Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Friday 24 August 2007 20:27, Russell Bryant wrote: > Let *me* ask a question. :) What level of heavy regression testing would > you *expect* of an open source development team? Unit tests. What unit tests are available for me to try? Can you share the tests your lab is doing with the Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:46:10PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 02:02:14AM -0400, Matt Florell wrote: > > On 8/24/07, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's a secondary question (and Matt, I *do* plan to get around the > > > damned corner to one of your m

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 02:02:14AM -0400, Matt Florell wrote: > On 8/24/07, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a secondary question (and Matt, I *do* plan to get around the > > damned corner to one of your meetups one of these days :-): > > > > Just how easy is it to roll back to

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Julian Lyndon-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We have been running 1.4 since July 06 (it was trunk then), and have >> upgraded often with the 1.4 branch (Currently on SVN-branch-1.4-r77571). >> >> We have 100+ extensions (SIP) and 30

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On 8/24/07, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:00:23PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote: > > With all of that said, I do have a testing setup that allows me to run > > tests at high loads on Asterisk, but not all scenarios can be checked > > in a testing setup. I ran a

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > Just how easy is it to roll back to the older release when the feces > hit the fan? Seems like making that simple would be pretty important? Well, my opinion is that it is very easy. If it's not, I'd be happy to hear it so that we can make it easier. The only thing you

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:00:23PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote: > With all of that said, I do have a testing setup that allows me to run > tests at high loads on Asterisk, but not all scenarios can be checked > in a testing setup. I ran a mid-volume test on 1.4.10 and it worked > without crashing. I

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Lyndon-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been running 1.4 since July 06 (it was trunk then), and have > upgraded often with the 1.4 branch (Currently on SVN-branch-1.4-r77571). > > We have 100+ extensions (SIP) and 30 ISDN channels. We often have 50

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Steve Totaro wrote: > 1.0 is over-ripe or rotten/forgotten and thrown away. Besides, we all > know that 1.0 was just a marketing ploy to legitimize Asterisk. What > serious company is going to install 1.BETA2 or .90? Maybe a > nonessential piece of software but not something as mission critic

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Doug Lytle wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: >> >> stability problems) with 1.0, ahve already migrated to 1.2 or 1.4, and >> now swear (by?) 1.2 or 1.4. >> >> > My decision based on what I've been reading in the bug tracker and > p

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Russell Bryant wrote: > James FitzGibbon wrote: > >> Let me ask a question myself: what kind of regression test does * undergo >> before release, and what level of traffic gets put through stuff like >> app_queue? I assume it's not real-world scale, else these hard to pin down >> concurrency is

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

We have been running 1.4 since July 06 (it was trunk then), and have upgraded often with the 1.4 branch (Currently on SVN-branch-1.4-r77571). We have 100+ extensions (SIP) and 30 ISDN channels. We often have 50+ agents available for outbound calls and queues (20+ queues). We are making / receiv

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Joshua Colp wrote: > Doug Lytle wrote: > >> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: >>> >>> stability problems) with 1.0, ahve already migrated to 1.2 or 1.4, and >>> now swear (by?) 1.2 or 1.4. >>> >>> >>> >> My decision based

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

> I stay with 1.2.12 or somewhere around there. "End Of Life" but seems > to have a better ticker than 1.4. > > Thanks, > Steve > > > 1.2.12/14/17 all have seemed very stable to me so far. >>> Both of which are anecdo

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On 8/24/07, Joshua Colp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doug Lytle wrote: > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: > >> > >> stability problems) with 1.0, ahve already migrated to 1.2 or 1.4, and > >> now swear (by?) 1.2 or 1.4. > >> > >> > > I'm goin

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

James FitzGibbon wrote: > On 8/24/07, *Joshua Colp* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > I'm going to end this email with a question myself... how many people > have Asterisk on a development/staging server before deployment, test, > and isolate the issues they

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

James FitzGibbon wrote: > Let me ask a question myself: what kind of regression test does * undergo > before release, and what level of traffic gets put through stuff like > app_queue? I assume it's not real-world scale, else these hard to pin down > concurrency issues we're seeing would have been

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Joshua Colp wrote: > I'm going to end this email with a question myself... how many people > have Asterisk on a development/staging server before deployment, test, > and isolate the issues they may have in their specific scenario? > I do, but with limited resources for testing (2 polycoms, no

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On 8/24/07, Joshua Colp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to end this email with a question myself... how many people > have Asterisk on a development/staging server before deployment, test, > and isolate the issues they may have in their specific scenario? I do, but many of the problems I

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Doug Lytle wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: >> >> stability problems) with 1.0, ahve already migrated to 1.2 or 1.4, and >> now swear (by?) 1.2 or 1.4. >> >> > My decision based on what I've been reading in the bug tracker and > p

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

While it is not exactly running a huge system, I have had one 1.4 system running in a small office of 10 phones since June with no problems and another small system for about a month with no problems. I have also had a larger system (80+ phones, DUNDi and IAX trunking to 11 sites) running 1.4 for a

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: > > stability problems) with 1.0, ahve already migrated to 1.2 or 1.4, and > now swear (by?) 1.2 or 1.4. > > My decision based on what I've been reading in the bug tracker and people commenting on how they'v

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:16:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote: > > > >> Steve Totaro wrote: > >>> I stay with 1.2.12 or somewhere around there. "End Of Life" but seems > >>> to have a better ticker than 1.4

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

> Until 1.4 improves, I'm staying with 1.2 Ditto ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-us

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:16:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote: > >> Steve Totaro wrote: >> >>> David Gomillion wrote: >>> On 8/23/07, *Ed Pastore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi, folks. I've been on

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:16:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote: > Steve Totaro wrote: > > David Gomillion wrote: > >> On 8/23/07, *Ed Pastore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, folks. > >> > >> I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Steve Totaro wrote: > David Gomillion wrote: >> On 8/23/07, *Ed Pastore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, folks. >> >> I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems >> to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleedi

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

David Gomillion wrote: > On 8/23/07, *Ed Pastore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems > to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge. > They qualify a

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

On 8/23/07, Ed Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems > to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge. > They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them "production stable" > since half the t

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Ed Pastore wrote: > since half the time a new one comes out, a fix for it comes out the > next day. > > So... that said, what's a good version to linger on? I don't *need* > > Until 1.4 improves, I'm staying with 1.2 > I do know that I'm running some version of 1.2, and am also not sure >

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Show version from the CLI. Ed Pastore wrote: > Hi, folks. > > I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems > to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge. > They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them "production stable" > since half the t

[asterisk-users] Stable-Stable Asterisk

Hi, folks. I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge. They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them "production stable" since half the time a new one comes out, a fix for it comes out the nex