Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having problems with * not hanging up an incoming PSTN line, if that line is not answered before the person calling in hangs up. The line hangs in various states, it has hung with a busy tone, with no tone at all. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have a digium 4port line card. This was configured by the genzaptel command I then added trunks for each line. I think that genzaptel uses fxs_ks as the default for the fxo devices. This need to be changed to fxs_ls. Then it should work fine. I also have a Pulver WiSip phone which I need to be able to transfer calls on by dialing a prefix. Eg *2ext Any help on either problem would be greatly appreciated, I'm still learning my way around the whole * [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing. Stay with it. It's worth the effort. Mike Rick __ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Errors Compiling chan_capi 0.3.5
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:21, Armin Schindler wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 23:21, Armin Schindler wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: Yes libcapi is installed. Here is a sample of the errors I am getting: In file included from chan_capi.c:38: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword chan_capi_pvt.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union chan_capi_pvt.h:195: syntax error before '}' token chan_capi.c:41: syntax error before ast_capi_MessageNumber ... It looks like _cword is not defined. The definition is made in /usr/include/capiutils.h, do you have this file (should be installed by the libcapi/capi20 package) ? On what system do you compiling (SuSE, Debian, ... or even Cross) ? OK. I found I was missing isdn4k-utils-devel-3.1-76 and therefore capiutils.h etc. Now when I try to complie I get: chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') So things are still not quite right. The system is [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 (CentOS 3.4 final) Any other pointers? It seems the setting in the Makefile of chan_capi about using CVS_HEAD is not correct. I don't know which version [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 is using, but try to change that setting. Anyway, the CVS_HEAD/UNSTABLE_CVS defines in chan_capi is not really good. I changed that to have a small configure script, which makes the correct settings depending the Asterisk version it is compiled against. I will soon release my version of a reworked chan_capi. I have changed the setting but now get different errors: gcc -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i586 -DCAPI_ES -DCAPI_GAIN -DCAPI_SYNC -DCVS_HEAD -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-missing-declarations -DCRYPTO -c -o chan_capi.o chan_capi.c chan_capi.c:69: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:70: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:71: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:72: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:73: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:74: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:75: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer The version of Asterisk appears to be 1.0.7. When do you expect to have your reworked chan_capi ? Mike Armin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Errors Compiling chan_capi 0.3.5
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:27, Armin Schindler wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:21, Armin Schindler wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 23:21, Armin Schindler wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: Yes libcapi is installed. Here is a sample of the errors I am getting: In file included from chan_capi.c:38: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword chan_capi_pvt.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union chan_capi_pvt.h:195: syntax error before '}' token chan_capi.c:41: syntax error before ast_capi_MessageNumber ... It looks like _cword is not defined. The definition is made in /usr/include/capiutils.h, do you have this file (should be installed by the libcapi/capi20 package) ? On what system do you compiling (SuSE, Debian, ... or even Cross) ? OK. I found I was missing isdn4k-utils-devel-3.1-76 and therefore capiutils.h etc. Now when I try to complie I get: chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') So things are still not quite right. The system is [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 (CentOS 3.4 final) Any other pointers? It seems the setting in the Makefile of chan_capi about using CVS_HEAD is not correct. I don't know which version [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 is using, but try to change that setting. Anyway, the CVS_HEAD/UNSTABLE_CVS defines in chan_capi is not really good. I changed that to have a small configure script, which makes the correct settings depending the Asterisk version it is compiled against. I will soon release my version of a reworked chan_capi. I have changed the setting but now get different errors: gcc -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i586 -DCAPI_ES -DCAPI_GAIN -DCAPI_SYNC -DCVS_HEAD -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-missing-declarations -DCRYPTO -c -o chan_capi.o chan_capi.c chan_capi.c:69: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:70: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:71: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:72: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:73: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:74: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:75: `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' undeclared here (not in a function) chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer The version of Asterisk appears to be 1.0.7. Did you apply some patch to chan_capi? That's what I meant with the 'CVS_HEAD setting is not good', because some changes were made between some releases and the chan_capi Makefile just knows 'old' and 'new' which is not working for some versions. Anyway 1.0.7 should work with unpatched chan_capi 0.3.5. Thanks. I have now re-installed the unpatched chan_capi and have successfully compiled it. Now its on to try to get it to work. Thanks again When do you expect to have your reworked chan_capi ? I still want to fix some race-conditions. It should be ready for 'testing' end of this week. Let me know so I can give it a go. Mike Armin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Errors Compiling chan_capi 0.3.5
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 23:21, Armin Schindler wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: Yes libcapi is installed. Here is a sample of the errors I am getting: In file included from chan_capi.c:38: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword chan_capi_pvt.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union chan_capi_pvt.h:195: syntax error before '}' token chan_capi.c:41: syntax error before ast_capi_MessageNumber ... It looks like _cword is not defined. The definition is made in /usr/include/capiutils.h, do you have this file (should be installed by the libcapi/capi20 package) ? On what system do you compiling (SuSE, Debian, ... or even Cross) ? OK. I found I was missing isdn4k-utils-devel-3.1-76 and therefore capiutils.h etc. Now when I try to complie I get: chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') So things are still not quite right. The system is [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 (CentOS 3.4 final) Any other pointers? Mike Armin On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:57, Armin Schindler wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: I having difficulty in compiling chan_capi. I have installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0. This uses Asterisk v 1.0.7. I have downloaded chan_capi-0.3.5 and applied chan_capi-0.3.5-patch.diff. Despite all this I still get: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword. Plus many other errors. What errors do you get? Looks like the capi headers are missing. Do you have libcapi installed ? Armin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Errors Compiling chan_capi 0.3.5
I having difficulty in compiling chan_capi. I have installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0. This uses Asterisk v 1.0.7. I have downloaded chan_capi-0.3.5 and applied chan_capi-0.3.5-patch.diff. Despite all this I still get: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword. Plus many other errors. I believe I am in need of some HELP,,,please. Thanks Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Errors Compiling chan_capi 0.3.5
Yes libcapi is installed. Here is a sample of the errors I am getting: In file included from chan_capi.c:38: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword chan_capi_pvt.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union chan_capi_pvt.h:195: syntax error before '}' token chan_capi.c:41: syntax error before ast_capi_MessageNumber chan_capi.c:41: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ast_capi_MessageNumber' chan_capi.c:41: warning: data definition has no type or storage class chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete type chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:115: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:116: unknown field `description' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:116: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:116: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:117: unknown field `capabilities' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:117: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:117: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:118: unknown field `requester' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:118: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:118: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:120: unknown field `send_digit' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:120: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:120: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:121: unknown field `call' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:121: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:121: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:122: unknown field `hangup' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:122: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:122: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:123: unknown field `answer' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:123: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:123: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:124: unknown field `read' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:124: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:124: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') chan_capi.c:125: unknown field `write' specified in initializer chan_capi.c:125: warning: excess elements in struct initializer chan_capi.c:125: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') Does this help? Mike On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:57, Armin Schindler wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: I having difficulty in compiling chan_capi. I have installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] version 1.0. This uses Asterisk v 1.0.7. I have downloaded chan_capi-0.3.5 and applied chan_capi-0.3.5-patch.diff. Despite all this I still get: chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before _cword. Plus many other errors. What errors do you get? Looks like the capi headers are missing. Do you have libcapi installed ? Armin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Need help getting zap trunk to work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hove now released version 1.0. According to the changelog this is supposed to fix the ZAP problem. I am trying it myself today, for the same reason. I'll post my result. Mike On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 06:35, Listacc wrote: Hello All, I am currently using Asterisk @ Home 9.0 and I have the Digium Wildcard X100 / X100 I purchase off ebay, a old PIII and nic. I can get the trunk to show up in the flash operator panel thing or be active I dont know what it is but it doesn't show up once it is add and created and i even setup the out going plans etc. Regards, Otis Surratt Jr. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Need help getting zap trunk to work
Just to let you know, V 1.0 does fix the ZAP channel problem, although the trunk still does not show in FOP. Mike On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 07:57, Mike Price wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hove now released version 1.0. According to the changelog this is supposed to fix the ZAP problem. I am trying it myself today, for the same reason. I'll post my result. Mike On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 06:35, Listacc wrote: Hello All, I am currently using Asterisk @ Home 9.0 and I have the Digium Wildcard X100 / X100 I purchase off ebay, a old PIII and nic. I can get the trunk to show up in the flash operator panel thing or be active I dont know what it is but it doesn't show up once it is add and created and i even setup the out going plans etc. Regards, Otis Surratt Jr. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Zealand Telco (TelstraClear) query
I have the same setup but with 2 line and my calls disconnect OK. Here are my settings: zapata.conf group = 1 context=incoming signalling=fxs_ls echotraining=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes jitterbuffers=4 relaxdtmf=no immediate=no busydetect=yes busycount=8 callprogress=no musiconhold=default usecallerid=yes callerid=asreceived txgain=-5 rxgain=-12 channel = 2 indications.conf [general] country=nz [nz] description = New Zealand ringcadence = 400,200,400,2000 dial = 400 busy = 400/250,0/250 ring = 400+450/400,0/200,400+450/400,0/2000 congestion = 400/375,0/375 callwaiting = !400/200,!0/3000,!400/200,!0/3000,!400/200,!0/3000,!400/200 dialrecall = !400/100!0/100,!400/100,!0/100,!400/100,!0/100,400 record = 1400/425,0/15000 info = 400/750,0/100,400/750,0/100,400/750,0/100,400/750,0/400 Give these ago and see what happens. Or email offline Cheers On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:10, Chris Hodgetts wrote: Hello, I have an X100P installed at home, just one line.. Anyway, ring home, and it picks up, and does it's thing, and you leave a voice message or transfer to an extension or whatever ... When you hang up, the call remains... TelstraClear do the disconnect of the remote party different to Telecom, they don't appear to drop the line, they just put silence on the line, then 30 seconds or so later, give a very loud (much louder than any normal tone - to the point that if the phone were under a couch you could still hear it) tone but that continues forever, until you destroy the channel, or kill the asterisk process. I am wondering if anyone on the telstraclear network in Wellington has this set-up, and if they could help with what I might need to do . Thanks ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of
I also have a native bridge problem. I have 2 analogue phones each connected to an IAXy. When attempting a call between them I get the following: -- Accepting DIAL from nnn.nnn.117.75, formats = 0x4 -- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, IAX2/kitchen) in new stack -- Called kitchen -- Call accepted by 192.168.6.142 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/kitchen/8 is ringing -- IAX2/kitchen/8 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 -- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 and IAX2/kitchen/8 Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5353 socket_read: Ooh, voice format changed to 4 Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: chan_sip.c:771 __sip_autodestruct: Auto destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: db.c:163 ast_db_get: Unable to find key 'si-000fd3000a7e' in family 'iax/provisioning/cache' Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: iax2-provision.c:231 iax_provision_version: Unable to create provisioning packet for 'si-000fd3000a7e' Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5353 socket_read: Ooh, voice format changed to 4 Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5835 socket_read: Immediately destroying 8, having received INVAL Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: channel.c:2630 ast_channel_bridge: Returning from native bridge, channels: IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, IAX2/kitchen/8 Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2407 iax2_hangup: We're hanging up IAX2/kitchen/8 now... Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2416 iax2_hangup: Really destroying IAX2/kitchen/8 now... -- Hungup 'IAX2/kitchen/8' Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: app_dial.c:1036 dial_exec: Exiting with DIALSTATUS=ANSWER. == Spawn extension (local, 1133, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6' -- Executing Hangup(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (local, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6' Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2407 iax2_hangup: We're hanging up IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 now... -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6' Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5535 socket_read: Immediately destroying 12, having received hangup Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:3792 raw_hangup: Raw Hangup nnn.nnn.117.75:4569, src=11, dst=520 Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:3792 raw_hangup: Raw Hangup nnn.nnn.117.75:4569, src=12, dst=7260 Any ideas? Cheers Mike On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:00, Robert Goodyear wrote: On Apr 12, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Xu Wang wrote: i do have 'answer' to 1st incoming IAX before calling the 2nd IAX. Yes, the log looks almost the same. I have 1800 coming from one vendor, then call through 2nd vendor (it might be the same vendor as the 1st ) to the destination. If 'attempting native brige' is successful, both IAXs are hung up. But the call can still continue. Wait a moment... you mean the call is not dropped, but Asterisk is simply taken out of the media path? If so, I understand this to be the intended behavior unless you invoke the NOTRANSFER=YES directive in your IAX.conf for either channel. This I think is analogous to the CANREINVITE parameter for SIP. I hope someone else will correct me if my understanding is wrong. /rg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P with Analogue DDI Trunks
I have * configured with 2 X100P cards (fxs_ks). The lines from the telco are 'analogue both way ddi trunks'. This means that every inbound call contains digits that represent an extension on the PBX. I can make outbound calls from * with no problem however I cannot receive inbound calls on these trunks. Some investigation has shown that when the line is idle there is 50 volts present and zttool shows the X100P state as OK. When a call is presented the voltage drops to 0 and the X100P state changes to RED. I believe that at this point the telco is waiting to receive a ringing or busy tone. Has anyone managed to get this configuration working? Am I using the right interface FXO? Thoughts and ideas please. Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
