On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Scott Laird wrote:
Why stop there--you can beam pre-recorded messages to phones without a
person or phone line ever being involved. You could send hundreds of
[...]
That's right. Here in Hamburg, Germany one day before our elections my
phone rang and there was a
Walt Reed wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Scott Laird said:
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Loek Gijben wrote:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for
At 10:09 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
John Todd wrote:
At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
Gang,
[snip]
/Soren
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it.
- Aristotle
Ok, so we moved here from *-dev, no problem... ;-)
At 10:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Loek Gijben wrote:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like businesses.
Imagine a telemarketeer script that dials lists of VoIP
John Todd wrote:
At 10:09 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
John Todd wrote:
At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
Gang,
[snip]
/Soren
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a
thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
Ok, so we moved
Christoph Rothe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
That's right. Here in Hamburg, Germany one day before our elections
my phone rang and there was a recording from one of the big parties
that reminded me to vote the right ones ;-(
It could of course have been a joe-job by another party...
--
John Todd wrote:
and deep pockets to champion something for a monetary loss. So, Duane,
want to put your ENUM tools to good use? (see my post of a few minutes
Would be happy to if there was funding in it for the other enum
activities we're currently under taking, then of course not being based
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
- Original Message -
From: John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: VoIP SPAM, what's next ?
At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
Gang,
Do anyone have a
John Todd wrote:
At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote:
Gang,
[snip]
/Soren
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it.
- Aristotle
Ok, so we moved here from *-dev, no problem... ;-)
VOIP Spam is actually pretty trivial to
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like businesses.
Imagine a telemarketeer script that dials lists of VoIP addresses. Instead of having
to pay for each call
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loek Gijben) writes:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like businesses.
I got one the other day, but it turns out it was a buddy trying
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Loek Gijben wrote:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like businesses.
Imagine a telemarketeer script that dials lists of VoIP addresses.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Scott Laird said:
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Loek Gijben wrote:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like
Original Message -
From: Walt Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: VoIP SPAM, what's next ?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Scott Laird said:
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Loek Gijben wrote
On Aug 10, 2004, at 4:34 PM, Walt Reed wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Scott Laird said:
Why stop there--you can beam pre-recorded messages to phones without a
person or phone line ever being involved. You could send hundreds of
calls per minute without paying for more then a
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: VoIP SPAM, what's next ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loek Gijben) writes:
hank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
voip spam?
I have never gotten any yet.
It's is just waiting for the first one to arrive..
The mechanics are just too appealing for spam-like businesses.
I got one the other
16 matches
Mail list logo
