Re: [asterisk-users] remote UPDATE command

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Wieling
Check the sip.conf.sample. 1.8 has several options related to the SIP UPDATE support. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Arstan Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:10 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digi

[asterisk-users] remote UPDATE command

2012-03-12 Thread Arstan
Hi guys, I am working on a setup where I have an Asterisk (1.6.2.7) with a SIP trunk to a provider's softswitch(IMS). Trunking works all ok, calling out and calling in. Except for the remote softswitch(IMS) will send UPDATE command(according to RFC 3311) and Asterisk does not accept and thus the ca

Re: [asterisk-users] Rate sheet "normalization"

2012-03-12 Thread Alex Balashov
On 03/12/2012 06:52 PM, Markus wrote: Now, if the "49" route of the first provider is cheaper, my system (a2billing) will still use the more expensive "4930" code because it is more specific. There is a great deal of wisdom in this approach that you may wish to consider carefully before aband

[asterisk-users] Rate sheet "normalization"

2012-03-12 Thread Markus
Hi, this question is not Asterisk specific, but since there are so many experts present on this list, maybe its OK to ask anyways. I'm having a hard time "normalizing" rate sheets from different providers. What I mean with this: the goal is to always get the cheapest rate for a given destina

Re: [asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 03/12/2012 03:38 PM, Steve Edwards wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar wrote: What will be impact on no of session when G729a is used? Assuming that transcoding is involved; if all the system is doing is passing through G.729A media streams, and recording them in unmixed G.729A form

Re: [asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Steve Edwards
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amit Patkar wrote: I have a server with 24 cores running at 2.4ghz and 16 GB RAM. How many concurrent SIP sessions I can run from single instance of Asterisk on this server? I wish to use G711 codec with echo cancel. And all calls needs to be recorded. What kind of capac

Re: [asterisk-users] Very slow faxing with Fax For Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
Che Switch to a Grandstream HT-701 or HT-502 and see if you get better results. The HT-286 has been discontinued for some time and the firmware has some major T.38 issues. Thanks Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.) 616-855-1030 Ext. 2003 From: "Chet W.

[asterisk-users] Very slow faxing with Fax For Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Chet W. Stevens
I have been testing Fax For Asterisk with an analog fax sitting behind a Grandstream Handytone 286. I have been sending a number of faxes but I find that they send extremely slow. In my most basic test of sending from the HT286 straight to a tiff image on Asterisk on the same subnet I am seeing

Re: [asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Wieling
There are no such statistics. Your usage patterns are unique to you and depend on many factors. If you must look for the information then look in the mailing list archives or on voip-info.org. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun

[asterisk-users] Capacity of single instance of Asterisk

2012-03-12 Thread Amit Patkar
Hi Can someome give tested and proven information on Asterisk capabilities? I have a server with 24 cores running at 2.4ghz and 16 GB RAM. How many concurrent SIP sessions I can run from single instance of Asterisk on this server? I wish to use G711 codec with echo cancel. And all calls need

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 03/12/2012 11:10 AM, Larry Moore wrote: Check Start & End RTP Ports match values set in /etc/asterisk/udptl.conf for udptlstart & udptlend This is unnecessary; the two endpoints are free to use different port ranges if they wish, it won't make any difference. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium,

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Larry Moore
On 12/03/2012 10:53 PM, Ishfaq Malik wrote: Thanks for the input so far. I'm going to keep plugging away and if anyone has any insights, they will be gladly appreciated. Ish In SIP Account Configuration on Draytek; Set Voice Active Detect to Off In Phone Settings on the Draytek; Enable Symm

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 14:53 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:11 -0400, Bryant Zimmerman wrote: > > Looking at the information you have sent in this posting in certainly > > appears that the 'f' option has indeed helped however you have > > another > > matter to overcome. > >

Re: [asterisk-users] German voice recognition

2012-03-12 Thread Danny Nicholas
To the best of my knowledge, your best options, not necessarily in order are: 1. Vestec ASR 2. Lumenvox ASR 3. google ASR (there was a good post in February about how to use this) 4. Sphynx ASR Options 1 and 2 are/were "recommended" by Digium. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun.

[asterisk-users] German voice recognition

2012-03-12 Thread Thorsten Göllner
Hi, I am looking (for the best) solution to recognize *german* words or simple phrases with a given number of words (eins, zwei drei etc. or hauptmenü, zurück etc.). Can somebody give me a good link? Can I find external service providers who can be accessed via ASR()? Best regards, -Thorsten

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Ishfaq Malik
. Now getting the following == Using UDPTL CoS mark 5 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [200@local:1] Goto("SIP/588-000b", "fax-in,s,1") -- Goto (fax-in,s,1) -- Executing [s@fax-in:1] Answer("SIP/588-000b", "") -- Executing

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDISendCallreroutingFacility

2012-03-12 Thread Mehdi Shirazi
for using this application it is enough to put this in chan_dahdi.conf ? ... context=incoming facilityenable=yes transfer=yes --- On Sat, 3/10/12, Karsten Wemheuer wrote: From: Karsten Wemheuer Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDISendCallreroutingFacility To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - No

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Wieling
Asterisk's peer matching changes between releases. Your best bet is to try it and see. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asgaroth Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:22 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.d

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Asgaroth
Hi, On 12/03/12 13:48, Eric Wieling wrote: Have you tried permit/deny on the peer? No, I've not tried this, however, will those entries be checked if the inbound call is not matched against the peer that those settings matched with? I'll have to research this option a little more. -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Asgaroth
Greetings back :) Greetings, That will depend on my SIP providers, I'm not sure if they swap their IP's indeed,and send calls down my way with alternating IP's, perhaps they're "smart" enough to only send calls down my way with the same IP that was bound with the registration request to begin w

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Eric Wieling
Have you tried permit/deny on the peer? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Guy Gold Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:45 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-reco

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Guy Gold
On Mon,Mar 12 01:33:PM, Asgaroth wrote: > Are you saying that the above scenario is working for you for > incoming calls? Greetings, That will depend on my SIP providers, I'm not sure if they swap their IP's indeed,and send calls down my way with alternating IP's, perhaps they're "smart" enough

Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-record SRV records

2012-03-12 Thread Asgaroth
Hi, I can report, at least from my side, on not having issue with SRV records, with Multiple SIP providers. Did not have issues at least with the 1.8 branch. Are you PBX's doing SRV lookups ? Yes, I do have the srv_lookup parameter set to "yes". What appears to be happening is that when the

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
ark 5 > == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 > -- Executing [200@local:1] Goto("SIP/588-", "fax-in,s,1") > -- Goto (fax-in,s,1) > -- Executing [s@fax-in:1] Answer("SIP/588-", "") > -- Executing [s@fax-in:2] Wait("SIP/588-0000&qu

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
o("SIP/588-", "fax-in,s,1") -- Goto (fax-in,s,1) -- Executing [s@fax-in:1] Answer("SIP/588-", "") -- Executing [s@fax-in:2] Wait("SIP/588-", "3") -- Executing [s@fax-in:3] Set("SIP/588-&qu

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Larry Moore
Executing [s@fax-in:3] Set("SIP/588-", "FAXFILE=/tmp/fax-588-20120312-092231.tiff") -- Executing [s@fax-in:4] ReceiveFAX("SIP/588-", "/tmp/fax-588-20120312-092231.tiff,f") -- Channel 'SIP/588-' receiving FAX &#

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with ReceiveFax

2012-03-12 Thread Ishfaq Malik
38 : 0 > Canceled : 0 > No FAX : 0 > Partial : 0 > Negotiation Failed : 0 > Train Failure : 0 > Protocol Error : 0 > IO Partial : 0 > IO Fail : 0 > > Digium T.38 > Licensed Channels: 1 &g

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 1.8.9.2 channel.c: Channel allocation failed

2012-03-12 Thread Christian Gansberger
Yes, I can give a higher ulimit, but I want to know why there were so much fd's. As I found out yesterday, the reason of running out of available file descriptors was: Some Agents in the Callcenter made ChanSpy on several Calls, but they didn't stop spying with *-key, just hangup the phone, and ke