Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 and chan_misdn

2007-03-27 Thread Pierre Burton

Hi,

you also need mISDNuser.

After that make clean  make install you'll have access to chan_misdn.

Regards.

Pierre

Administrator TOOTAI wrote:

Hi list,

I installed a fresh Debian/Etch with Asterisk 1.4 and Zaptel 1.4 from 
SVN for 2 Digium B410P card. I ran configure in Asterisk dir, went in 
zaptel dir and: make, make install, make b410p. Everything is ok. Now I 
want to compile Asterisk but can't activate the chan_misdn channel which 
depends on -from menuselect- isdnnet(E), misdn(E), suppserv(E)


When I made the make b410p, all the misdn stuff was downloaded from 
digium's ftp. Also, running /etc/init.d/misdn-init --scan show me the 2 
cards I have, /etc/init.d/misdn-init --config prepare me the misdn.conf 
and after a /etc/init.d/misdn-init start I see:


mISDN_dsp 191656  0
mISDN_capi 88716  0
mISDN_l2   34452  0
mISDN_l1   11036  0
mISDN_core 71360  6 
mISDN_dsp,hfcmulti,mISDN_capi,l3udss1,mISDN_l2,mISDN_l1

kernelcapi 44576  2 mISDN_capi,capi

My questions: why Asterisk doesn't want to let me activate the misdn 
channel? Is misdn ready for 1.4?


Thanks for any hint


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IAX2 trunking problems

2006-07-26 Thread Pierre Burton
verify property of dev/zap; if your asterisk running in non-root mode; 
change /dev/zap chown into asterisk non-root user.


Regards.

Jon Schøpzinsky wrote:

Hello list

We are having some strange problems.

When we setup trunking between two of our servers, the connection only uses 
trunking one way. Ex:

Data From callingserver to receivingserver uses trunking Data from 
receivingserver to callingserver does not use trunking.

I discovered this problem by looking at a tcpdump in Ethereal, and I can see 
that the trunked meta packets only goes one way. The other way uses normal Mini 
packets with raw a-law data.

Heres the configurations, with password, username and server info removed.

Callingserver:
[gsmgw1]
secret=***
username=**
host=***
type=peer
trunk=yes
notransfer=yes
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=g726

Receivingserver:
[**]
secret=***
context=default
host=**
type=user
accountcode=
trunk=yes
notransfer=yes

Both servers have ztdummy module installed and loaded.

Regards
Jon Schøpzinsky

  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp fax

2005-12-29 Thread Pierre Burton

Make it manually, because there is somme diff from 1.0.9

edit Makefile and add :

everything after +

Pierre

Carlos Alperin wrote:


Ok,

 


Everything was fine up to the moment to run patch  apps_makefile.patch

 


Then I got Hunk 1 of 2, on the line 98 of the Makefile.

 

This is the Makefile.rej output. As you can see, the line 98 includes 
some + signs that are in the apps_makefile.patch.


 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] apps]# cat Makefile.rej

** 94,103 

rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(MODULES_DIR)/app_qcall.so

 


  app_curl.so: app_curl.o

$(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ $(CURLLIBS)

 


  app_sql_postgres.o: app_sql_postgres.c

$(CC) -pipe -I/usr/local/pgsql/include $(CFLAGS) -c -o 
app_sql_postgres.


o app_sql_postgres.c

 


  app_sql_postgres.so: app_sql_postgres.o

$(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -L/usr/local/pgsql/lib -lpq

--- 98,113 

rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(MODULES_DIR)/app_qcall.so

 


  app_curl.so: app_curl.o

$(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ $(CURLLIBS)

 


+ app_rxfax.so : app_rxfax.o

+   $(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -lspandsp -ltiff

+

+ app_txfax.so : app_txfax.o

+   $(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -lspandsp -ltiff

+

  app_sql_postgres.o: app_sql_postgres.c

$(CC) -pipe -I/usr/local/pgsql/include $(CFLAGS) -c -o 
app_sql_postgres.


o app_sql_postgres.c

 


  app_sql_postgres.so: app_sql_postgres.o

$(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -L/usr/local/pgsql/lib -lpq

 

 


However there is no request to take those lines of that file.

 


Carlos Alperin

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rehan 
Ahmed

*Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:43 PM
*To:* Dov Bigio; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp  fax

 


Which version of Asterisk are you using ?

 


1.2 had problems in Make file for me 1.0.9 worked with a charm.

 


You can email me with the error you have, maybe I can help you

 


Rehan

 

On 12/28/05, *Dov Bigio* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am using Red Hat 9, but I don't think this changes the procedure

- Original Message -
From: Carlos Alperin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Dov Bigio' [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
'Asterisk Users Mailing
List -Non-Commercial Discussion' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:24 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp  fax



Don,

The previous question I believe was what linux are you using?

By the way, I would like to know that too, just I was trying to make this
work for weeks with no success.

Thanks,

Carlos Alperin


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dov Bigio

Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 10:54 AM
To: Kristof Hardy; Asterisk Users Mailing List - 

Non-CommercialDiscussion

Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp  fax

Hi BJ, Kristof,

It worked!

I am using the version at


http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.2pre21c/asterisk-1.

2.x/.

I think I had bad symlinks on /usr/local/lib and by reading the tutorial

on
AsteriskGuru I found that... (The previously installed version of 

spandsp

has been 0.0.3, but now you have installed version 0.0.2. The problem is
that the installation of version 0.0.3 creates a symlink, which is not
replaced by installation of version 0.0.2. So the symlink points to the
library of version 0.0.3, which actually does not exist.). I simply

deleted

all files related to spandsp from this directory and installed it again!

Thank you
Dov


- Original Message -
From: Kristof Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dov Bigio  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 

Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-CommercialDiscussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 

mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp  fax


 Dov Bigio wrote:
  I am using Asterisk 1.2.1 and followed instructions on
  http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/spandsp.html to install faxing
  capability on my server.

 what platform are you running on? (wich distro?)
 Does the make of the app_txfax and app_rxfax work out well?






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com 

http://Easynews.com --


Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users







___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com 
http://Easynews.com --


Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: