[asterisk-users] Re: What means: Request to schedule in the past?!?!

2007-03-03 Thread Martin Joseph
On 2007-02-22 04:22:20 -0800, Frederico Madeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi guys, My asterisk is show me some errors on line registration. This message appear on console: Request to schedule in the past?!?! What it mean ? Thanks. I see this message all the time on my lowely powerPC mac

RE: [asterisk-users] Need comparison between PBXtra, Trixbox, Thirdlane, Druid, Aheeva etc.

2007-03-03 Thread Senad Jordanovic
Hi, For a customer, I am looking for a good and reliable Asterisk based system. Five servers will be installed at different locations and will be linked together with each other. This system will work as a call center as well. It has to be a stable and reliable. Customer also needs GUIs for

Re: [asterisk-users] Somebody can help me?

2007-03-03 Thread Andrea Seghezzi
Ok, thank you very much. I've just installed on the pc the trixbox Linux distribution. The PBX now is ready? I think that i have only to configure the other lans' pcs, didn't i? Please answer me... Have a nice day Andrea 2007/2/24, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at

Re: [asterisk-users] How to fail an AGI

2007-03-03 Thread Lenz
You could set a dialplan variable in the AGI so that it's pretty easy to tell what happened in the AGI. About the code 0, the funny part is that you see AGI Script completed, returning 0 even if the AGI does not exist, or is not executable. This should be a good candidate for improvement

Re: [asterisk-users] gtalk2voip and Asterisk

2007-03-03 Thread Mani Sridhar
hi, i was able to get this working with google talk. i entered [EMAIL PROTECTED] using the gtalk2voip.com website's invite box, and as a result, saw a request from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be added as a buddy in my google talk contact list. i accepted the request. in my asterisk dialplan, i have

Re: [asterisk-users] FAX using T38

2007-03-03 Thread Steve Underwood
Zoa wrote: So does asterisk (Albeit with a commercial package) http://www.attractel.com/t38.html I'll do it for 30% less than they quote. :-) Lee Howard wrote: Matt Riddell [NZ] wrote: Does OpenPBX do a T.38 gateway then? Yes, it does. Lee. Steve

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Sending SMS

2007-03-03 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Al Bochter wrote: I don't see why the cost to send SMS is around .15 each. What does the gateway know that I don't know about sending the SMS. I just think .15 for each SMS send is high. Or am I just over looking something? You're missing nothing; The telcos have us by

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Java w/ Threads

2007-03-03 Thread Jesus Mogollon
The best option would be to use AstManProxy and connect your event manager to it. Jesus On 3/2/07, Doug Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I ain't much of a Java programmer, but... Can the Asterisk Java API be written with threads? Ie, I need to connect to multiple Asterisk systems

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Sending SMS

2007-03-03 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 12:01:58PM +, Gordon Henderson wrote: You're missing nothing; The telcos have us by the short curlys. For them, it's money for old rope. They probably (in the UK at least) make many times more money through TXT messages than voice. The base rate here is about

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Sending SMS

2007-03-03 Thread Steve Totaro
Gordon Henderson wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Al Bochter wrote: I don't see why the cost to send SMS is around .15 each. What does the gateway know that I don't know about sending the SMS. I just think .15 for each SMS send is high. Or am I just over looking something? You're missing

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Java w/ Threads

2007-03-03 Thread Stefan Reuter
Jesus Mogollon wrote: The best option would be to use AstManProxy and connect your event manager to it. why would adding a new system in between be better than directly connecting to multiple Asterisk servers? =Stefan -- reuter network consulting Neusser Str. 110 50760 Koeln Germany Telefon:

Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Polycom reject button

2007-03-03 Thread Jason Walker
Good Idea, but when the user has to do nothing is better for my users! Thanks JAson Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: Another option is to have the user hit the forward button on their phone and manually type in their cellphone number when they're going to be out of the office. Jason

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: CallerID Name not being sent on outboundPRI trunk

2007-03-03 Thread Mike Lynchfield
From what i was told via the GT guys at bell The customer should send I 1C Standard Facility Length = 21 9F Serv Discrim Networking Extensions PDU Component Begins (hex) 8B0100A10F020101... instead of: I 28 Display Length = 9 E Display .JIMBOB so we

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: CallerID Name not being sent on outboundPRI trunk

2007-03-03 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:52:38AM -0500, Mike Lynchfield wrote: From what i was told via the GT guys at bell The customer should send I 1C Standard Facility Length = 21 9F Serv Discrim Networking Extensions PDU Component Begins (hex) 8B0100A10F020101...

RE: [asterisk-users] Need comparison between PBXtra, Trixbox, Thirdlane, Druid, Aheeva etc.

2007-03-03 Thread shadowym
I'll second that, CentOS 4.4 + FreePBX 2.1.3 + Asterisk 1.2.13 + Sangoma A200D + Aastra 9133i's running 4 months without a reboot and no memory leaks fielding about 150 calls a day. Everyone loves the system. These are normal users used to tradtitional phone systems. I would not go as far as

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Sending SMS

2007-03-03 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3 Mar 2007, at 15:02, Steve Totaro wrote: Text messaging is not that big in the US for some reason. Well anyways, on my T-Mobile phone, I have an unlimited text message package that cost $15/mo. I am not sure how many constitutes

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: CallerID Name not being sent on outboundPRI trunk

2007-03-03 Thread Mike Lynchfield
hey sorry for caps my bad. and yes i will , sub to -dev however i tought that for that 1 post i shouldn't go trough the troubles of doing that. and that someone could already be on the -dev form this thread , i also assumed threads where like sub channels where people could isolate from the

Re: Re: [asterisk-users] svn 1.4 - mp3 s upport and changing the installation dire ctory

2007-03-03 Thread tzieleniewski
Thank you. Please help me with two more issues. tzieleniewski wrote: 1. In many docs on the web there is an info to make asterisk by invoking #make mpg123 in order to have the mp3 support, when I try to do it this way make informs that there are no such make rules. Those documents are

Re: Re: [asterisk-users] svn 1.4 - mp3 support and changing the installation directory

2007-03-03 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 06:24:29PM +0100, tzieleniewski wrote: Thank you. Please help me with two more issues. tzieleniewski wrote: right now I don't have any digium cards installed in my PC so the only thing I need at the moment is the ztdummy module for the purpose of timer

RE: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.1 Released

2007-03-03 Thread Michelle Dupuis
Can one do an in-place update to 1.4.1 from 1.4.0 ? (Just compile and install) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asterisk Development Team Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 7:04 PM To: undisclosed-recipients: Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk

[asterisk-users] hanging an asterisk box off of a PBX analog extension

2007-03-03 Thread Mike D'Ambrogia
Wanting to connect my asterisk box off of 2 unused analog extensions on the non* PBX system. Can I bring those lines in to * on XP100 FXO cards? Any special wiring/open loop issues to watch for? The desired config is inbound PRI - non* PBX, attendant picks up and if caller wants services on

[asterisk-users] creating new asterisk application

2007-03-03 Thread Giedrius Augys
Hi, I'm writing asterisk application in C language. I need to know what is state of my asterisk user, so I have found command: ast_device_state(data); . So if my IP phone is reachable I get status 1

RE: [asterisk-users] Asterisk - e164 (enum) lookup confused

2007-03-03 Thread Yuan LIU
From: Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:30:42 -0700 I would like to implement enum lookup in my dial plan but searching for solution / implementation I'm getting confused what is current standard. On some pages I read that the ENUMLOOKUP is not in development anymore and

Re: [asterisk-users] How to fail an AGI

2007-03-03 Thread Yuan LIU
From: Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:37:29 +0100 You could set a dialplan variable in the AGI so that it's pretty easy to tell what happened in the AGI. About the code 0, the funny part is that you see AGI Script completed, returning 0 even if the AGI does not exist, or is

Re: [asterisk-users] hanging an asterisk box off of a PBX analog extension

2007-03-03 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora
On 3/3/07, Mike D'Ambrogia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wanting to connect my asterisk box off of 2 unused analog extensions on the non* PBX system. Sounds workable. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list

Re: [asterisk-users] hanging an asterisk box off of a PBX analog extension

2007-03-03 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Mike D'Ambrogia wrote: Wanting to connect my asterisk box off of 2 unused analog extensions on the non* PBX system. Can I bring those lines in to * on XP100 FXO cards? Any special wiring/open loop issues to watch for? You might be better off with one TDM400P card with the

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom reject button

2007-03-03 Thread Stephen Bosch
Jason Walker wrote: I have users in my dialplan that go from SIP to Cell When they are at their desk and they hit reject call, it goes to the next thing in the dialplan, thus transferring to their cell. Not what they want. Is it possible to change the reject button to make it go to voice

Re: [asterisk-users] REMOTE CRASH FIX

2007-03-03 Thread Stephen Bosch
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Mike Lynchfield wrote: Please note that we are available to fix the current REMOTE crash that affects Asterisk/openpbx/trixbox and crashes these systems via a malformed packet please contacts use if you need a hand to patch your systems. This list is for

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.1 Released

2007-03-03 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Michelle Dupuis wrote: Can one do an in-place update to 1.4.1 from 1.4.0 ? (Just compile and install) ./configure make update worked here. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or

[asterisk-users] dial question

2007-03-03 Thread Hall, Eric M.
D Not sure why this works exten = _3665[0-9],1,goto(test|${EXTEN}|1) but this does not. exten = _366[50-59],1,goto(test|${EXTEN}|1) I would like to route 36650 - 36700 to a Context 'test' however I'm only able to get 10 to work at a time. Any ideas? Any help would be great!

Re: [asterisk-users] hanging an asterisk box off of a PBX analog extension

2007-03-03 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote: On 3/3/07, Mike D'Ambrogia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wanting to connect my asterisk box off of 2 unused analog extensions on the non* PBX system. Sounds workable. Generally if you do this Asterisk will have a tough time knowing when to hang up the line.

Re: [asterisk-users] dial question

2007-03-03 Thread Alvin Austin
Hall, Eric M. wrote: Not sure why this works exten = _3665[0-9],1,goto(test|${EXTEN}|1) but this does not. exten = _366[50-59],1,goto(test|${EXTEN}|1) I would like to route 36650 – 36700 to a Context ‘test’ however I’m only able to get 10 to work at a time. Any ideas? The square brackets

Re: [asterisk-users] dial question

2007-03-03 Thread C F
The second example is for a four digit extension. while the first is for a five digit extension. everything within the brackets is meant for just one digit. On 3/3/07, Hall, Eric M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: D Not sure why this works exten = _3665[0-9],1,goto(test|${EXTEN}|1) but this

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: CallerID Name not being sent on outbound PRI trunk

2007-03-03 Thread C F
Mike there aint such thing as outbound caller id name that you send and a pots subscriber sees. so drop it. On 3/3/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:52:38AM -0500, Mike Lynchfield wrote: From what i was told via the GT guys at bell The customer should send

Re: [asterisk-users] Help: CallerID Name not being sent on outbound PRI trunk

2007-03-03 Thread Matt
Thanks I was just about to say this. You CAN'T send caller-id-name. To be able to set name you need to set it with Telcordia or whomever manages numbers in your country. On 3/3/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike there aint such thing as outbound caller id name that you send and a pots