server conf files. where is the connection that we should
On 15:52, Thu 28 Sep 06, Sharon Lim wrote:
Hi there,
Im wondering, is it possible to have single GUI on same DB but write to
different asterisk server? Means assuming you have 3 asterisk server with
same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it write to different
asterisk server
Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 15:52, Thu 28 Sep 06, Sharon Lim wrote:
Hi there,
Im wondering, is it possible to have single GUI on same DB but write
to different asterisk server? Means assuming you have 3 asterisk
server with same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it
write to
Subject: [asterisk-users] Multiple
asterisk same GUI
Hi there, Im wondering, is it possible to have single
GUI on same DB but write to different asterisk server? Means assuming you have
3 asterisk server with same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it
write to different
: [asterisk-users] Multiple
asterisk same GUI
Hi there, Im wondering, is it possible to have single
GUI on same DB but write to different asterisk server? Means assuming you have
3 asterisk server with same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it
write to different asterisk
On 18 Apr 2006, at 03:20, stevanus wrote:
Hmm...my output for getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION is NPTL 2.3.4..
I don't know what it's mean anyway :P
And for Lee, I'm configuring my asterisk through amp (now freepbx),
but I do some custom configuration manually too ;)
I guess Paul is right,
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 08:29 +0100, Tim Panton wrote:
I'd guess you have a startup script for asterisk that is setting the
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment variable.
To check, find the 'main' asterisk process id (almost always the
lowest numbered asterisk process)
then look (as root) in the
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 08:29 +0100, Tim Panton wrote:
I'd guess you have a startup script for asterisk that is setting the
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment variable.
To check, find the 'main' asterisk process id (almost always
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem?
Is it really a problem?
I'm on a
2.6 kernel so any more ideas?
Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 in the asterisk script?
2006 09:27
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem?
Is it really a problem?
I'm on a
2.6 kernel so any
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:33 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Yes it is a problem cos after a while of just leaving it the system is
unable to make calls out via the PSTN, which is why I have spent time
with the telco, more like wasted time, and played with zaptel's make
options. After trying a
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem?
Is it really a problem?
I'm on a
2.6 kernel so any more ideas
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Cotton
Sent: 18 April 2006 10:02
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:33 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Yes it is a problem cos after a while
On 18 Apr 2006, at 09:27, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem?
Is it really a problem?
I'm on a
2.6 kernel so any more ideas?
Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the
export
Hi,
Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday?
When I do ps aux, I got this:
asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06:00 13:18 asterisk
-vvvg -c
asterisk 23558 0.0 5.1 26040 12248 ? S09:57 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
asterisk 29832 0.0 5.1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stevanus
Sent: 17 April 2006 10:10
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Hi,
Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times
10:10
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Hi,
Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday?
When I do ps aux, I got this:
asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06:00 13:18
2006 10:10
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Hi,
Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday?
When I do ps aux, I got this:
asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:12 +0200, Paul Hewlett wrote:
This is incorrect. Asterisk is a multithreaded system but how the threads
are handled by the OS depends on the version of threads that is being used.
For Linuxthreads (kernel 2.4), one would see a separate entry for each
thread
Thanks for clarifying that Paul. my output for getconf is:
linuxthreads-0.10
so i guess is normal to have several threads shown by ps axu right?
On 4/17/06, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:12 +0200, Paul Hewlett wrote:
This is incorrect. Asterisk is a
Hmm...my output for getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION is NPTL 2.3.4..
I don't know what it's mean anyway :P
And for Lee, I'm configuring my asterisk through amp (now freepbx), but
I do some custom configuration manually too ;)
I guess Paul is right, I suspect there are bugs in asterisk that
I'm not exactly sure how to phrase this, but I have two offices that I want to
each have an * server. One office has two POTS lines coming in, the other has
five. I'll call the two line office A and the other office B
I want office A to be able to extension dial office B, which I think is
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:54:50AM +0200, Ronald Voermans wrote:
Okay,
First of all, thank you for your input. I didn't know that I could use 1
* for multiple companies (wish I knew it earlier, because installing
vserver and installing * on a vserver took me a lot of time :) ).
:28
Aan: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple Asterisk Installations + SER
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:54:50AM +0200, Ronald Voermans wrote:
Okay,
First of all, thank you for your input. I didn't know that I could use
1
* for multiple companies (wish I knew
Hi,
Ronald Voermans wrote:
If I install 1 * server, with multiple companies/dialplans, how do I
make 1 company dial the other company with a full telephonenumber (i.e.
10 digits)?
This is very much dependant on how your dialplan works. We use
normalisation for each account so the system
: maandag 15 augustus 2005 11:58
Aan: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple Asterisk Installations + SER
Hi,
Ronald Voermans wrote:
If I install 1 * server, with multiple companies/dialplans, how do I
make 1 company dial the other
Brian Capouch wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do some things like round-robin server
balancing and the like using Realtime, and it seems like the right way
to do it would be either via pre-processing the SQL requests coming in,
or using stored procedures in the database that would
Ronald Voermans wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean...
I want to have internal extensions (100, 101, 102, etc.) and some full
phone-numbers (10 digits). How do I implement this in *?
Ronald
Right. We have 3 contexts. 1 is for all incomming traffic from PRI or
other carrier. 1
I'm trying to implement a shared asterisk server for multiple
(different) companies. Here's what I've done so far:
- I've installed multiple asterisk instances on one server (via
vserver). Each * is for one customer, and has it's own extensions (like
100, 101, 102, etc.) Note that the same
- I've installed multiple asterisk instances on one server (via
vserver). Each * is for one customer, and has it's own extensions (like
100, 101, 102, etc.) Note that the same extension can exist on other *
instances
This is completely UNNECESSARY if you simply use contexts. We have 1
Hi,
On 11:41, Sun 14 Aug 05, Matthew Boehm wrote:
- I've installed multiple asterisk instances on one server (via
vserver). Each * is for one customer, and has it's own extensions (like
100, 101, 102, etc.) Note that the same extension can exist on other *
instances
This is
On Sunday 14 August 2005 14:17, Michiel van Baak wrote:
This is completely UNNECESSARY if you simply use contexts. We have 1
asterisk server running 6 different companies and a good majority of
their extensions overlap. This is very easy to configure.
Do you also have some kind of tool
Do you also have some kind of tool so the companies can
manage their own context ?
Yup. We use RealTime Extensions. Customers login to a password protected
website. User/pass is tied to their context so they are able to
add/delete/update anything in their extensions context.
We tell them
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Do you also have some kind of tool so the companies can
manage their own context ?
Yup. We use RealTime Extensions. Customers login to a password protected
website. User/pass is tied to their context so they are able to
add/delete/update anything in their extensions
Verzonden: zondag 14 augustus 2005 18:41
Aan: Asterisk Users
Onderwerp: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple Asterisk Installations + SER
- I've installed multiple asterisk instances on one server (via
vserver). Each * is for one customer, and has it's own extensions
(like 100, 101, 102, etc.) Note
If there are multiple asterisk boxes in use is there a
way to "link" them
together so when the manager api command "show channels" is executed
ALL boxes are reported?
Certainly I can connect to each box and execute the command show
channels
but was just wondering if there was something
Hong Kim wrote:
I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI.
When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25
asterisk processes.
Did someone experienced this?
Regards,
Hong
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
Hi
Il giorno mer, 24-11-2004 alle 19:48 +0100, Ming-Wei Shih ha scritto:
Hong Kim wrote:
I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI.
When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25
asterisk processes.
Did someone experienced this?
Regards,
Hong
snip
I only see one :)
$ ps -ef
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 01:32, Gregory Junker wrote:
Add to it, my message wasn't a flame but rather a terse comment. Your
Never said it was a flame. I said it was in a tone virutally guaranteed
to make the guy consider you and everyone on the list to be a conceited
jackass.
The
On 10:42 AM 11/20/2004, Jose Hernandez wrote:
Did you bother using google?
I searched google but could not find an answer. Any other suggestions?
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-April/043852.html
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
David Boyd wrote:
[snip]
Greg, you need chill; take a deep breath; now say to yourself, let it
g!!
Does hypertensio arteriale and myocardial infarction ring a bell..?
Critch, has the right to respond, anyway he desires. People need to
be responsible for
I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI.
When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25
asterisk processes.
Did someone experienced this?
Regards,
Hong
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 21:08 -0800, Hong Kim wrote:
I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI.
When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25
asterisk processes.
Did someone experienced this?
Did you bother using google?
--
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply.
Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in
public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter
how many times the question has been asked.
Greg
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Fri,
Gregory Junker wrote:
And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply.
Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in
public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter
how many times the question has been asked.
Maybe you could do
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 00:42 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote:
And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply.
Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in
public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter
how many times the
I *do* do the same for his posts. Every hundredth one or so, I feel it
necessary to let the poor guy or gal who was unlucky enough to ask a
simple question that Critch felt the need to answer, that we all were
not like that. As a result, that person might even ask another question
someday.
This was addressed in a different thread, as I recall, regarding
newbie posters, and it was decided, as far as I could tell, that no
benefit would be had of such a thing. The feeling was that newbies
should benefit from veteran experience too.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 01:02 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote:
This was addressed in a different thread, as I recall, regarding
newbie posters, and it was decided, as far as I could tell, that no
benefit would be had of such a thing. The feeling was that newbies
should benefit from veteran
Add to it, my message wasn't a flame but rather a terse comment. Your
Never said it was a flame. I said it was in a tone virutally guaranteed
to make the guy consider you and everyone on the list to be a conceited
jackass.
The difference in your perception of your replies (the one I snipped
At 22:47 8-12-2003 +0100, you wrote:
The setup I imagine would be something like :
- several asterisk servers called sip1.isp.com, sip2.isp.com, ...
- a DNS alias sip.isp.com pointing to all the addresses (thus
providing a round robin resolution on each server)
- each SIP client would register
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:28:27AM +0100, Florian Overkamp wrote:
Registration cascading is not possible (I think) but could it be solved
with a shared dial route:
Instead of DIAL(IAX/sip.isp.com) could you not
DIAL(IAX/sip1.isp.comIAX/sip2.isp.comIAX/sip3.isp.com) to reach a similar
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:48:43 +0100, Nicolas Bougues wrote
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:28:27AM +0100, Florian Overkamp wrote:
Registration cascading is not possible (I think) but could it be
solved
with a shared dial route:
Instead of DIAL(IAX/sip.isp.com) could you not
I suppose trunk groups on SIP would be interesting.
Mark
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:28:27AM +0100, Florian Overkamp wrote:
Registration cascading is not possible (I think) but could it be solved
with a shared dial route:
Instead of
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:02:18AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote:
I suppose trunk groups on SIP would be interesting.
As I understand, trunking in IAX is meant to transport voice packets
from several calls between two hosts in the same lower layer packet.
Are there registration features related
Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:02:18AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote:
I suppose trunk groups on SIP would be interesting.
As I understand, trunking in IAX is meant to transport voice packets
from several calls between two hosts in the same lower layer packet.
Are there
- Original Message -
From: Florian Overkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple Asterisk servers sharing/propagating
registry ?
At 22:47 8-12-2003 +0100, you wrote:
snip
Instead of DIAL(IAX/sip.isp.com
It would be a major change to the code but I think what you'd
want to do is have the Asterisk server store _all_ of it's information
in something like a database, The dail plan, SIP registrations,
everything would have to go there. Once you've done that any
number of Asterisk servers could share
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:40:36AM -0800, Chris Albertson wrote:
It would be a major change to the code but I think what you'd
want to do is have the Asterisk server store _all_ of it's information
in something like a database, The dail plan, SIP registrations,
everything would have to go
Hi Andrew,
Citeren Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Instead of DIAL(IAX/sip.isp.com) could you not
DIAL(IAX/sip1.isp.comIAX/sip2.isp.comIAX/sip3.isp.com) to reach a
similar
effect ? (or chain them in different lines so it tries to reach the first
one, then the second one if it fails,
Hi,
Citeren Nicolas Bougues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It would be a major change to the code but I think what you'd
want to do is have the Asterisk server store _all_ of it's information
in something like a database, The dail plan, SIP registrations,
everything would have to go there. Once
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:40:36AM -0800, Chris Albertson wrote:
It would be a major change to the code but I think what you'd
want to do is have the Asterisk server store _all_ of it's information
in something like a database, The dail plan, SIP registrations,
everything would have to go
I'd like to know if there is a way for multiple asterisk servers to
share a common SIP and/or IAX registry.
The setup I imagine would be something like :
- several asterisk servers called sip1.isp.com, sip2.isp.com, ...
- a DNS alias sip.isp.com pointing to all the addresses (thus
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
