You forgot need and please
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:07, John Novack wrote:
Forums, perhaps.
The SUBJECT was mailing list traffic, though. I know you want to
change the subject, but the discussion on traffic mentioned splitting
off ( fill in the blank ) to another list, NOT list vs Forum.
Bah, I went off on a
I have a rule in my outlook to delete any email that
in the subject it says asterisk users mailing list
traffic. Get my drift ? This topic has been around
for a long time as others have mentioned and people
keep replying. This useless topic alone adds several
messages to my inbox daily.
I agree. Gmail and mailing lists go together as well as Coke and ice. I moved all my mailing lists over to Gmail and it's great. It keeps lists out of my main email and the search is so good, you think it's Google :-)
On 3/20/06, Brian Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/06, James Harper
[EMAIL
Isn't it curious that, given the delete rule, he knows this has been
discussed once again, and feels the need to add to the number of
useless messages.
In fact, since the subject keeps coming up, perhaps there really is an
issue that needs to be addressed??
The only thing constant is
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 10:51, John Novack wrote:
In fact, since the subject keeps coming up, perhaps there really is an
issue that needs to be addressed??
It has been addressed. There are a host of forum sites specific to Asterisk,
and even more (such as tek-tips) which include Asterisk
LOL, but it's such an interesting discussion :-P
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Dovid Bender wrote:
I have a rule in my outlook to delete any email that
in the subject it says asterisk users mailing list
traffic. Get my drift ? This topic has been around
for a long time as others have mentioned and
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 10:51, John Novack wrote:
In fact, since the subject keeps coming up, perhaps there really is an
issue that needs to be addressed??
It has been addressed. There are a host of forum sites specific to Asterisk, and even more (such
On Monday 20 March 2006 23:06, Ira wrote:
I doubt the goal is to keep traffic down, in my case it might mean I
don't need to delete all of the hardware related stuff which at this
time is essentially of no interest to me. Personally I'd be more
likely to help with answers to my limited
Whether or not a forum is a better idea isn't really depending on the
subject matter IMHO. Its success or failure depends on what the
prospective participants like better. I personally cannot stand forums.
That's a place where I have to expend energy to go there and manually
click through
Charles Marcus wrote:
Whether or not a forum is a better idea isn't really depending on the
subject matter IMHO. Its success or failure depends on what the
prospective participants like better. I personally cannot stand
forums. That's a place where I have to expend energy to go there and
Derek Whitten wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Whether or not a forum is a better idea isn't really depending on the
subject matter IMHO. Its success or failure depends on what the
prospective participants like better. I personally cannot stand
forums. That's a place where I have to expend energy
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 15:11, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Too bad you didn't include the word forum in the subject.
It's called a .procmailrc:
:0
* ^Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ huge .procmailrc snipped ]
.Asterisk-Users/
}
So do you get *any* traffic for -users? :-)
-A.
One thing that may help:
I use outlook rule to move all the messages into a folder.
Then outlook has a feature, instead of sorting by date, or subject, you can
sort by conservation.
It then groups the messages by thread in date order, so you can sort through
the emails very quickly and allows
On 3/19/06, James Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That being said, a mailing list with a forum interface (or a forum witha mailing list option) might be a reasonable compromise as it should
meet the needs of both mailing list lovers and forum lovers (assuming itis implemented properly!)
All- if
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:23:03PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
This same issue has been discussed many times over the last two years.
Not likely its going to change now.
I just love this attitude.
Could someone managing these lists outline the
requirements to change the lists?
Do we need a vote
Kristian Larsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:23:03PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
This same issue has been discussed many times over the last two years.
Not likely its going to change now.
I just love this attitude.
Guess its not an attitude as much as having been around this list for
On Monday 20 March 2006 09:39, Kristian Larsson wrote:
I just love this attitude.
A modicum of thought for others may save you from yourself. This has been
discussed many, many times. The problem is a complex one, and one that has
been thought through many times by people much smarter than
On Monday 20 March 2006 09:56, Rich Adamson wrote:
FWIW, I'd vote to keep it the way it is now and I'll just make use of
the delete key to handle uninteresting noise.
Amen. I currently have 12619 messages in -users, and that's with kmail
expiring old messages. I've been on these lists as
One thing that may help:
I use outlook rule to move all the messages into a folder.
Then outlook has a feature, instead of sorting by date, or subject,
you
can sort by conservation.
Me too. Except, for some reason it often misses the first message of the
conversation (especially if I'm
At 07:07 AM 03/20/2006, you wrote:
I've been involved in projects with
eighty mailing lists to cover every facet of the project to try and keep
traffic down and it Simply Does Not Work. Anyone claiming otherwise has
never been involved in such a project.
I doubt the goal is to keep traffic
David Rahn wrote:
This would lend its self to less repitition of questions as the lists
would be much more searchable At this time I 3 months of this list
and it is over 13,900 messages.
In other words GREAT IDEA I THIRD THAT!!
I do think all hardware disscussion ( as it effects
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Marcus wrote:
Actually, for something like Asterisk, that has so many different
aspects, a Forum would be a much better idea. Then, each piece of
hardware can have its own category, along with an FAQ.
You mean something like:
At 07:50 AM 03/19/2006, you wrote:
Actually, for something like Asterisk, that has so many different
aspects, a Forum would be a much better idea. Then, each piece of
hardware can have its own category, along with an FAQ.
There's lots of Asterisk forums out there already, but weirdly enough
On 19 Mar 2006, at 17:47, Ira wrote:
At 07:50 AM 03/19/2006, you wrote:
Actually, for something like Asterisk, that has so many different
aspects, a Forum would be a much better idea. Then, each piece of
hardware can have its own category, along with an FAQ.
There's lots of Asterisk
Actually, for something like Asterisk, that has so many different
aspects, a Forum would be a much better idea. Then, each piece of
hardware can have its own category, along with an FAQ.
Please no. A forum might be okay if you have a nice fast web connection
and/or a bit of patience, and if
I was also thinking a list for newbies...
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: Robert La Ferla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 2:33 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Users Mailing List Traffic
The volume/traffic on this list has
On Mar 18, 2006, at 2:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was also thinking a list for newbies...
As a newb I think that is a bad idea. First of all, the heavy hitters
will all want to avoid it( a newb list). Secondly I have learned a LOT
just by reading other peoples (non newbs) problems
Hi all,
First post, etc, etc. :)
Robert La Ferla wrote:
Perhaps, we could split the list into two:
As the list uses Mailman, it is possible to specify topics on the
subject prefix and then set your Mailman preferences to select which
topics you like.
The admin could, for a simple
Splitting the list by type of request may be a good idea, but
splitting based on skill level is just a bad idea... I'm pretty sure
that regardless of a newbie's status, they'll still just go to the
other lists as the newbie list likely won't do much good.
In short, I agree with different
This same issue has been discussed many times over the last two years.
Not likely its going to change now.
Aaron Daniel wrote:
Splitting the list by type of request may be a good idea, but splitting
based on skill level is just a bad idea... I'm pretty sure that
regardless of a newbie's
.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 18 mars 2006 23:05
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Users Mailing List Traffic
I was also thinking a list
Why not shove all the ENDLESS discussions on Cisco, Polycom, Snom, and
other problem phones to their own list?
John Novack
Robert La Ferla wrote:
The volume/traffic on this list has been getting pretty heavy. I find
it hard to follow certain discussions and there are some that I am not
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Users Mailing List Traffic
Why not shove all the ENDLESS discussions on Cisco, Polycom, Snom, and
other problem phones to their own list?
John Novack
Robert La Ferla wrote:
The volume/traffic on this list has been getting pretty heavy
34 matches
Mail list logo
