RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-28 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:34 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations I get annoyed Stephen when Digium

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-26 Thread Michael Collins
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming apparent that there is no mechanism for implementing this. I'm

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-26 Thread Patrick
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:33 -0700, Michael Collins wrote: I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:36 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations Is it possible for you

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Watkins, Bradley
: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:16 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations -Original Message- From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:36 AM To: Asterisk

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:59 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:23 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations -Original Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Aaron Daniel
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: No... this last bit doesnt. My dundi.conf has: 180q = global_dundi_q_pbx1,100,IAX,dundi1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial 180q = global_dundi_q_pbx2,200,IAX,dundi2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBER},nopartial 180q =

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Aaron Daniel
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: Ahh this reminds me too. If I am going to be getting the local system first always, then I need to be able to return ALL the Dundi paths with the DUNDILOOKUP function. It only returns one. How can I get DUNDILookup to return every single path? It'd

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations

2006-06-15 Thread Douglas Garstang
Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to HandleComplexFailoverSituations On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote: No... this last bit doesnt. My dundi.conf has: 180q = global_dundi_q_pbx1,100,IAX,dundi1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${NUMBE R},nopartial 180q