RE: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-23 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
Hello, Ok, few bad words about A200. Our company is based in Lithuania. Our company used SPA-3000, but because of echo problems we are not using them anymore. Now we are trying our luck with Sangoma A200 but the following problem occurred on few systems we installed. When calling person

RE: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-23 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
Hello, Ok, few bad words about A200. Our company is based in Lithuania. Our company used SPA-3000, but because of echo problems we are not using them anymore. Now we are trying our luck with Sangoma A200 but the following problem occurred on few systems we installed. When calling person

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-12 Thread Mike Dent
On 8/9/06, Stephen G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I'm looking to set up a home-office PBX/Asterisk lab using a VIA EPIA motherboard as an always on, low powered solution. Hi Stephen, I have an A200 with 1 x FXO module board in it. I'm in the Uk using a BT line and am having a lot of

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-11 Thread Wireless
if the power / asterisk fails. Regards Harvey UK - Original Message - From: Stephen G [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dana Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]; asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200 Dana, Thank

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-11 Thread Tom
Stephen, FWIW I have not used the SPA-3000 but we just took delivery of an A200d yesterday and installed it in our asterisk server. Had it up and running in a couple of hours. We were previously using a PRI with a Lucent TNT gateway that has hardware echo suppression built in. We are

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-10 Thread Stephen G
Dana, Thank you very much for your very detailed response. Yuo are the second one to have recommended going with a PCI card. I think that I will take your advice and do that instead of the SPA-3000. Even if I need two FXO ports some day, the price of two SPA-3000 cards (and all the extra

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-09 Thread Rich Adamson
Stephen G wrote: Hi there, I'm looking to set up a home-office PBX/Asterisk lab using a VIA EPIA motherboard as an always on, low powered solution. I am trying to find out the differences between a solution using an external ATA (like the Sipura SPA-3000) or an internal PCI card (like the

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-09 Thread Stephen G
Rich, Thanks for the quick reply and your advice. My main goal is to build a small, energy efficient, always on server that will be able to run Asterisk and connect up to the PSTN, with FAX ability. The PCI card makes the solution cleaner, but it is harder to find small cases/motherboards

Re: [asterisk-users] Sipura SPA-3000 vs Sangoma A200

2006-08-09 Thread Dana Harding
Stephen, In my experience setting up an office PBX, I started with several SPA-3000's and eventually decided to go with an A200d. There were two reasons for changing to the A200: 1. Hardware echo canceller. Despite all the configuration settings I tried, there was always a faint echo with