Re: [Asterisk-Users] T.38 fax summary

2005-02-28 Thread Pedro Miguel de Sousa Caria
Hi, my name is Pedro Caria I'm new to this list.
I live in Portugal and find myself in the position to talk often to 
various parts of the world, very often the Telco line has a delay 
superior to 1s, I also fax in the same conditions, so to my experience 
faxes do work with delays far superior to 75ms.

Am I missing something ?
Pedro Caria
On 27/fev/2005, at 17:10, Lee Howard wrote:
On 2005.02.27 08:34 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Hi,
I read it and found it very enlightening. I do have one question
regarding Modems don't like relativity. It says modems need a
constant delay; is there a limit to what it can handle. For example,
would it be possible to configure a jitterbuffer right at the endpoint
before the fax to put a constant delay of 1 second relative to the
sender. This should be enough time to weed out any jitter. Basically,
fix the jitterbuffer so the delay is constant. If a fax can handle a
constant delay of up to a second you're home.
Fax cannot handle a one-second delay.  As Steve mentions in the 
article, per-spec fax has some timings (particularly silence in 
direction switching) set at 75 ms +/- 20 ms.  So if the delay gets 
much larger than 75 ms, then there's likely to be trouble.  Now, some 
fax machines may tolerate larger delays, but that tolerance is beyond 
the spec, and thus should not be used as a gauge.

Lee.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Clarification on Fax capability?

2005-02-15 Thread Pedro Miguel de Sousa Caria
I've been trying this for a while and I have been unable to get a 
reliable connection betwen two Zaptel FXS interfaces, so the bridging 
does afect data transfer.

Anybody got some tunning tips to get this to work ?
I'm using a dual PIII with a ServerWorks Chipset, two TDM cards (8xFXS) 
and a Fritz Capi to connect to my telecom provider.

I can send faxes with some success, but receiving rate of success is 
less than 30%.

Fax information for Asterisk is difficult to come by is everybody using 
spandsp's way ?

Thx
Pedro Caria
On 15/fev/2005, at 15:05, Rich Adamson wrote:
On Tue, February 15, 2005 7:48 am, Rich Adamson said:
 2) simply switching a fax call through * to a tip/ring interface of
some sort that has an attached traditional fax machine.
Does the codec issue with #2 still apply if the incoming fax call is 
on a
Zaptel FXO interface?  Is the codec used when connecting two channels 
on
the same zaptel card or does the native bridg[ing] bypass that?
Funny that you should ask. I just finished testing it using the
faxdetect=incoming method, redirecting the call to a Cisco ata186.
The incoming call arrived on a TDM fxo port. Received the fax header,
but the remainder of the page was blank. The sender received a message
indicating a failure.
Best guess... the tdm driver problem is impacting the ability to send
the fax tones reliably even with g711. Its very likely to be the
interrupt latency and/or pci bus problem on this particular system.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users