PJSIP will use some memory while it's loaded, even if nothing is going
on. The PJSIP allocations there don't seem alarming.
json.c is using an abnormally large amount of memory, though stasis uses
JSON under the hood so that may be the ultimate culprit. You also didn't
answer the previous
I think PJSIP never releases memory
This Is without any open calls.
Every command is very slow.
rasterisk -x "memory show allocations" |sort -t" " -n -k1 | tail -20
25192 bytes allocated by sip_options_contact_statuses_alloc() line
415 of res_pjsip/pjsip_options.c
25216 bytes
On 7/13/2023 8:10 PM, Federico wrote:
This is asterisk 16.30.1, after 1 hours, with 17 contacts, yet we need
to kill it every two hours because it stops processing calls.
...
160393938 bytes in 2227792 allocations in file stasis_message.c
440540801 bytes in 8647565 allocations in
A memory leak can be challenging to diagnose, but there are several steps
you can take to identify the cause within your Asterisk/FreePBX setup.
Here's a general approach to help you find the module or component
responsible for the memory leak:
Monitor System Resources
Identify Suspected Modules
On 7/8/2023 5:32 PM, Federico wrote:
I am using Asterisk 16.30 inside Freepbx, with commercial modules,
purchased from Sangoma and Symphony. After a few hours my memory usage
reaches 900 GB, no kidding, in a box with 1 TB of RAM. The question
is: how can I determine what is causing the
If you are not a developer and are not capable of identifying the leak -
broadly or specifically, at the very least you need to provide details,
log output, and/or other material evidence relevant to the circumstances
of the memory leak.
There is absolutely nothing productive anyone can tell
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:04:29AM +, frangky robert wrote:
Hi everyones,
I have a production server using asterisk 1.6.0.6
using php as an IVR and mssql server (on other machine)
My server attached a Sangoma A104 card (4xT1 card)
i have a problem with memory leak on that server
Mitch,
I was told that 'top' can be misleading because of the fact that Linux
will generally use free space and allocate it to cache. Try running
your tests with the 'free' command and see if there really is a memory
leak. I think the real concern is the fact that calls start dropping
once
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:59:20AM +0200, Arjan Kroon wrote:
Hi,
I'm using res_perl with asterisk 1.0.0. And after running asterisk a
couply of months, I see that the process asterisk take a lot on memory.
And asterisk will freeze.
If I look in the logging I see that the last
Thanks,
Can you maybe give me an example of such a build-in option sebuuging.
Arjan Kroon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: maandag 10 juli 2006 11:19
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
Hi Attilla -
So, this left me only one conclusion. The application with the memory
leak is Asterisk.
I know every situation is different, but I just thought that I'd point
out that I have machines running 1.2.7.1 that I haven't restarted in
months. Of course, 1.2.7.1 hasn't been out that
I'm also not an expert, but could it as any relationship with your Telephony card drivers??Which Telephony boards do u use?On 5/29/06, Attilla de Groot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All,
First off all, this is my first mail to this mailing-list, so if I amdoing something wrong please tell me. And
Hardware platform and specs? Call volume? Any messages in your logs?
I had this problem on an Itanium2 box, went away when I downgraded to
a Xeon.
Attilla de Groot wrote:
Hi All,
First off all, this is my first mail to this mailing-list, so if I am
doing something wrong please tell me.
Marco Mouta wrote:
I'm also not an expert, but could it as any relationship with your
Telephony card drivers??
Which Telephony boards do u use?
None. :)
I only use Asterisk as an VoIP pbx. Only the zaptel drivers installed
for ztdummy as a timer interface.
Greetings,
Attilla
Steve Totaro wrote:
Hardware platform and specs? Call volume? Any messages in your
logs? I had this problem on an Itanium2 box, went away when I
downgraded to a Xeon.
Hi Steve,
At this moment I don't have real acurate statistics. But think of 40
calls a day. So nothing fancy I think. And
May be updatedb or some other such heavy application, which runs at
night is causing heavy load on the system and spoils the working of
asterisk.
See if this phenomenon happens at the same time of the day everyday. Also, see what processes run at *that time*.
Cheers,
Vij
On 5/29/06, Attilla de
Vij wrote:
May be updatedb or some other such heavy application, which runs at
night is causing heavy load on the system and spoils the working of
asterisk.
See if this phenomenon happens at the same time of the day everyday.
Also, see what processes run at *that time*.
Cheers,
Vij
Hi
Is there any chance you're connecting to a remote share using CIFS?
What does slabtop look like on your machines?
Regards,
--
Anthony Rodgers
Business Systems Analyst
District of North Vancouver
Web: http://www.dnv.org
RSS Feed: http://www.dnv.org/rss.asp
On 29-May-06, at 8:35 AM, Attilla
Anthony Rodgers wrote:
Is there any chance you're connecting to a remote share using CIFS?
What does slabtop look like on your machines?
I would like to answer both question, but I don't know what CIFS of
slabtop is. But I'm sure you can tell me.
Greetings,
Attilla
Attilla de Groot wrote:
Vij wrote:
May be updatedb or some other such heavy application, which runs at
night is causing heavy load on the system and spoils the working of
asterisk.
See if this phenomenon happens at the same time of the day everyday.
Also, see what processes run at *that
Attilla de Groot wrote:
Anthony Rodgers wrote:
Is there any chance you're connecting to a remote share using CIFS?
What does slabtop look like on your machines?
I would like to answer both question, but I don't know what CIFS of
slabtop is. But I'm sure you can tell me.
will be
resolved ?
Thanks
Walter
--- Original Message below ---
Message: 20
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:42:44 -0700
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Memory leak in asterisk CVS
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users
leak issue will be
resolved ?
Thanks
Walter
--- Original Message below ---
Message: 20
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:42:44 -0700
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Memory leak in asterisk CVS
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Known issue. This was reverted later.
Check the thread on the mailing list
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-July/116246.html
Thanks,
Erik
On 7/16/05, Walter Klomp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My Asterisk CVS is apparently not doing much (other than keeping SIP
IAX2
You can turn on Asterisk's internal malloc debugging in the Makefile.
That can help track down the problem.
Haven't found anything with that.
from show memory summary:
200203 bytes allocated 1444 units total
and after lifting the MGCP handset
200213 bytes allocated 1444 units total
It'd be
You can turn on Asterisk's internal malloc debugging in the Makefile.
That can help track down the problem.
Mark
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
hi all
seems there's a memory leak in asterisk somewhere. probably in chan_mgcp. It
seems like 2048kB is allocated but not
26 matches
Mail list logo
