Re: [asterisk-users] Users list email totals by year .
Am 30.12.2012 04:24, schrieb Jeff LaCoursiere: On 12/29/2012 05:20 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: 2003, 24471 2004, 48608 2005, 59116 2006, 41215 2007, 26414 2008, 20746 2009, 18304 2010, 14948 2011, 11588 2012, 7542 If you remove the top-posting thread, it may cut it in half again. j Yes. At least in half !! ;-) N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Problem with Speex codec
I'm trying to convert from MeetMe to Confbridge and one part of that is
handling the ending of a conference. So I'm taking the suggestion of
originating a call to the conference and doing:
same = n,Playback(conf-will-end-indigits/${WTIME}minutes)
That crashes Asterisk (with no core dump!) in the default configuration.
When I run it manually, I see the error message:
Fatal (internal) error in kiss_fft.c, line 294: KissFFT: max radix supported is
17
If I unload module codec_speex.so, everything works. If I playback files
other than conf-will-end, it also works.
Two questions:
(1) Why is that codec being used in the first place?
(2) Why it is generating that error when it is?
This the Asterisk 10.7.1 release.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] hanguptimeout option in asterisk 1.8
Hi ,
I have a problem with h and t option in asterisk 1.8 .
They don't work.
Option h and t don't work in following macro and in this macro
DeadAGI never run ?!
What is problem?!
any idea?
[macro-vt-record]
include = macro-vt-record-custom
exten = s,1,ExecIf(${ARG4} != ]?SET(TIMEOUT(absolute)=2))
exten =
s,n,Set(VTRECORDNAME=/tmp/voiceticket_${CALLERID(num)}-${CUT(UNIQUEID,\.,1)}-${CUT(UNIQUEID,\.,2)})
exten = s,n,Set(RECORDTICKET=)
exten = s,n,Set(ACTION=${ARG1})
exten = s,n,Set(QUEUENUM=${ARG2})
exten = s,n,Set(BEFORERECORDEDTIME=${STRFTIME(${EPOCH}||%Y-%m-%d
%H:%M:%S)})
exten = s,n,Record(${VTRECORDNAME}:wav)
exten =
s,n(saveticket),DeadAGI(pp-voiceticket.php,${ACTION},${VTRECORDNAME}.wav,${QUEUENUM},${BEFORERECORDEDTIME})
exten = T,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
exten = t,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
exten = t,n,Noop(hangup situation is not work yet)
exten = h,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
I saw these log when run this macro and hangup or timeout :
- Executing [s@voiceticket_customer-1:3] Macro(SIP/102-009f,
vt-record,add,0,vt-13-say-q,300,) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:1] ExecIf(SIP/102-009f, 300 !=
]?SET(TIMEOUT(absolute)=2)) in new stack
Channel will hangup at 2012-12-30 16:54:13.195 IRST.
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:2] Set(SIP/102-009f,
VTRECORDNAME=/tmp/voiceticket_102-1356873840-195) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:3] Set(SIP/102-009f,
RECORDTICKET=) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:4] Set(SIP/102-009f,
ACTION=add) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:5] Set(SIP/102-009f,
QUEUENUM=0) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:6] Set(SIP/102-009f,
BEFORERECORDEDTIME=Sun Dec 30 16:54:11 2012) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:7] Record(SIP/102-009f,
/tmp/voiceticket_102-1356873840-195:wav) in new stack
-- SIP/102-009f Playing 'beep.slin' (language 'en')
== Spawn extension (macro-vt-record, s, 7) exited non-zero on
'SIP/102-009f' in macro 'vt-record'
== Spawn extension (voiceticket_customer-1, s, 3) exited non-zero on
'SIP/102-009f'
Thanks,
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] hanguptimeout option in asterisk 1.8
In a condition (i.e. not using Set) when you put quotes on one side of the =
sign, then you need to put it on the other side of the = sign as well.
ExecIf(${ARG4} != ]?
I don't know if this is your specific problem, but if you don't fix it, it will
come back and bite you later.
I suspect jumping to h is handled by app_dial, so it may not work in IVRs.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of NassimAbedi
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:59 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] hanguptimeout option in asterisk 1.8
Hi ,
I have a problem with h and t option in asterisk 1.8 .
They don't work.
Option h and t don't work in following macro and in this macro DeadAGI
never run ?!
What is problem?!
any idea?
[macro-vt-record]
include = macro-vt-record-custom
exten = s,1,ExecIf(${ARG4} != ]?SET(TIMEOUT(absolute)=2)) exten =
s,n,Set(VTRECORDNAME=/tmp/voiceticket_${CALLERID(num)}-${CUT(UNIQUEID,\.,1)}-${CUT(UNIQUEID,\.,2)})
exten = s,n,Set(RECORDTICKET=)
exten = s,n,Set(ACTION=${ARG1})
exten = s,n,Set(QUEUENUM=${ARG2})
exten = s,n,Set(BEFORERECORDEDTIME=${STRFTIME(${EPOCH}||%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S)})
exten = s,n,Record(${VTRECORDNAME}:wav) exten =
s,n(saveticket),DeadAGI(pp-voiceticket.php,${ACTION},${VTRECORDNAME}.wav,${QUEUENUM},${BEFORERECORDEDTIME})
exten = T,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
exten = t,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
exten = t,n,Noop(hangup situation is not work yet) exten =
h,1,Goto(macro-vt-record,s,saveticket)
I saw these log when run this macro and hangup or timeout :
- Executing [s@voiceticket_customer-1:3] Macro(SIP/102-009f,
vt-record,add,0,vt-13-say-q,300,) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:1] ExecIf(SIP/102-009f, 300 !=
]?SET(TIMEOUT(absolute)=2)) in new stack Channel will hangup at 2012-12-30
16:54:13.195 IRST.
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:2] Set(SIP/102-009f,
VTRECORDNAME=/tmp/voiceticket_102-1356873840-195) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:3] Set(SIP/102-009f, RECORDTICKET=)
in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:4] Set(SIP/102-009f, ACTION=add) in
new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:5] Set(SIP/102-009f, QUEUENUM=0) in
new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:6] Set(SIP/102-009f,
BEFORERECORDEDTIME=Sun Dec 30 16:54:11 2012) in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-vt-record:7] Record(SIP/102-009f,
/tmp/voiceticket_102-1356873840-195:wav) in new stack
-- SIP/102-009f Playing 'beep.slin' (language 'en')
== Spawn extension (macro-vt-record, s, 7) exited non-zero on
'SIP/102-009f' in macro 'vt-record'
== Spawn extension (voiceticket_customer-1, s, 3) exited non-zero on
'SIP/102-009f'
Thanks,
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. If the poster wants to intersperse comments in the following text, they announce that at the top so readers know to look further down. Modern e-mail programs make it easy to figure out the history if you were not following the discussion closely. Ron On 29/12/2012 10:02 PM, Logan Bibby wrote: I suppose I'm one of the few people that remember the content of threads by subject and easily catch up... I'm also on my phone 99% of the time time and the way Gmail lays out emails makes top-posting beneficial to me. On Dec 29, 2012 8:57 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com mailto:ken...@gnat.com wrote: I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up. What's there to catch up with if you don't first read what the person is replying to? Do you think that everybody remembers every thread. Of what value is it to see something like No, that didn't work. *before* a description of what it was that didn't work. When people reply to an email, it's their responsibility, whether they top-post or bottom-post to remove unnecessary old message and keep just what's necessary to understand the email. One of the problems with top-posting is that it makes it easier to forget to do this. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Timeout(absolute) not working on transfer
Hi All,
Asterisk 1.4.22.1 on CentOS 5
I've configured my dialplan to limit the maximum call length on
outgoing calls. I've done this as I get the first hour of each call
free with my bundle but I pay through the nose if the call goes over
an hour.
Family members who live overseas sometimes ask me to transfer them to
UK landline numbers, which is fine by me as it doesn't cost me
provided they don't exceed the hour limit. However, I noticed a few
days ago that a call from my son (who lives in Australia) that I
transferred didn't time out.
Relevant snippets of extensions.conf follow.
The incoming (via SIP) call fetches up at the following:
exten = [munged],1,Goto(main,1)
exten = main,1,Log(NOTICE, Prefilter: call from ${CALLERID(num)})
exten = main,n,PrivacyManager(2,10)
exten = main,n,GotoIf($[${PRIVACYMGRSTATUS} = FAILED]?withheld,1)
exten = main,n,Log(NOTICE, Incoming call from ${CALLERID(num)})
exten = main,n,GotoIf($[${BLACKLIST()}]?banned,1)
exten = main,n,Set(CALLERID(name)=${DB(cidname/${CALLERID(num)})})
exten = main,n,Dial(${rgMain},${RINGTIME},t)
exten = main,n,Log(NOTICE, Call from ${CALLERID(num)} sent to voicemail)
exten = main,n,VoiceMail(main@default)
To transfer the call, I press # then dial the number, which is in the
form of 01nnn nn, and so should fetch up at the following:
exten = _01.,1,SET(Timeout(absolute)=3540)
exten = _01.,n,Dial(${UKGeographical}/${EXTEN},,g); send anything preceded
with 01 to UKGeographical
Am I missing something (e.g. Timeout(absolute) doesn't apply to
transferred calls) or can anyone spot something else that's allowing
the call to continue past the 59 minute set limit?
TIA,
--
Geoff
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Timeout(absolute) not working on transfer
Geoff,
I believe its actually TIMEOUT(absolute)=value. The function name is case
sensitive.
- Logan
On Dec 30, 2012 9:53 AM, Geoff Lane ge...@gjctech.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Asterisk 1.4.22.1 on CentOS 5
I've configured my dialplan to limit the maximum call length on
outgoing calls. I've done this as I get the first hour of each call
free with my bundle but I pay through the nose if the call goes over
an hour.
Family members who live overseas sometimes ask me to transfer them to
UK landline numbers, which is fine by me as it doesn't cost me
provided they don't exceed the hour limit. However, I noticed a few
days ago that a call from my son (who lives in Australia) that I
transferred didn't time out.
Relevant snippets of extensions.conf follow.
The incoming (via SIP) call fetches up at the following:
exten = [munged],1,Goto(main,1)
exten = main,1,Log(NOTICE, Prefilter: call from ${CALLERID(num)})
exten = main,n,PrivacyManager(2,10)
exten = main,n,GotoIf($[${PRIVACYMGRSTATUS} = FAILED]?withheld,1)
exten = main,n,Log(NOTICE, Incoming call from ${CALLERID(num)})
exten = main,n,GotoIf($[${BLACKLIST()}]?banned,1)
exten = main,n,Set(CALLERID(name)=${DB(cidname/${CALLERID(num)})})
exten = main,n,Dial(${rgMain},${RINGTIME},t)
exten = main,n,Log(NOTICE, Call from ${CALLERID(num)} sent to voicemail)
exten = main,n,VoiceMail(main@default)
To transfer the call, I press # then dial the number, which is in the
form of 01nnn nn, and so should fetch up at the following:
exten = _01.,1,SET(Timeout(absolute)=3540)
exten = _01.,n,Dial(${UKGeographical}/${EXTEN},,g); send anything
preceded with 01 to UKGeographical
Am I missing something (e.g. Timeout(absolute) doesn't apply to
transferred calls) or can anyone spot something else that's allowing
the call to continue past the 59 minute set limit?
TIA,
--
Geoff
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your lists to top posting being the norm? I am subscribed to several lists and bottom posting, proper trimming and commenting inline is the norm there. Actually the norm is determined by the list rules. If the list rules say one must use bottom posting then one should use bottom posting. If someone does not like that then don't subscribe, find another source to ask a question (the forum, LUG, hire a consultant) or just bottom post. Questions come before answers. Answers come after questions. -1 against changing rule #5. Regards, Patrick -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Sunday, December 30, 2012, 5:13:30 PM, Patrick wrote: On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your lists to top posting being the norm? I am subscribed to several lists and bottom posting, proper trimming and commenting inline is the norm there. Actually the norm is determined by the list rules. If the list rules say one must use bottom posting then one should use bottom posting. If someone does not like that then don't subscribe, find another source to ask a question (the forum, LUG, hire a consultant) or just bottom post. Questions come before answers. Answers come after questions. -1 against changing rule #5. Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation, no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless. but... -1 against changing rule #5. -- Best regards, Gergomailto:csi...@gmail.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Timeout(absolute) not working on transfer
On Sunday, December 30, 2012, Logan Bibby wrote: I believe its actually TIMEOUT(absolute)=value. The function name is case sensitive. Many thanks. I've changed my dialplan accordingly. -- Geoff -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes: Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation, no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless. There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and soon not see their posts at all. It is often a quick way to see if it is worth responding to someone. If they top post, nothing of value is likely to come out of the conversation. So by all means, everybody who wants to, keep top posting. /Benny -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Timeout(absolute) not working on transfer
No problem! Doubt check through a test extension. I don't want to be entirely wrong. ;) - Logan On Dec 30, 2012 12:12 PM, Geoff Lane ge...@gjctech.co.uk wrote: On Sunday, December 30, 2012, Logan Bibby wrote: I believe its actually TIMEOUT(absolute)=value. The function name is case sensitive. Many thanks. I've changed my dialplan accordingly. -- Geoff -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 12/30/2012 03:54 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote: Boy what an elitist attitude. I have been on this list far longer than most people - long before digium even existed and if you don't value what I have to say - well just don't read it. If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing list the way you want to see it well maybe its your opinions us top posters won't miss, since clearly you are lacking the skills to even have your tools format documents for you. Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes: Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation, no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless. There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and soon not see their posts at all. It is often a quick way to see if it is worth responding to someone. If they top post, nothing of value is likely to come out of the conversation. So by all means, everybody who wants to, keep top posting. /Benny -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Compile asterisk11.1 for i586 VIA C3 CPU
Hi, I've compiled asterisk 11.1 for my MiniITX card with VIA C3 Samuel2 800MHz CPU. A small box to play with PBX at home. I get this error when I start asterisk: root@pbx01:/usr/src/asterisk-11.1.0# /etc/init.d/asterisk start Illegal instruction Starting Asterisk PBX: asteriskIllegal instruction I compiled it on debian 6.0.6 with this options: ./configure --build=i386-pc-linux-gnu --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ --with-iksemel=/usr/src/iksemel-1.4 --with-pri=/usr/src/libpri-1.4.14 \ --with-dahdi='/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1' --libdir=/usr/lib I was able last days to compile asterisk 1.8 and it did work perfectly except with Gtalk, and this is why I have to compile v11.1 I have gone through these steps (v1.8): 1) ./configure --with-iksemel=/usr/src/iksemel-1.4 --with-pri=/usr/src/libpri-1.4.14 --with-dahdi='/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1' --libdir=/usr/lib 2) in Makefile change : PROC=i586 (instead of i686) 3) in makeopts change: #BUILD_PLATFORM=i686-pc-linux-gnu BUILD_PLATFORM=i586-pc-linux-gnu #BUILD_CPU=i686 BUILD_CPU=i586 #HOST_PLATFORM=i686-pc-linux-gnu HOST_PLATFORM=i586-pc-linux-gnu #HOST_CPU=i686 HOST_CPU=i586 PROC=i586 4) # make make install But I can't do the same changes for asterisk 11.1 because the makefiles haven't the same content as for asterisk v1.8 I need asterisk 11.1 to be able to receive and make calls to gtalk accounts Do you have any idea where is the problem ? My VIA CPU: root@pbx01:/usr/src/asterisk-11.1.0# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 7 model name : VIA Samuel 2 stepping: 3 cpu MHz : 799.892 cache size : 64 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 mtrr pge mmx 3dnow bogomips: 1599.78 clflush size: 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Compile asterisk11.1 for i586 VIA C3 CPU
Try this... In menuselect, uncheck BUILD_NATIVE under Compiler Flags and recompile. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:44 PM, neo haux neo.h...@gmx.com wrote: Hi, I've compiled asterisk 11.1 for my MiniITX card with VIA C3 Samuel2 800MHz CPU. A small box to play with PBX at home. I get this error when I start asterisk: root@pbx01:/usr/src/asterisk-11.1.0# /etc/init.d/asterisk start Illegal instruction Starting Asterisk PBX: asteriskIllegal instruction I compiled it on debian 6.0.6 with this options: ./configure --build=i386-pc-linux-gnu --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ --with-iksemel=/usr/src/iksemel-1.4 --with-pri=/usr/src/libpri-1.4.14 \ --with-dahdi='/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1' --libdir=/usr/lib I was able last days to compile asterisk 1.8 and it did work perfectly except with Gtalk, and this is why I have to compile v11.1 I have gone through these steps (v1.8): 1) ./configure --with-iksemel=/usr/src/iksemel-1.4 --with-pri=/usr/src/libpri-1.4.14 --with-dahdi='/usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1' --libdir=/usr/lib 2) in Makefile change : PROC=i586 (instead of i686) 3) in makeopts change: #BUILD_PLATFORM=i686-pc-linux-gnu BUILD_PLATFORM=i586-pc-linux-gnu #BUILD_CPU=i686 BUILD_CPU=i586 #HOST_PLATFORM=i686-pc-linux-gnu HOST_PLATFORM=i586-pc-linux-gnu #HOST_CPU=i686 HOST_CPU=i586 PROC=i586 4) # make make install But I can't do the same changes for asterisk 11.1 because the makefiles haven't the same content as for asterisk v1.8 I need asterisk 11.1 to be able to receive and make calls to gtalk accounts Do you have any idea where is the problem ? My VIA CPU: root@pbx01:/usr/src/asterisk-11.1.0# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 7 model name : VIA Samuel 2 stepping: 3 cpu MHz : 799.892 cache size : 64 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 mtrr pge mmx 3dnow bogomips: 1599.78 clflush size: 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, jon pounder wrote: If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing list the way you want to see it well maybe its your opinions us top posters won't miss, since clearly you are lacking the skills to even have your tools format documents for you. And let the flame wars begin! If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing list the way you want to see it well maybe its your opinions us BOTTOM posters won't miss, since clearly you are lacking the skills to even have your tools format documents for you or have the courtesy to follow the rules of the list. Just trim off all the crap except the point you are responding to and then I'm sure it's within your skill set to position your cursor down a couple of lines before typing. -- Thanks in advance, - Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 30/12/2012 11:13 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your lists to top posting being the norm? I am subscribed to several lists and bottom posting, proper trimming and commenting inline is the norm there. Actually the norm is determined by the list rules. If the list rules say one must use bottom posting then one should use bottom posting. If someone does not like that then don't subscribe, find another source to ask a question (the forum, LUG, hire a consultant) or just bottom post. Questions come before answers. Answers come after questions. -1 against changing rule #5. Regards, Patrick Not really enough time in the day to keep track of different rules for all the forums. I am more concerned about content than form. As long as the questions get answered, I can figure out where it is but it is a PITA to scroll down through an e-mail to find out that there is nothing there worth reading. I get over 100 e-mails per day that make it through my filters. I like to read the content as soon as it pops up rather than searching for the text. Ron -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 30/12/2012 3:54 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote: Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes: Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation, no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless. There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and soon not see their posts at all. It is often a quick way to see if it is worth responding to someone. If they top post, nothing of value is likely to come out of the conversation. So by all means, everybody who wants to, keep top posting. Questions by their nature are all top posted and bottom posted so if you know any answers, your participation will be encouraged. It is only long discussions that will miss your input. Ron /Benny -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I have an idea! Instead of arguing over whether or not top posting or bottom posting is the way to go, something that obviously no one will *ever*agree on, why not move to Google Groups instead (or something similar to Google Groups). When I post to Doubango's list, it's easy, there's no top or bottom posting wars, it just works. In fact, in a thread, Google Groups usually drops you right to the most recent message, so the people who like top posting can still see the most recent message while the bottom posters will still see the bottom posting format. It's either this, or we can sit and watch intelligent people continue to degrade one another and argue over something with no agreement in site. :) When I mentioned this before, someone from Digium said this will never happen, and it's unfortunate. Maybe they just like to see people bicker and argue. If there's a better alternative to Google Groups, or a way to set preferences in the mailing list so that everyone is happy, maybe that's something that could be done? James On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote: On 30/12/2012 11:13 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your lists to top posting being the norm? I am subscribed to several lists and bottom posting, proper trimming and commenting inline is the norm there. Actually the norm is determined by the list rules. If the list rules say one must use bottom posting then one should use bottom posting. If someone does not like that then don't subscribe, find another source to ask a question (the forum, LUG, hire a consultant) or just bottom post. Questions come before answers. Answers come after questions. -1 against changing rule #5. Regards, Patrick Not really enough time in the day to keep track of different rules for all the forums. I am more concerned about content than form. As long as the questions get answered, I can figure out where it is but it is a PITA to scroll down through an e-mail to find out that there is nothing there worth reading. I get over 100 e-mails per day that make it through my filters. I like to read the content as soon as it pops up rather than searching for the text. Ron -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- James Mortensen Project Manager, VoiceCurve, Inc. 866-707-4590 james.morten...@voicecurve.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Sorry for double posting, but I realized it was JIRA I spoke with Digium about, not Google Groups and the mailing list... However, I do think it's worth investigating or looking into alternatives that are more user friendly and that can make it easier to communicate with everyone on the list, whether a seasoned pro, top poster, or bottom poster. James On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:37 PM, James Mortensen james.morten...@voicecurve.com wrote: I have an idea! Instead of arguing over whether or not top posting or bottom posting is the way to go, something that obviously no one will * ever* agree on, why not move to Google Groups instead (or something similar to Google Groups). When I post to Doubango's list, it's easy, there's no top or bottom posting wars, it just works. In fact, in a thread, Google Groups usually drops you right to the most recent message, so the people who like top posting can still see the most recent message while the bottom posters will still see the bottom posting format. It's either this, or we can sit and watch intelligent people continue to degrade one another and argue over something with no agreement in site. :) When I mentioned this before, someone from Digium said this will never happen, and it's unfortunate. Maybe they just like to see people bicker and argue. If there's a better alternative to Google Groups, or a way to set preferences in the mailing list so that everyone is happy, maybe that's something that could be done? James -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Yeah. I never really got the whole fanatical top vs bottom thing. Whatever, I have answered way more than my fair share of free questions (as in beer). The person asking was always quite happy to get a meaningful and helpful reply, no matter where it was in the body of the content. Why people get worked up over small things is beyond me. Embrace the Chaos. Thanks, Steve T On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:42 PM, jon pounder j...@inline.net wrote: On 12/30/2012 03:54 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote: Boy what an elitist attitude. I have been on this list far longer than most people - long before digium even existed and if you don't value what I have to say - well just don't read it. If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing list the way you want to see it well maybe its your opinions us top posters won't miss, since clearly you are lacking the skills to even have your tools format documents for you. Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes: Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation, no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless. There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and soon not see their posts at all. It is often a quick way to see if it is worth responding to someone. If they top post, nothing of value is likely to come out of the conversation. So by all means, everybody who wants to, keep top posting. /Benny -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I just wish that my biggest problem with Asterisk was top or bottom posting! Ron On 30/12/2012 9:45 PM, James Mortensen wrote: Sorry for double posting, but I realized it was JIRA I spoke with Digium about, not Google Groups and the mailing list... However, I do think it's worth investigating or looking into alternatives that are more user friendly and that can make it easier to communicate with everyone on the list, whether a seasoned pro, top poster, or bottom poster. James On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:37 PM, James Mortensen james.morten...@voicecurve.com mailto:james.morten...@voicecurve.com wrote: I have an idea! Instead of arguing over whether or not top posting or bottom posting is the way to go, something that obviously no one will /ever/ agree on, why not move to Google Groups instead (or something similar to Google Groups). When I post to Doubango's list, it's easy, there's no top or bottom posting wars, it just works. In fact, in a thread, Google Groups usually drops you right to the most recent message, so the people who like top posting can still see the most recent message while the bottom posters will still see the bottom posting format. It's either this, or we can sit and watch intelligent people continue to degrade one another and argue over something with no agreement in site. :) When I mentioned this before, someone from Digium said this will never happen, and it's unfortunate. Maybe they just like to see people bicker and argue. If there's a better alternative to Google Groups, or a way to set preferences in the mailing list so that everyone is happy, maybe that's something that could be done? James ? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
There's nothing wrong with the list. The current whining will die off and things will be back to normal shortly. Meanwhile I was tempted to bin the entire thread then realized there's some funny human psychology to be laughed at. Top posting to make a few people crazy. Normally I wouldn't. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:37 PM, James Mortensen james.morten...@voicecurve.com wrote: I have an idea! Instead of arguing over whether or not top posting or bottom posting is the way to go, something that obviously no one will * ever* agree on, why not move to Google Groups instead (or something similar to Google Groups). When I post to Doubango's list, it's easy, there's no top or bottom posting wars, it just works. In fact, in a thread, Google Groups usually drops you right to the most recent message, so the people who like top posting can still see the most recent message while the bottom posters will still see the bottom posting format. It's either this, or we can sit and watch intelligent people continue to degrade one another and argue over something with no agreement in site. :) When I mentioned this before, someone from Digium said this will never happen, and it's unfortunate. Maybe they just like to see people bicker and argue. If there's a better alternative to Google Groups, or a way to set preferences in the mailing list so that everyone is happy, maybe that's something that could be done? James On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote: On 30/12/2012 11:13 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading. Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your lists to top posting being the norm? I am subscribed to several lists and bottom posting, proper trimming and commenting inline is the norm there. Actually the norm is determined by the list rules. If the list rules say one must use bottom posting then one should use bottom posting. If someone does not like that then don't subscribe, find another source to ask a question (the forum, LUG, hire a consultant) or just bottom post. Questions come before answers. Answers come after questions. -1 against changing rule #5. Regards, Patrick Not really enough time in the day to keep track of different rules for all the forums. I am more concerned about content than form. As long as the questions get answered, I can figure out where it is but it is a PITA to scroll down through an e-mail to find out that there is nothing there worth reading. I get over 100 e-mails per day that make it through my filters. I like to read the content as soon as it pops up rather than searching for the text. Ron -- __**__** _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 -- __**__**_ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- James Mortensen Project Manager, VoiceCurve, Inc. 866-707-4590 james.morten...@voicecurve.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Carlos Alvarez TelEvolve 602-889-3003 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Just my pitch in to post From a blackberry you can only top post there is no way of bottom posting So if I would have to wait to get to a computer to bottom post I would just never answer -Original Message- From: Carlos Alvarez car...@televolve.com Sender: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:58:20 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
