I had the same issue. did you ever find a solution. The Fritz card
worked fine with FC2, but no go with FC3, I think it has to do with
udev.
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:36:17 +0100, Bruno Hertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Though you probably won't use them, I'd still like to mention fyi th
Shoval Tomer wrote:
Hi all.
Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
Depends. If you have already chosen FC3, then I would assume that you
are comfortable with its limitations (services are community rather than
vendor based, there is a fair bit of experimental
Shoval Tomer wrote:
Hi all.
Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
For the same reason you should not use Fedora Core line for ANY
production system, as it designers intend it to be an experimental
branch. In particular, FC3 has the NSA's SELinux patches integrat
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:06:53 -0500, jeff jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw that you have * running on fc3. Which kernel? I had it running on
> the older kernels, but not on 2.6.9-1.724_FC3smp. Did you have to do
> anything special besides the udev stuff? Any info or links would be
> great...
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 07:41 +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote:
> I have it running on a FC2 box and on a FC3 box - no probs.
>
> I have just found out why my S100U adaptor won't work though.
> Apparently the S100U driver (wcusb) won't work on 2.6.x kernels, only
> 2.4.x... Bummer.
Hello,
I saw that y
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 06:25, Patrick Conroy wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
> >
> > I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat
> > 9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does.
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:03:32PM -0700, Michael Welter said:
> Walt Reed wrote:
> >
> >Another option is installing a good SATA controller like the 3ware.
> >Drives show up as SCSI, and even fairly old distro's work out of the box
> >with them. Most onboard controllers are pretty crappy - avoid P
First of all,
Thanks to all of you who replied to my post.
I have tried setting up FC 3 on a system here to check if asterisk
compiles OK (even though I have no Digium hardware here) and to save
time for the guy on site later.
Installing FC 3 is simple, very much like other red hat versions.
I
> Hi all.
>
> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
>
> I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat
> 9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does.
>
> We are only familiar with red hat and are in a point in time
trator
Tel. 602.896.4729
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] kind of urgent
I have * working on FC2
I have * working on FC2 with SATA drives.
I would wait to go FC3 untill it matures a bit.
Hope this help
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:32:24 +0200, Shoval Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
>
> I'm not looking to star
Walt Reed wrote:
Another option is installing a good SATA controller like the 3ware.
Drives show up as SCSI, and even fairly old distro's work out of the box
with them. Most onboard controllers are pretty crappy - avoid Promise
and their fake RAID.
Don't the SATA drives also show-up as SCSI devices
I just deployed an * system using FC3 and it is woking nicely for 1
and half weeks without a restart. this is what I get running uptime:
13:50:44 up 10 days, 23:23, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00
I'm using it with the follwing:
Apache, for flash op
TFTP, for cisco phones.
and a digium td
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Leif Madsen said:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:32:24 +0200, Shoval Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
> >
> > I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat
> >
Though you probably won't use them, I'd still like to mention fyi that
proprietary AVM Fritz PCI Card drivers didn't work for me on FC3. They
did on Debian Sarge.
Regards, Bruno.
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:32 +0200, Shoval Tomer wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 f
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:32:24 +0200, Shoval Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
>
> I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat
> 9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does.
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:08:06PM -0500, Gary G. Hendershot said:
>
> Try WhiteBox Linux ... It's a freeware clone of Redhat Enterprise Linux ...
> Its available for download in ISO CD image form (3 CD's required) ...
> Installs and configures just like Redhat ... Am using it now with SATA
> dri
Andy Burns wrote:
Michael Welter wrote:
In the zaptel directory, find the file README.udev. Find the "#
Section for zaptel device" and take those five lines ("KERNEL=...) and
stick them in the file /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules and then reboot.
Thanks for the reply, but as I mentioned those d
Raymond McKay wrote:
If it helps any, I have Asterisk Running on FC3 with no issues. The
udev thing was initially tricky for me, but I'm used to it now.
Same here. And Critch says that, if you're not sure about the RH kernel
patches, just download the vanilla kernel from http://kernel.org.
Mi
Michael Welter wrote:
In the zaptel directory, find the file README.udev. Find the "# Section
for zaptel device" and take those five lines ("KERNEL=...) and stick
them in the file /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules and then reboot.
Thanks for the reply, but as I mentioned those didn't work for me :
In the zaptel directory, find the file README.udev. Find the "#
Section for zaptel device" and take those five lines ("KERNEL=...) and
stick them in the file /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules and then
reboot.
If it helps any, I have Asterisk Running on FC3 with no issues. The
udev thing was in
Try WhiteBox Linux ... It's a freeware clone of Redhat Enterprise Linux ...
Its available for download in ISO CD image form (3 CD's required) ...
Installs and configures just like Redhat ... Am using it now with SATA
drives ... Works well with Asterisk ... Should be able to find a download
site
Andy Burns wrote:
Shoval Tomer wrote:
Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
when I tried the X100P drivers on FC3 I had problems with udev, the
workaround didn't work for me, maybe things have improved since ...
___
As
Shoval Tomer wrote:
Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
when I tried the X100P drivers on FC3 I had problems with udev, the
workaround didn't work for me, maybe things have improved since ...
___
Asterisk-Users mailin
Shoval Tomer wrote:
Hi all.
Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system?
I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat
9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does.
If you didn't have a problem with RH9 then why are you conc
25 matches
Mail list logo
