Hi,
We've got a dedicated T1 with two trunks running into our ILECs
selective router for 911. Split out of the T1 into two MF CAMA trunks
on ILEC side.
I'm trying to use asterisks e911 signaling, but I'm having trouble with
the dial command. (== Everyone is busy/congested at this time
Well, good news, it was the telco side. They had their ports disabled.
I ended up having to use signalling=fgccamamf.
Adam
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:43 AM
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Predictive Dialer
Adam Vocks wrote:
OK, so apparently no one is using GnuDialer, is anyone out there using
any other predictive dialers on asterisk
OK, so apparently no one is using
GnuDialer, is anyone out there using any other predictive dialers on asterisk?
Thank you,
Adam Vocks
From: Adam Vocks
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006
12:41 PM
To: 'Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject
- Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Predictive Dialer
Adam Vocks wrote:
OK, so apparently no one is using GnuDialer, is anyone out there using
any other predictive dialers on asterisk
Hello all,
I have a client interested in GnuDialer. My question
is: Is there anyone on this list who has been using GnuDialer and I was
wondering if you would be willing to share your experiences with it.
Thank You
Adam
___
I have used 911 with PRI with nothing else
configured. Telco had to make changes to their router for DID numbers to call
through.
Adam
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pukepail
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006
12:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006
5:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
Upgrade to 1.2
Hello all,
After upgrading to asterisk 1.2 or the current CVS HEAD, asterisk
doesnt receive
Hello all,
After upgrading to asterisk 1.2 or the current CVS HEAD, asterisk doesnt
receive all of the DID number that is calling in. I have a T100P and a freshly
installed version of Fedora.
zapata.conf and zaptel are default except for enableing em wink.
Any ideas? If I install
]: chan_zap.c:2301
zt_answer: Took Zap/15-1 off hook
Jan 2 17:57:53 DEBUG[3645]: channel.c:1128
ast_settimeout: Scheduling timer at 160 sample intervals
Playing
'CTI/CTIClosed' (language 'en')
Thanks for any help!
Adam
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Just call tech support for a large company. Your always on hold longer
than 10 minutes!
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Eicke
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:15 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
This is what we use.
Adam
exten = *450,1,AddQueueMember(CTITechnicalSupport)
exten = *450,2,PlayBack(agent-loginok)
exten = *450,3,Hangup
exten =
#450,1,RemoveQueueMember(CTITechnicalSupport)
exten =
#450,2,PlayBack(agent-loggedoff)
exten = #450,3,Hangup
From:
I would be interested in a simple call to a woman.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Goodyear
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:50 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] a
is a primitive sketch.
If anyone has information, please share.
Thank You
Adam Vocks
CTI
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
as an IAX
gateway. (highly vaporware at this point), The Acend unit support SIP, the
Cisco suport..., etc. etc,
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
11:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject
] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
10:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through
Were still using Lucent PM3s
Adam
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
* and the modem bank
if your modem bank support thats. The setup you're looking to put
together here doesn't appear to be much different than folks who have
hooked up an * device to an Avaya Definity or other PBX via a PRI tie
line.
On 6/1/05, Adam Vocks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an order to save
If extension 101 calls 102 and user 102 hits # and then 103,
the caller ID of 103s phone says 102. Ive been looking for a way
to have 103s Caller ID show the person that is being transferred not the
person transferring.
So if my receptionist answers the phone and transfers it to
one of
] CallerID when transferring calls.
On Saturday 28 May 2005 23:54, Adam Vocks wrote:
So if my receptionist answers the phone and transfers it to one of
my
techs, I want my techs phone to display the caller ID of the
person who
called the receptionist.
Does anyone have a solution
Installed the new version and, yep, thats
what I wanted!
Thanks asterisk developers.
Adam
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 6:12
PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE
We've been talking about
moving from our NBX100 to an asterisk solution for some time now.
Well, to make a long
story short, the call processor on our NBX has went south. We are now
forced to purchase a new call processor $500 or move our solution to asterisk.
(Which is up and running
Not sure about E1's but we are paying $1200 per month for a PRI. Get
this, for a PRI without Caller ID services its $950...
Free incoming calls and free local calling.
I think that is really high, but I don't think I have a whole lot of
choices here in central Illinois with Consolidated
22 matches
Mail list logo
