Re: [asterisk-users] Register = plain text password

2014-01-22 Thread A J Stiles
On Wednesday 22 January 2014, José Pablo Méndez Soto wrote: Hello, Is there anyway to encrypt or scramble a bit the secret used to register with a provider? Im talking about the register = fromuser@fromdomain:secret@host directive in

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 11.7.0 not receiving registration from local address

2014-01-22 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Hi, I face a problem which look like the same as David with his thread Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address. I had an Asterisk (Elastix) working well in a VM (Debian Wheezy - KVM) having IP 192.168.111.14, my phone network is in the range 192.168.10.x I updated lately to 11.7.0

Re: [asterisk-users] core show channels truncates channel names?

2014-01-22 Thread Michelle Dupuis
Thanks that's perfect! I would use the AMI but I have to run against Asterisk 1.4 and the ami command 'coreshowchannels' didn't appear until Asterisk 1.6 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11.7.0 not receiving registration from local address

2014-01-22 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Le 22/01/2014 14:01, Administrator TOOTAI a écrit : Hi, I face a problem which look like the same as David with his thread Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address. I had an Asterisk (Elastix) working well in a VM (Debian Wheezy - KVM) having IP 192.168.111.14, my phone network is in

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address

2014-01-22 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Le 20/01/2014 03:51, David Cunningham a écrit : Hi, We have a Kamailio and Asterisk cluster, both machines being on a real 103.x IP address and also on a 172.x OpenVPN address. The problem is that when Kamailo receives a call from the VPN and forwards it to the Asterisk server on it's 103.x

[asterisk-users] ISDN Cause Code 47 Errors

2014-01-22 Thread Dale Noll
We fairly recently switched service providers for our 4 PRI circuits. Since that time, we started to notice some failed inbound calls. These calls terminate with an ISDN cause code 47 'resource unavailble'. Most of the time I see this error on the first or second channel on the second span in a

[asterisk-users] Mailinglist Digium IP-phones : provisioning Digium D70

2014-01-22 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello, is there a mailinglist where I can post questions regarding Digium IP-phones ? I have the following question : I'm trying to provision a Digium D70 IP-phone from a https provisioning server. The Digium D70 contacts the provisioning server correctly but seems to log in with the

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN Cause Code 47 Errors

2014-01-22 Thread Richard Mudgett
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Dale Noll dn...@wi.rr.com wrote: We fairly recently switched service providers for our 4 PRI circuits. Since that time, we started to notice some failed inbound calls. These calls terminate with an ISDN cause code 47 'resource unavailble'. Most of the time I

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN Cause Code 47 Errors

2014-01-22 Thread Andres
[Jan 14 12:56:04] VERBOSE[13262] chan_dahdi.c: [Jan 14 12:56:04] PRI Span: 4 TEI=0 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 6918/0x1B06) (Sent from originator) [Jan 14 12:56:04] VERBOSE[13262] chan_dahdi.c: [Jan 14 12:56:04] PRI Span: 4 Message Type: RELEASE COMPLETE (90) [Jan 14

Re: [asterisk-users] qualify=yes outboundproxy

2014-01-22 Thread Nick Lemberger
I am sure I need outboundproxy :) We use Kamailio in front of our softswitch as a type of firewall and because not all sip endpoints can set the headers such that they will work with said softswitch. Calling messages (and calling!) work just fine through the proxy - that setting just doesn't

Re: [asterisk-users] qualify=yes outboundproxy

2014-01-22 Thread Nick Cameo
We use opensips as a type of firewall as well and don't need to set qualify=yes. N -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

[asterisk-users] Question about Asterisk 12

2014-01-22 Thread James Wystead
Okay - maybe I'm just suffering from a moment of horrible ADD - but, I'm a little lost. I see that Asterisk 12 has a nice REST API - very nice - something I can use. However, and this is gonna sound dumb - but all the CLI commands are different now. What did I miss? Can anyone, please, anyone

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about Asterisk 12

2014-01-22 Thread Jacob.E.Miles
Maybe it's just me if I'm not mistaken the three things you listed are usually configured using the config files not on CLI. Jacob From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James Wystead Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about Asterisk 12

2014-01-22 Thread John Kiniston
I looked on http://www.voip-info.org - maybe I missed it? The Digium/Asterisk site - I see all sorts of cool things about the REST API, but CLI - maybe I missed it!!?? - again, I could be looking in the wrong place? https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Home To my knowledge the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk not receiving call from VPN address

2014-01-22 Thread David Cunningham
Hello, We tried Asterisk 1.8 and 1.6, but not yet Asterisk 11. We'll keep it in mind. In the meantime we've decided to try a different network configuration instead, so the VPN network is separated from what Asterisk sees. Thanks for all the advice given. On 23 January 2014 00:42,

[asterisk-users] type=peer vs type=user (depricated?)

2014-01-22 Thread Michelle Dupuis
I'm looking at setting type=peer vs type=user (in both IAX and SIP conf entries), and I found a comment attributed to digium (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+user+vs+peer) in 2005 that type=user is depricated and that we should only use type=peer Is that still correct? Will

[asterisk-users] AMI eventmask question

2014-01-22 Thread Michelle Dupuis
I'm creating an AMI client and I only want to get newchannel events (as well as responses to any actions I initiate). What would I set the eventmask to to only get the newchannel events? For anyone else looking...is there a table somewhere online that maps events to their eventmask

Re: [asterisk-users] qualify=yes outboundproxy

2014-01-22 Thread Nick Lemberger
We use opensips as a type of firewall as well and don't need to set qualify=yes. As I said, I don't *need* to set qualify=yes for things to work. It's just that trunk failover takes ~30 seconds. If the first/main trunk in an outbound route is down, outbound calls just sit with dead air for a

Re: [asterisk-users] qualify=yes outboundproxy

2014-01-22 Thread Nick Lemberger
We use opensips as a type of firewall as well and don't need to set qualify=yes. As I said, I don't *need* to set qualify=yes for things to work. It's just that trunk failover takes ~30 seconds. If the first/main trunk in an outbound route is down, outbound calls just sit with dead air for a