Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca writes:
Check out HAAST (High Availability ASTerisk) at [1]www.generationd.com
(also on the voip wiki)
You get the cluster/heartbeat replication without needing to add openSER
or full HAlinux. A simpler approach - easier to config and manage
How do you handle
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen
[benny+use...@amorsen.dk]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Michelle Dupuis
On 9/27/10 8:57 PM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
HAAST runs a sync script a regular intervals (time to sync data prior to a
failover check etc)
HAAST includes a sample script which syncs voicemail (and config, etc) files
using rsync from master to slave. After a master/slave reversal the
: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vahan Yerkanian
[va...@arminco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On 9/27/10 8:57 PM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
HAAST
to
everybody...
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vahan Yerkanian
[va...@arminco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk
-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 5:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca writes:
Check
How do you handle replicating voice mails?
I do that by putting the voicemails into MYSQL and replicating that.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live
Check out HAAST (High Availability ASTerisk) at [1]www.generationd.com
Bit out of my pricing. It must be possible to do it using downloadable
open-source.
Dan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
Check out HAAST (High Availability ASTerisk) at
www.generationd.comhttp://www.generationd.com (also on the voip wiki)
You get the cluster/heartbeat replication without needing to add openSER or
full HAlinux. A simpler approach - easier to config and manage
MD
Hello List,
I need a weed to load balance some asterisk boxes that
have pstn connectivity via E1. The problem is that i will not use sip
phones but instead call files for auto dialing. Is is possible to load
balance when call are generated from call files?
Thank you
Dan
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: 14 February 2010 16:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Of Steve Totaro
Sent: 14 February 2010 16:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
d...@keshercommunications.com wrote:
Hello,
My host just had a faulty power supply
by Kesher Communications Ltd.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: 07 March 2010 19:15
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Just do
] *On Behalf Of *Steve Totaro
*Sent:* 07 March 2010 19:15
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Just do something like Dial(SIP/asteriskbox1asteriskbox2/{$EXTEN})
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Dan Journo d
I’ve been googling “asterisk redundancy” but all I’ve found is questions,
and no real answers.
Is this any help Dan?
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+High+Availability+Solutions
Chris
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
d...@keshercommunications.com wrote:
Hello,
My host just had a faulty power supply and therefore, my Asterisk server was
down for 7 hours.
It was a Sunday so no one was making calls, however if it happened during
the week, I’d have problems.
...@asteriskhelpdesk.com
Sent: 14 February 2010 16:56
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Journo
d...@keshercommunications.com wrote:
Hello,
My host just had
Adrian Marsh wrote:
interested in how people are clustering Asterisk, if that's possible,
or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could take over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What we do is the following:
Our CPE (Customer premises equipment) registers via IAX with all of our
servers at the same time (with qualify turned on for the links).
All of the servers first try to reach numbers via local IAX links.
If this fails
On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
stupid Twin-Wan to work:
At 04:57 9/29/2007, Michiel van Baak, wrote:
On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Any suggestions on dual-wan routers?
On 16:34, Sat 29 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
At 04:57 9/29/2007, Michiel van Baak, wrote:
On 21:47, Fri 28 Sep 07, Doug wrote:
At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Also be sure that you have a very redundant network configuration.
Too often I see people spend a great deal of time and money to get
redundant servers when their switches, firewalls, routers, etc are not
even capable of handling a failed network element.
You can
At 08:01 9/28/2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Also be sure that you have a very redundant network configuration.
Too often I see people spend a great deal of time and money to get
redundant servers when their switches, firewalls, routers, etc are not
even capable of handling
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
stupid Twin-Wan to work:
http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php
A PC?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
At 20:53 9/28/2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:28:18PM -0500, Doug wrote:
How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
stupid Twin-Wan to work:
http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php
A PC?
- Original Message
From: SIP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:31:08 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
Per Jessen wrote:
Atis Lezdins wrote:
This seems nice way
- Original Message
From: Scott Moseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:07:06 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On 9/26/07, SIP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Atis Lezdins wrote:
This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
whenever Asterisk crashes, calls are lost, and that means - lost
money. Are there any ideas?
Perhaps investigate/diagnose the craches?
Per Jessen wrote:
Atis Lezdins wrote:
This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
whenever Asterisk crashes, calls are lost, and that means - lost
money. Are there any ideas?
Perhaps
On 9/26/07, SIP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. It's not. But there still exists the possibility even in a
relatively stable situation that the software could crash or that
hardware could fail. It's best, when planning a highly-available
solution, to plan for the unforeseen and not assume you
Adrian Marsh wrote:
I'm interested in how people are clustering Asterisk, if that's
possible, or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well
backed-up, and I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS
change could take
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:59 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I haven't looked into it in any detail, but how about the standard Linux
HA solution with a heartbeat monitor, a shared file-system and IP
take-over?
It's been my experience that this usually works fairly well for
stateless protocols like
of looking at
Linux-HA.
Adrian Marsh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared
Smith
Sent: 25 September 2007 15:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Tue, 2007-09-25
Adrian Marsh wrote:
I'm interested in how people are clustering Asterisk, if that's possible,
or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could take
Adrian Marsh wrote:
so maybe it's a case of looking at
Linux-HA.
If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
alive and respond to queries.
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:01 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Adrian Marsh wrote:
so maybe it's a case of looking at
Linux-HA.
If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
alive and respond to queries.
Have
Dave Walker wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:01 +0200, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Adrian Marsh wrote:
so maybe it's a case of looking at
Linux-HA.
If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
alive and respond to
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:27:37 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:59 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I haven't looked into it in any detail, but how about the standard Linux
HA solution with a heartbeat monitor
Nagios that's not redundancy.
- Original Message
From: Dave Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:09:46 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On Tue
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:10 -0500, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Nagios that's not redundancy.
And a brick isn't a house.
Clearly you know what Nagios is; and it's support for event-handlers.
If you had taken a moment to think, then you would know Nagios can form
part of a redundancy system.
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Adrian Marsh wrote:
so maybe it's a case of looking at
Linux-HA.
If I remember this correctly a normal ping is all Linux HA can
do. It does not check whether Asterisk or other services are
alive and respond to queries.
I think the basic Linux-HA setup works with
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
I don't want to quote my text as not to spam the list (although
it's all GPL). There's a nice countdown at
http://www.amooma.de/gemeinschaft/
Very nice. I'll have to come back and take a closer look sometime.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your
On 9/25/07, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adrian Marsh wrote:
I'm interested in how people are clustering Asterisk, if that's possible,
or how you might be achieving a redundant solution.
I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and
I've a
- Original Message
From: Atis Lezdins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Redundancy
On 9/25/07, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED
[snip]
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-August/195339.html
could provide you with some answers.
Hi,
This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over
calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that
whenever Asterisk crashes,
A little off topic, but SipX has built in redudancy. if it is so
important to you, you should have a look.
On 9/25/07, Atis Lezdins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-August/195339.html
could provide you with some answers.
Hi,
I will tell you straight up that NFS mounted volumes will cause asterisk to
croak if it needs access to something that's not mounted. The first time
the NFS share disappears for a moment, you're going to be restarting
services and losing time on the asterisk machines that need the mounts. It
On 4/17/06, Joseph Rothstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using a PRI to Ethernet bridge, or any other kind of E1 GW thatwould allow failover to an alternate Asterisk box without manually switchingthe cable? This one is a litteexpensive(
As a matter of curiosity, does anyone know what the E1/T1 interface in
this (redfone) box is ?
Could the box be an embedded linux device with a PCI slot, running linux
and therefore zaptel, and therefore the PCI card could be a Digium or
sangoma card ...
Any clues ? Does anyone have such a
On 17 Apr 2006, at 12:58, Joseph Rothstein wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion about Asterisk redundancy. I know
this has
been covered in the past, but would like to get an idea of what
people are
doing for a production system that must be up all the time.
Assuming a single E1 out.
I'd like to start a discussion about Asterisk redundancy. I know this has
been covered in the past, but would like to get an idea of what people are
doing for a production system that must be up all the time.
I'm going to pipe in on this one. Asterisk redundancy is a huge
discussion on this
2006/4/17, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2) You will fail. 100% uptime doesn't happen - ever - folks get close,
but every step costs exponentially more, and gets exponentially morecomplex - so much harder to maintain - so more fragile.To back Tim's reply, what happens if your E1 failover switch
53 matches
Mail list logo
