Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Business Edition

2005-07-24 Thread Henry [VoIP-PBX.ca]
Darren Nickerson wrote: "Brian West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very valid point. Which was, I presume, that companies that once collaborated on Asterisk development such as Sangoma don't find themselves on friendly terms with Digium now that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Business Edition

2005-07-24 Thread Brian West
But I guess I'm wondering ... does the present licensing model discourage other vendors from contributing to *? I'm not sure Sangoma developers could sign the disclaimers even if they wanted to ... but then again I don't know if there's anyone there with anything to offer. I would think that that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Business Edition

2005-07-23 Thread Brian Capouch
Aidan Van Dyk wrote: Is this indicative to how Digium people respond to everything (including the company that built the first asterisk-supporting hardware still continuing to make hardware which Asterisk works on)? Nothwithstanding the almost-unparseable syntax, let's not feed this troll

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Business Edition

2005-07-23 Thread Brian West
Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very valid point. /b On Jul 23, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Brian Capouch wrote: Aidan Van Dyk wrote: Is this indicative to how Digium people respond to everything (including the company that built the first asterisk-supporting hardware still continuing to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Business Edition

2005-07-23 Thread Darren Nickerson
Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aidan isn't a troll he does raise a very valid point. Which was, I presume, that companies that once collaborated on Asterisk development such as Sangoma don't find themselves on friendly terms with Digium now that they're competing for * implementors $$s? If

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Aidan Van Dyk wrote: So what are they planning on doing with the Google Summer of Code results? http://code.google.com/summfaq.html#what_licenses_will_i_have What licenses will I have to choose from? This depends on your mentoring organization. For instance if Google is your mentoring

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread Lee Howard
Aidan Van Dyk wrote: Kevin P. Fleming wrote: The first two statements are true; the third is not. While you can certainly distribute the code you contribute to us via any other means you wish (under any other license you wish, including the GPL), the Digium Asterisk source tree cannot

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote: Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money. It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric. Yes but are the chicks free? -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread Lee Howard
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote: Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money. It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric. Yes but are the chicks free? Were there many chicks at Astricon? Lee.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread Kevin Walsh
Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote: Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money. It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric. Yes but are the chicks free? All except for the binary ones. -- _/ _/

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: RE: Business Edition

2005-07-22 Thread trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:26 +0100, Kevin Walsh wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote: Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money. It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric. Yes but are the