Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-05-31 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Darren, Darren Nickerson wrote: Steve Underwood wrote: Are you sure that approach is free from patent problems? I thought the ECM protocol was encumbered. If not, that is good news. :-) Steve, I'm not a lawyer, but I'll give this a shot ;-) Although particular vendor implementations

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-05-30 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi, Lee Howard wrote: Almost all fax software, including your WinFax 7.0, that supports Fax Class 2, Class 2.0, or Class 2.1 will usually therefore support ECM when the modem (DCE) itself supports ECM in those Fax Classes. This is because the DCE does the ECM protocol work, and the software

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-05-30 Thread Darren Nickerson
Steve Underwood wrote: Lee Howards wrote: However, many (although not all, dare I say most?) modems support Fax Class 1 or Class 1.0. In this mode the faxing is heavily dependent upon the DTE and thus the support or lack of support for ECM comes from the fax software. Your average

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Bisker, Scott (7805)
Michiel, Are you using WinFax? or one of the Products Based on Winfax? I've seen this on all of our WinFax Stations, but none of our standalone Fax machines. -sb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of michiel betel Sent: Wednesday, March 10,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Jim Sneeringer
way to accomplish the goal of computer faxing with Asterisk? Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bisker, Scott (7805) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Ed Rubright
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes I'm having the same symptoms using X100P's, TDM400P's and WinFax, and have and have had no luck correcting it. I don't have a standalone fax machine to test with. Does anyone know if this a problem whenever faxes are sent and received

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Darren Nickerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.215.438.4638 ext 8106 office +1.215.243.8335 fax - Original Message - From: Jim Sneeringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:47 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes I'm having the same symptoms using X100P's

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Eric Wieling
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes Michiel, Are you using WinFax? or one of the Products Based on Winfax? I've seen this on all of our WinFax Stations, but none of our standalone Fax machines. -sb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Jim Sneeringer
could I try that might reduce this noise? Thanks again. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Nickerson Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes Jim

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Michiel Betel
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bisker, Scott (7805) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes Michiel, Are you using WinFax? or one of the Products Based on Winfax? I've seen

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Eric Wieling
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:25, Michiel Betel wrote: Eric Wieling wrote: First of all Asterisk does not support ${VARIABLES} as part of the extension number. i.e. exten = ${BLAH},1,NoOp is not valid, but exten = 1234,1,NoOp(${BLAH}) is valid. Huh !?! Astreisk might not support it

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Jim Sneeringer
on a timeout. Then a fax that does not send a CNG can sometimes still get through. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes First

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Lee Howard
On 2004.03.10 10:18 Jim Sneeringer wrote: Do you know if there is other fax software that supports ECM? Please forgive me for butting in on this thread, but I can't resist plugging HylaFAX. Almost all fax software, including your WinFax 7.0, that supports Fax Class 2, Class 2.0, or Class 2.1

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Don Pobanz
On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 12:19 PM, Jim Sneeringer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Darren, snip Also, why should Asterisk introduce a lot of noise? (Faxes work fine without Asterisk or with the old phone system.) I'm using a 2.4GHz Pentium 4 with two X100P's and two TDM400P's. Faxes are

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk mangling faxes

2004-03-10 Thread Walt Reed
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:50:55AM -0800, Lee Howard said: On 2004.03.10 10:18 Jim Sneeringer wrote: Do you know if there is other fax software that supports ECM? snipped Modems that I know of that support ECM in some fashion in Class 2/2.0/2.1 are the MultiTech 5634 V92 family