On 17.12.18 at 11:52 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Another question: is there any use case for 183 Session Progress w/o
>> SDP? IOW: Is a 183 Session
>> Progress just a bug of the ISP? If so, problem could be solved by
>> dropping
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
> Another question: is there any use case for 183 Session Progress w/o
> SDP? IOW: Is a 183 Session
> Progress just a bug of the ISP? If so, problem could be solved by
> dropping each 183 package w/o SDP.
Nothing really comes to mind
On 12.12.18 at 19:43 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> The problem: The extension doesn't create a ringback locally, because
>> it most probably expects it to
>> be sent by the callee - but the callee doesn't send anything (not
>>
On 12.12.18 at 19:43 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> The problem: The extension doesn't create a ringback locally, because
>> it most probably expects it to
>> be sent by the callee - but the callee doesn't send anything (not
>>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
> The problem: The extension doesn't create a ringback locally, because
> it most probably expects it to
> be sent by the callee - but the callee doesn't send anything (not
> surprising, because there has been
> no SDP).
>
> Or
