7;s a summary of the important paradigm shift you'll have to understand
to use this technology the way it was designed. It's different than you may
be used to, but far more powerful.
Good luck!
-Karl
- Original Message -
From: "hbk"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, Nov
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Best practice to set up 4 line phones
Hi,
I would like some advice from you on how to configure a multi line phone
the best way!
So far I have given the phone 4 sip accounts one for each line, this is
a lot of work and gets messy.
Is it
Hi,
I would like some advice from you on how to configure a multi line phone
the best way!
So far I have given the phone 4 sip accounts one for each line, this is
a lot of work and gets messy.
Is it a better way to do this?
Thank you!
Best regards
Helge-Bjørn
_
m [mailto:
> asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Wilton Helm
> *Sent:* April-08-09 12:40 PM
> *To:* Asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Best Practice Advice?
>
>
>
> >Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first.
&g
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Wilton Helm schrieb:
>>> Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first.
>
> And by the way: Debian 5 "Lenny" is out. http://www.debian.org/
I've been a Debian user since more or less the begining (of Debian that
is - there was sls before that
Wilton Helm schrieb:
>>Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first.
And by the way: Debian 5 "Lenny" is out. http://www.debian.org/
Philipp Kempgen
--
AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / Germany -> http://www.amoocon.de
Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk
digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Best Practice Advice?
>Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first.
Unless you are a strong Linux Guru, I would never recommend a Fedora release
for a production system. I have FC9 here and FC10. It took me months to
eliminate the bugs
>Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first.
Unless you are a strong Linux Guru, I would never recommend a Fedora release
for a production system. I have FC9 here and FC10. It took me months to
eliminate the bugs from FC9, and I still haven't gotten FC10 to install on the
machine
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys
wrote:
> I have a asterisk setup that is currently running on version 1.4.15 – I wish
> to upgrade or migrate this instance to the current asterisk stable,
> 1.6.0.6. It is my intention to build a FC8 box, then install asterisk from
> source, and
I would upgrade to the latest 1.4, if stable is what is needed.
PaulH
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have a asterisk setup that is currently running on version 1.4.15 –
> I wish to upgrade or migrate this instance to the current asterisk
> stable, 1.6.0.6. It is my intention to bu
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have a asterisk setup that is currently running on version 1.4.15 – I
> wish to upgrade or migrate this instance to the current asterisk stable,
> 1.6.0.6. It is my intention to build a FC8 box, then install asterisk
> from source, and begin to
Dear All,
I have a asterisk setup that is currently running on version 1.4.15 - I
wish to upgrade or migrate this instance to the current asterisk stable,
1.6.0.6. It is my intention to build a FC8 box, then install asterisk
from source, and begin to migrate over the configuration. The thing is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am setting up an Asterisk server to provide voice messaging in a campus
> setting. I am interested in how others have Asterisk set up in regards to
> firewalls and web interface access to minimize security risks.
:)
Best
I am setting up an Asterisk server to provide voice messaging in a campus
setting. I am interested in how others have Asterisk set up in regards to
firewalls and web interface access to minimize security risks.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
Hi All
For the scenario of a single asterisk server that needs to serve clients
on the net, as well as local office clients, I would be very interested
in people's views of the best method to handle security to prevent net
based attacks while still allowing the client access.
Some of the chall
15 matches
Mail list logo
