RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problem compiling asterisk-addons

2005-03-23 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Boehm Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:12 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem compiling asterisk-addons Eric wrote:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin

2005-03-31 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Don't. It is broken. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:26 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin How do I install the asterisk module for webmin?

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Altigen

2005-04-03 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Perik Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk - Altigen Has anyone successfully tied together an Altigen system to an Asterisk system using VoIP (ie. not using hardware (FXO/FXS cards, etc.))? My experience with the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Detecting Downed SIP Phone

2005-04-04 Thread Rusty Shackleford
John Goerzen Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:06 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Detecting Downed SIP Phone I recently encountered an odd situation: the network cable to my SPA-841 got unplugged while it was in the midst of a call. I got it re-plugged in about 30 seconds, and the phone

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Low cost box for hosting Asterisk and at least oneTDM400p

2005-04-11 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Chuck Bunn Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:38 AM To: Linux - PBX, Asterisk Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Low cost box for hosting Asterisk and at least oneTDM400p Can anyone recommend a very low cost box that could support Asterisk and at least one (preferably two) TDM400p cards and cost

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys PAP2 Dual Incoming Calls

2005-04-11 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:37 PM To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys PAP2 Dual Incoming Calls Hi List, Im facing a strange problem using

RE: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shane fowler Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:10 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk 600 analog connections. Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] High capacity voicemail

2005-02-24 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of izo Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:12 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] High capacity voicemail Hi, Does anybody has experience with high capacity PSTN

[Asterisk-Users] E100P to Valiant E1-PRI GSM gateway

2005-02-25 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Looking for zaptel/zapata configuration parameters to successfully communicate with a Valiant GSM gateway as above. Surely someone has done this? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 02/22/2005

RE: [Asterisk-Users] BroadVoice configuration changes for Outbound

2005-03-07 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Doing this with no notification whatsoever, let alone notification sufficiently in advance of these changes, was stupid and careless. This move probably broke a significant number of your customers' telephones service. One can only guess at the impact that this careless move had on your customer

RE: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users]Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-02-01 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alistair Cunningham Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:25 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users]Realtime

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk video conference

2006-02-02 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Title: Message -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shain LeeSent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:14 AMTo: AsteriskSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk video conference Hi , I just wanted to know , how would be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do we need a QOS switch ?

2006-02-05 Thread Rusty Shackleford
stoffell wrote: On 2/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have 10 people on our network and each person will have a SIP phone connected to our Asterisk server. All phones, Asterisk, other servers and users workstations will be using the same network. The question is: would I

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Solution for 1 time blast of 200, 000 recorded calls

2006-02-14 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Corlett Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:01 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Solution for 1 time blast of 200,000 recorded calls Ron Senykoff

RE: [Asterisk-Users] g729 quality at GSM bitrates

2006-02-20 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Bagnall Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:43 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users] g729 quality at GSM bitrates I'm trying to improve

RE: [Asterisk-Users] changing Nobody picked up in 30000 m

2005-07-08 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wassim darwish Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:15 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] changing Nobody picked up in 3 m i dont know how to edit the the time for

RE: [Asterisk-Users] URGENT: hardware spesifications needed

2005-07-08 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael L Smith Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 12:02 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] URGENT: hardware spesifications needed Who are

RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC gives me only the time, but no cost

2005-07-23 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Wiebe Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 8:08 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC gives me only the time, but no cost The

RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC gives me only the time, but no cost

2005-07-24 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Wiebe Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 3:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC gives me only the time, but no cost Thank you

RE: [Asterisk-Users] super high bandwidth codec

2005-07-24 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Title: Message -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 9:11 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] super high bandwidth codec It has nothing to do

RE: [Asterisk-Users] To anyone seeking 911 Service Providers stayaway!!!

2005-07-26 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julio Arruda Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:01 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] To anyone seeking 911 Service Providers stayaway!!!

RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC: different incriments

2005-07-26 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Wiplinger Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:03 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC: different incriments How can I fulfill that?

RE: [Asterisk-Users] To anyone seeking 911 Service Providersstayaway!!!

2005-07-26 Thread Rusty Shackleford
The mandatory part that is due right now is the section of the law that deals with informing the voip user of their current E911 status. That part is not in a comment phase. Actually, that part takes effect July 29. The access requirements will probably hit at the end of November. -- No

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Question about Nextone softswitch

2005-07-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:05 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Question about Nextone softswitch As an exampleif we have a call that:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Astcc Charging \ Matching Pattern Problem

2005-08-02 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Title: Message -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ade AgberoSent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:32 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Astcc Charging \ Matching Pattern

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limiting the number of calls

2005-08-10 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Miron Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 11:33 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Limiting the number of calls Hey everyone. I'm wondering if anyone has any

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Unbelievable...

2005-04-17 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Unbelieavable, and utterly disgraceful. Anyone found responsible for establishing such a policy would quickly find their ass on the street in any organization that understands the first thing about customer service. One doesn't build or protect a business by threatening and bullying one's

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Unbelievable...

2005-04-18 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Unbelievable... Having worked as a senior manager in a technical organization, a large number of tehcnical people

RE: [Asterisk-Users] VOIP Gateways Asterisk

2005-04-26 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Callum McGillivray Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 12:29 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] VOIP Gateways Asterisk We are planning to do an * install in an apartment

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:43 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729 My question is.. if my voip terminator

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:31 AM To: Adam Goryachev Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729 I'll gladly pay

RE: [Asterisk-Users] A good SIP receptionist phone

2005-04-30 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Welter Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A good SIP receptionist phone

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemailbox on Queue?

2005-05-04 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:44 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemailbox on Queue? Thanks, Paul for the info. What I'm

RE: [Asterisk-Users] broadvoice NCFA numbers

2005-05-11 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Dziubanski Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:56 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] broadvoice NCFA numbers Im about to drop their

RE: [Asterisk-Users] LOOKING TO HIRE

2005-05-21 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:10 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] LOOKING TO HIRE Or rather, let me take that back. If you do not

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Digium FXS modules too fragile?

2005-05-24 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Yes, one might think that, IF one didn't understand the nature of electricity and electrical components. SOME people also puzzle over the fact that you can't boil eggs on an electric guitar. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-25 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Krall Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:41 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID) It doesnt seem to

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Digium FXS modules too fragile?

2005-05-25 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson Pickett Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:03 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium FXS modules too fragile? SOME people also

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-25 Thread Rusty Shackleford
: CallerID)Rusty Shackleford wrote: And that's the real trick. Web browsers, unless they are instructed to do otherwise, don't DO anything once they've completed loading a page. So without instructing them to refresh, they aren't going to be aware of a server-side change, such as an incoming call

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-25 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel van Baak Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 12:04 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID) And that's the real trick. Web

RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

2005-05-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
Title: Message -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory AndrewsSent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:33 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com Karl,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie here. Tips on setting up 100 phones wanted.

2005-05-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brandt Milczewski Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 10:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie here. Tips on setting up 100 phones wanted.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 vs. gsm

2005-05-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:40 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 vs. gsm Well, it does to anyone without hearing

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Goryachev Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 7:00 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID) of client hardware.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Fanning Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:20 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID) Could you use

RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Fanning Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 12:39 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID) No installation as

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple E1s on one box

2005-06-08 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Alayon Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple E1s on one box Answering both questions:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] howto write CDRs on two mysql servers

2005-06-09 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Musone Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] howto write CDRs on two mysql servers why not just

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization

2005-06-09 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Pajari Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization We have a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Portable USB headset for VoIP

2005-06-14 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Mahler Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:04 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Portable USB headset for VoIP I've bought bunches of these:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC Rate Calculation

2005-06-18 Thread Rusty Shackleford
On Fri, June 17, 2005 5:19 pm, Darren Wiebe said: Good Day Has anybody here looked closely at the call cost calculation in ASTCC? Can you duplicate the way the cost of a call is calculated? I believe that there is an error in the code. I have fixed it, I think and submitted a patch but we

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC Rate Calculation

2005-06-18 Thread Rusty Shackleford
On Sat, June 18, 2005 2:34 pm, Darren Wiebe said: Okay, I'll post both pieces of code. What I was seeing is that calls where being billed more than I thought they should be. Lets use an example with the following info: Call Length: 147 Seconds Increments: 6 Seconds Connect Charge: 100

RE: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC Rate Calculation

2005-06-20 Thread Rusty Shackleford
eval { $cost = int($adjcost * $adjtime / 60) }; #cost = 253 Corrected, this would be 250. Viewed another way, using a 6 second increment, 147 seconds represents 25 such increments (actually 24.5, but we get all of the last increment, so it's 25). 25 * 10 (the cost of

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 12 FXO ports into Asterisk

2005-06-23 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Wright Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 12 FXO ports into Asterisk I have a client that has 10

RE: [Asterisk-Users] LiveVoip is Bankrupt

2005-06-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcel van Kaam, Fonetica Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:46 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] LiveVoip is Bankrupt Hi All, I think

RE: [Asterisk-Users] HooDaHek 0.2 Released

2005-06-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Pralle Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 2:50 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] HooDaHek 0.2 Released HooDaHek 0.2 Released Just a few

RE: [Asterisk-Users] VOIP Providers Problems

2005-07-04 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Smith Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 2:44 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] VOIP Providers Problems you guys are so friggin funny.. all i see bout problems

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Simpletelecom dead?

2005-07-05 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Ferrell Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:27 AM To: C F; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simpletelecom dead? I've gotten word from their

RE: [Asterisk-Users] URGENT: hardware spesifications needed

2005-07-07 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Frisch Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 4:22 PM To: Jimmy Smith; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] URGENT: hardware spesifications needed

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Notices

2005-08-26 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BJ Weschke Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Notices After that date passes, technically, you're

RE: [Asterisk-Users] prepaid application

2005-12-01 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scott Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:52 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] prepaid application Hi All I am using prepaid auth (callingcards), the idea is for

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Non-PRI T1

2006-01-06 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Phillips Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:39 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Non-PRI T1 Are they configured for inbound calls?

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Server Specification

2006-01-14 Thread Rusty Shackleford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Code Lover Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:39 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Server Specification Hello, Is the hardware specification is enough to