Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-06 Thread Jay Austad
it successfully and have the configs. I'm going to put them on the web some time soon. -Original Message- From: Jay Austad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:48 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? I

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-06 Thread David W. Rice
, May 06, 2007 2:11 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? Doh, I didn't compile meetme support into this install because it said it required a zaptel card for the hardware timers. I have a spare zaptel card, but I'd

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-06 Thread shadowym
PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? SLA requires meetme which requires at a minimum ztdummy. So, you must compile and install zaptel, then compile and install asterisk 1.4.3

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-05 Thread David W. Rice
. I'm going to put them on the web some time soon. -Original Message- From: Jay Austad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:48 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? I configured my sla.conf to use

[asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-04 Thread Jay Austad
I configured my sla.conf to use with a Polycom phone. I have no idea if I did it right, however, none of the console sla commands exist. Do I have to something special to compile in this support, or should it just work out of the box? ~jay ___

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-04 Thread Stephen Bosch
Jay Austad wrote: I configured my sla.conf to use with a Polycom phone. I have no idea if I did it right, however, none of the console sla commands exist. Do I have to something special to compile in this support, or should it just work out of the box? It sounds like you're missing a module