On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:39:21AM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> I've created a page on wiki.asterisk.org outlining some changes
> we're proposing to make to the Asterisk release and support cycles.
> As always, before implementing any changes of this type, we'd like
> to collect some community
2012/1/31 John Knight
> Personally, I don't think what Digium is doing is necessarily a perfect
> approach (hey, what is? we're all human), but they've vastly improved the
> quality of Asterisk from a support perspective.
>
>
I also agree that IMHO, Asterisk quality has vastly improved.
Though n
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:52 -0500, John Knight wrote:
> > I like the idea of LTR release more often that would have the
> > feature patches baked in. Case in point the new conference app
> > requires a jump to version 10 while the 1.8 conference app is quite
> > useless but 1.8 is my LTR version s
I like it!
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
On 01/31/2012 05:20 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
To properly phrase the question, "why is 10.X not an LTS release"?
Umm... because it wasn't planned to be, and the decision was made nearly
two years ago? Asterisk 1.8 is an LTS release, and now (with this
proposal) Asterisk 11 would also be an LT
The LTR releases have a shorter support/life cycle and 10 is not an LTR.
That accounts for the shorter life on 10. This is why I like this proposal.
We would get faster LTR releases and that would allow us to have newer
features sooner but still offer existing deployments security fixes on LTR
digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and
support cycles
On 01/31/2012 05:14 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> 1.8 and 11 forward all seem to have a timeline of around 5 years. 10
> only runs for two. Since the code is available that isn't a big
risk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:13 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and
support cycles
On 01/31/2012 04:07 PM, Danny Nicholas
ists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:13 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and
support cycles
On 01/31/2012 04:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
&
On 01/31/2012 04:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
Why the "short life" on Asterisk 10?
Can you rephrase your question? This proposal does not change the
planned lifetime of Asterisk 10 at all.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kflem...@digium.com | SIP:
on
Subject: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and support
cycles
I've created a page on wiki.asterisk.org outlining some changes we're
proposing to make to the Asterisk release and support cycles. As always,
before implementing any changes of this type, we'd like
From: "Kevin P. Fleming"
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:36 PM
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion"
Subject: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk
release and support
t - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Subject: [asterisk-users] Proposed changes to Asterisk release and support
cycles
I've created a page on wiki.asterisk.org outlining some changes we're
proposing to make to the Asterisk release and support cycles. As always,
before implementing any c
I've created a page on wiki.asterisk.org outlining some changes we're
proposing to make to the Asterisk release and support cycles. As always,
before implementing any changes of this type, we'd like to collect some
community feedback on the proposal.
The page is here:
https://wiki.asterisk.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
