Danny Nicholas wrote:
You could change your asterisk command to asterisk -vvg, but this will eat
your disk space if you have a large number of faults since each core.* file
produced takes up 1-13 Mb.
In the day and age where 500GB hard drives are $75 at Micro Center, hard
drive space
Danny Nicholas wrote:
You would think this, but I've seen asterisk create 100 or more dumps in an
hour of 10+Mb. Depending on Inode size, etc., this situation could push a
system into a hurting capacity rather quickly. Also, many shops use older
technology and compound this by RAID striping,
vinicius.ne...@live.com wrote:
Heya, how are you doing recently ?
Hey you crazy cat, recently doing I know.
I would like to introduce you a very good company which I knew.
What happened them? Did Obama send them up the bomb or is there a snuke
in Hillary?
David fire wrote:
hi
what i should use? ael or conf???
I think it's personal choice at this point, I recently switched
everything to ael, it's easier to read and follow the flow and less
typing of redundant stuff. I have found that ael finds more of my fat
finger mistakes when it compiles in
Drew Gibson wrote:
David fire wrote:
you are soamming my mail box whit this useless discution
the solution is doble posting (top and bottom)
Is it the spelling that is difficult or the typing?
speel cheeK 2 heard. C?
Kind of reminds me of that movie... Johnny Dangerously -- You
Stephen Brown Jr wrote:
rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz
BIOS settings? I've seen some rtc issues with a Red Hat derivative
where the motherboard was bad, others I've seen BIOS settings affect the
real time clocks.
I think I had a board once where I had to specify ACPI=no to the kernel,
Paul Hales wrote:
In the order in which people normally read text they don't
repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time
a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad!
I am strongly against anyone posting anything with their bottom.
How about
RE Kushner List Account wrote:
Paul Hales wrote:
In the order in which people normally read text they don't
repeat the entire conversation from the beginning each time
a question is asked either... Bottom posting is just as bad!
I am strongly against anyone posting
Gondar Monn wrote:
That's what happens when illegal aliens, er, Undocumented Americans, do
all your contracting work.
Could it be that all fires that ever happened in the US were caused by
those guys ? ..
I guess 1+1=5 then .
No, but being Houston, they must have far more
Shaun Ruffell wrote:
Hopefully you are now using DAHDI so I'll just comment about DAHDI loads the
drivers.
Must be nice, every time I have tried to load DAHDI it kernel panics.
Don't try it if you have a card that uses tor2.
This is now the second time in what, less than a year, that
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky:
http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/
That's what
Doug wrote:
Why the BitTorrent guys want to give themselves
even a worse reputation is beyond me. We tell
our customers that they are not allowed to
download copyrighted material. But for other,
legal BitTorrent transfers, we suggest that
they use the scheduling feature of uTorrent to
Alex Balashov wrote:
RE Kushner List Account wrote:
Doug wrote:
Why the BitTorrent guys want to give themselves
even a worse reputation is beyond me. We tell
our customers that they are not allowed to
download copyrighted material. But for other,
legal BitTorrent transfers, we
Igor Widlinski wrote:
Awesome, I always wanted to see this law in real life.
Technically I didn't call him THAT guy. I was thinking of that recently
elected Chicago street thug who speaks before large crowds at night.
Just spend ten seconds on YouTube and you'll see it's not my original
Yehavi Bourvine wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replies so far!
We have Nortel PBX'es with a support contract from one of the local
VARs (Nortel does not give direct support here). In the last two weeks
we had one of our exchanges down for three half days; one was after a
failure, and
Noah Miller wrote:
and is only one of the roads that
leads to Hell (I prefer Patterson Lake Road myself since I drive in from
the North East).
Hmm. You must live near Ann Arbor.
No, northern suburbs of Detroit. M-59 to US-23 S to M-36 W..To S.
Howell St..Patterson Lake Rd..To
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Asterisk has experimental support for TLS and I know SDES/SRTP is on the
roadmap.
According to the chatter and heated discussions on asterisk-dev, I'd say
TCP/TLS is fairly untested and potentially very broken and will remain
that way through at least 1.6.1.
Al Baker wrote:
I know that everyone has gaps in their knowledge, but I am just
staggered that
systems are being sold/deployed with such fundamental TELCO workings not
being
understood. Frightening.
Yep, unbelievable.
This is the reason most PBXs are ground start, is there Zap
Tim Nelson wrote:
http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel?view=revrevision=4121
Pure VoIP is the wave of the future!
Yeah, April fools...
-Ron
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:01 PM, RE Kushner List Account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Al Baker wrote:
Quote
This code is pre-Asterisk 1.0... It processes quite a few calls daily, I
have about 1,800 DID numbers pointed at it,
Are you SURE on that figure
Al Baker wrote:
Quote
This code is pre-Asterisk 1.0... It processes quite a few calls daily, I
have about 1,800 DID numbers pointed at it,
Are you SURE on that figure. Since you cold have at MOST 4 T1's coming into
that box, 1,800 DIDs pointing to it sems like
one hell of a congestion
Drew Gibson wrote:
The box has been up since we upgraded the UPS, time before was for the
disk failure in Feb 2007.
Asterisk has now been up for 5 hours, 44 minutes (yes, by Murphy's Law,
I'm troubleshooting a problem butrestart when convenient does not
impact real uptime) but yesterday
Atis Lezdins wrote:
On 3/18/08, Pete Kay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ztdummy is required by meetme application. If you have no intention to
use it, you might very well remove.
I've seen this problem once, however recompiling everything and
restarting helped me. I would suggest you just doing
I have a Pentium 4 2.4ghz CPU with a T400P on CentOS 5.1 and I can't get
Zaptel 1.4.9 to run. When I compile and then start zaptel start I get a
kernel panic as well.
Zaptel 1.4.7 compiles and runs just fine. Under 1.4.9 tor2 loads and
wastes the system. I too have no resources to capture the
Bill Hackensack wrote:
I realize my messages may seem rude and obnoxious, but let's face it,
I'm just saying what the rest of you are thinking. I learned by
reading, reading, and reading.
sarcasm
Nobody wants to search, nobody wants to read - HOW DARE YOU!
Only geeks and nerds read, the
Carlos Alperin wrote:
I live in Southfield, our main office is in Pontiac, but our Colo is in
Southfield.
I'm here in Sterling Heights, have a call center in Clinton Twp that's
100% Cisco/Linksys phones (7940s and SPA942s) and rent in a colo down in
Southfield as well where I connect to
26 matches
Mail list logo
