Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-16 Thread Torgeir Berg
Bob Goddard wrote: Got some proof of that? It's generally regarded as common knowlege in these circles that the via processors claim 686 compatibility but lack some 686-specific instructions (CMPXCHG among them), and this is what causes the trouble. GCC says 686 instructions, ok. and the Via

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-10 Thread Bob Goddard
On Thursday 09 Jun 2005 23:45, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Thursday 09 June 2005 13:15, Bob Goddard wrote: The Via processors emulate the i686 just fine. The problem has always been with GCC. Got some proof of that? It's generally regarded as common knowlege in these circles that the via

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-10 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 10 June 2005 02:07, Bob Goddard wrote: The Via C3 processors lack the CMPXCHG8B (CMOV) instructions and I assume others which are listed in the Intel documents as being optional. GCC assumes that they are always there. Look at http://radagast.bglug.ca/epia/epia_howto/x1098.html,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread abel
] On Behalf Of Kristian Kielhofner Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:36 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF abel wrote: My theory is that the 64 MB image is built with a specific hdd form factor and when burning onto

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
abel wrote: Seshu, Are you working on a VIA based motherboard? I am working on a VIA based motherboard. Andy Powell (author of Asterisk Live! distro) tells me that VIA is not quite good when emulating i686 behavoir and since his distro is compiled for i686... We are trying to confirm that but

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread Bob Goddard
On Thursday 09 Jun 2005 17:29, abel wrote: Seshu, Are you working on a VIA based motherboard? I am working on a VIA based motherboard. Andy Powell (author of Asterisk Live! distro) tells me that VIA is not quite good when emulating i686 behavoir and since his distro is compiled for i686...

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of abel Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 12:29 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF Seshu, Are you working on a VIA based motherboard? I am working

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread Bob Goddard
On Thursday 09 Jun 2005 18:55, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote: Abel, I am working on Intel boards only. I have tried VIA boards and I do not recommend anyone to work on VIA boards for a production system. The reasons for this being that there are just way too many issues with these

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread The VoIP Connection
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:55 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF Abel, I am working on Intel boards only. I have tried VIA boards and I do not recommend anyone to work on VIA boards

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-09 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Thursday 09 June 2005 13:15, Bob Goddard wrote: The Via processors emulate the i686 just fine. The problem has always been with GCC. Got some proof of that? It's generally regarded as common knowlege in these circles that the via processors claim 686 compatibility but lack some

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-06 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
Abel, In have the same issue when I have burned the image to an 800MB CF Disk. All it displays is GRUB CLI in a continuous stream. Seshu -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of abel Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-06 Thread abel
My theory is that the 64 MB image is built with a specific hdd form factor and when burning onto a different size CF it is mapped differently and it does not work. On the other hand, you always can find out how the device is beeing seen by the system and customize the binary image accordingly.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-06 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
abel wrote: My theory is that the 64 MB image is built with a specific hdd form factor and when burning onto a different size CF it is mapped differently and it does not work. On the other hand, you always can find out how the device is beeing seen by the system and customize the binary image

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-06 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
, my 800MB CF disk with your distro on it, you for your RD. Seshu -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristian Kielhofner Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:36 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Live! CF

2005-06-06 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote: Kristian, I am talking about your distro, that does not seem to be able to boot when I have mounted (if that is the right word) the CF into my Dell Server and tried to boot from it as the only IDE drive available. The Linux just does not kick in. If you want