Try to set PROC to arm.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Doug dsc3...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was successful in compiling asterisk in raspbien except for the
following error If I enable the gsm codec. It appears there is something in
the Makefile n this directory that needs to be changed. Probably
instruction `pushl %esi'
Doug Crompton
WA3DSP
http://www.crompton.com
On Monday, March 3, 2014 3:18 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Try to set PROC to arm.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Doug dsc3...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was successful in compiling
Sorry to insist. Maybe I should submit this as a bug?
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a test system with Ast 11.7 and DAHDI 2.9.0. I loaded a TE205P
card. Then I enter asterisk console, and once I do
fine. Too bad it's OOW by now :)
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:34:02PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Sorry to insist. Maybe I should submit this as a bug?
Thanks.
As the owner of a TE205P, it might
Hi,
I'm running a test system with Ast 11.7 and DAHDI 2.9.0. I loaded a TE205P
card. Then I enter asterisk console, and once I do a pri show channels,
the console no longer works correctly. There's no output for any command
after that. If I type pri show and hit tab for completion, console
Hello,
Getting this error on dahdi_cfg. Reverting to 2.8 the error goes away:
*line 15: Unable to create 'dahdi_cfg' mutex.*
Is this a problem?
Thanks in advance.
Full detail:
[ebox] dahdi_cfg -vvv
DAHDI Tools Version - 2.9.0.1
DAHDI Version: 2.9.0
Echo Canceller(s): HWEC
Configuration
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom distro, based on debian and currently built around
kernel 2.6.35.8. Is sem_open introduced only in DAHDI 2.9 ?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:21:24PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
Maybe the problem is lack of tmpfs?
statfs(/dev/shm, 0xbff88568) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
Is this a new requirement for DAHDI?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Shaun,
This system is a custom
Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough.
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Maybe the problem
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I created /dev/shm and mounted tmpfs on it, and the problem is no
more. Just creating /dev/shm was not enough
Ok thanks Shaun!
Best regards.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:12:41PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Just one last question: do you have another suggestion about this?
thanks.
Not really. There are other ways
Hello Russ,
Actually this was with pattest and patgen, not patlooptest. I don't know if
I can use patlooptest with B410P, should I?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Russ Meyerriecks
rmeyerrie...@digium.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
Hello,
I'm not sure if my previous e-mail went through, it contained a link so it
may have been blocked, Apologies if this is a duplicate.
I have a card here at the office that I'm trying to validate with some
tests. For now I've followed the instructions available in the KB
There's also SIPTAPI: http://www.ipcom.at/en/telephony/siptapi/
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:13 PM, bilal ghayyad bilmar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello;
Is there a method way to be able to dial the phone number through
asterisk from the outlook email contact?
Regards
Bilal
--
Hello,
I have a card here at the office that I'm trying to validate with some
tests. For now I've followed the instructions available here:
http://kb.digium.com/articles/Configuration/Back-to-Back-Pattern-Test-for-BRI-Adapters
.
I get this kind of output:
[..]
(.Error 44119): Unexpected
, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:00:19AM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Ok, I'm a believer now:
shell chrt -f 99 patlooptest /dev/dahdi/1 -t 300 -v
Using Timeout of 300 Seconds
Going for it...
Timeout achieved
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:18:55PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Still no luck:
shell pgrep asterisk
shell ps -ef | grep asterisk
shell lsof /dev/dahdi/channel
shell lsof /dev/dahdi/1
shell lsof /dev
defaultzone=us
span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs
clear=1-24
span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs
clear=25-48
How could I configure now so I can get conclusive readings for span2?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:02:10PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:29:44PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Shaun, sorry to insist on this, but this kind of diagnostic is new for me
and extremely valuable for my support operations.
You say when configured this way.. do you mean regarding dahdi? Here's
my
system
Hi there,
Running patlooptest following instructions on Digium KB, using dahdi 2.5.1
with a TE205P. I'm getting this kind of output (not full output). Note, I'm
using a standard cat5 ethernet cable (30cm), with a Digium T10i crossover.
Error 4985 (loop 19898, offset 425, error 214): Unexpected
, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
rodrigoborgespere...@gmail.com wrote:
Cause for concern?
For patlooptest ensure that:
- Your ethernet cable is straight through and not crossover
- The span you're testing is set to provide timing, not recover
- In dahdi_tools you can make
.
Right now both ports are in loop mode, no cable attached.
Maybe you guys @ Digium have seen this before as a symptom of card
malfunction?
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Russ Meyerriecks
rmeyerrie...@digium.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira
patlooptest /dev/dahdi/2 -t 300 -v
/dev/dahdi/2: Device or resource busy
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:58:57PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Running patlooptest following instructions on Digium KB, using
here's a checklist...
First, RTP port range not port forwarded correctly on the NAT router (check
rtp.conf).
Then, on sip.conf:
externip not correctly setup (it should be the public IP of the NAT
router)?
nat setting not enabled for any outbound trunk and the extensions (nat=yes)
?
localnet
Hi,
I'd like to know from other people's experience using Asterisk and Digium
cards like the TDM410P and B410P on Atom system (.e. giwth D525 CPU) and
Jetway motherboards. Any operational instability, unexpected freezes, etc
or in your experience it's a stable combination?
Thanks in advance for
Have seen mostly a lot of hq/branch implementations using IPSEC over
standard Internet connections.. that's what seems most cost effective for
most smb's, imo, with the inherent trade-offs. Other than that, I'd say
private IP VPN's based on HDSL E1's.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, er ic
Hello,
Can someone confirm to me if Asterisk 1.4 can be used with DAHDI 2.7 ?
Thanks in advance.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory
Thanks Shaun. Will give it a go.
Regards,
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:02:13PM +, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
Hello,
Can someone confirm to me if Asterisk 1.4 can be used with DAHDI 2.7 ?
Thanks in advance
28 matches
Mail list logo
