Re: [asterisk-users] Investigating international calls fraud

2015-01-29 Thread Stelios Koroneos
The 25000$ @6.25/min means 4000 minutes of calls (or 66H) 
Not sure in how many days this has accumulated but i seriously dought this is 
made from a human accessing the phone.
The fact that you get the calls at certain times might have to do with the 
timezone the calls are going

If you phone has an API (most have) and allows for calls to be made, or the web 
interface allows calls to be placed from there, and there is no password or the 
default credentials then this is how the calls are made.
Check the call velocity (number of calls per minute) from that phone and if you 
see multiple calls at the same time frame then its probably not a (single) 
human doing it but some dialler.

We start seen this way more often than before. i.e using the phone as an attack 
surface instead of breaking into to pbx.
Also there seem to be a lot of javascript cross-site” scripting attacks on the 
loose that target voip networks from the inside.
I.e using the browser to execute attacks from inside of a secure/firewalled 
network.
 



Stelios Koroneos

Jabber : stel...@soldecom.com




 On Jan 29, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Steven McCann steven.r.mcc...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hmm the calls are made during the day (and sometimes very early in the 
 morning). Right now it looks like someone actually made these calls. If that 
 is the case it's somewhat comforting to know the system wasn't compromised. 
 However, the $25,000 phone bill still remains. Yikes. $6.25 per minute to 
 Cambodia seems quite steep to me.
 
 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Duncan Turnbull dun...@e-simple.co.nz 
 wrote:
 On 29 Jan 2015, at 11:07, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
 
 Le 28/01/2015 22:03, Steven McCann a écrit :
 Hello,
 
 Hi
 
 
 I'm investigating a situation where there was a hundreds of minutes of
 calls from an internal SIP extension to an 855 number in Cambodia,
 resulting in a crazy ($25,000+) bill from the phone company. I'm
 investigating, but can anyone provide some feedback on what's happened
 here? I'm investigating how this happened as well as what types of
 arrangements can be made with the phone company (CenturyLink in Texas).
 
 Are you sure the calls weren't actually made internally? Can you see anything 
 to suggest the ip or mac address of the phone changed? Because for someone to 
 take advantage of the calls (assuming they don't get cash out of ringing 
 Cambodia) they needed to proxy through to that phone line, which maybe 
 required them leaving some sort of device on the network. Otherwise I am 
 guessing they got onto your PBX somehow.
 
 As suggested logs are important, including DHCP, syslog to see if anything 
 unusual happened.
 
 Did the calls run all day or just at night when no one was around?
 Was there more than one call up at a time? (how many calls does the Mitel 
 phone support?)
 How long were the calls? Were they varying lengths (more human like) and did 
 they just redial as soon as they were dropped? Or were they automated to 
 trigger as much cost as possible e.g. if the 1st minute is the most expensive 
 then you get a lot of short calls.
 
 Good luck
 
 
 
 
 Some details:
 * PBX is located in Texas
 * Phone carrier is CenturyLink
 * FreePBX distro running asterisk 1.8.14
 * source SIP extension is Mitel 5212, firmware 08.00.00.04, default
 admin password (argh!). Phone is used by many different people.
 
 More PBX setting details:
 * inbound SIP traffic is not allowed through the firewall
 * internal network is not accessed by many
 * FreePBX web interface
 
 *Questions I have at this moment:*
 1) how were the calls placed? Was the Mitel SIP phone hacked somehow?
 Asterisk PBX?
 
 Check your logs. In the full log with verbosity 3 you can follow how calls 
 were treated. Also the CDR should give you informations like the extension(s) 
 who placed those calls
 
 [...]
 
 -- 
 Daniel
 
 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com

[asterisk-users] Broadsoft - Asterisk interop

2014-02-27 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings to all.
I am not sure of this is a user question or a business so apologies
in advance if it should be asked in the business list.

A client of mine has a UK branch that is served by a provider that uses
the Broadsoft solution.
I want to create a sip trunk from a remote asterisk pbx to the client.

The provider claims that Broadsoft has a strict protocol on what
devices can connect on their network and asterisk is not listed 

Does anyone know if asterisk (1.8 to be more precise) has passed
interoperability tests with Broadsoft ?

There seems to be an old (circa 2008) agreement with Broadsoft and
Digium for partnership but neither Digium or asterisk are mentioned in
the Broadsoft partners page 
http://www.broadsoft.com/news/2008/digium-and-broadsoft-strengthen-partnership/

I see a device listed in the Partners page of Broadsoft (PIKA's WARP
Plus) that as far as i know is using asterisk inside
http://www.pikatechnologies.com/english/view.asp?x=1312

Anyone has any info or experience they would like to share with this ?

Stelios


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Tired of dropouts and garbled phone calls - where to go next?

2013-10-29 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 14:29 -0400, Eddie Mikell wrote:
 All,
 
 
 The users in our organization are well, quite frankly, sick of phone
 service that is being provided.  The choppy phone calls, and drop outs
 are detrimental to our sales force.
 
 
 I've tried about everything I can think of.  
 
 
 Moved the asterisk server from VM machine to dedicated machine
 More than enough bandwidth
 Setting 802.1p = 7
 Set Dedicated voice traffic 35% of bandwidth.
 
 
 Not sure what option would be the best
 
 
 Put analog lines in the conference room to avoid the dropouts
 - leave the sip lines in place for day to day use
 Hire a consultant
 Ditch the system and buy a pre-packaged system - RingCentral
 or some such.
 
 
 There are no local asterisk professionals who can help, and we are a
 little leery of opening up our system to outside consultants.
 
 
 Anyone else face the above, and finally abandoned Asterisk for a
 commercial system?  
 
 
 We have 167 users.
 I use Grandstream GXP 2100 on the desktop and Polycom ip6000 for the
 conference rooms.
 
 
 Suggestions welcome.
 
 
A general rule of thump after several years with voip

Voip turns out to be the canary in the coal-mine of a network. The
smallest change or problem will manifest itself as a voip issue no
matter what.


Now to some practical advice

Voip was designed for LAN's, The moment voip packets leave your lan and
go into a WAN of any sort, it could be the source of frustration for
many reasons.

1) Lots of routers/modems are not build to handle intense voip traffic.
voip generates lots of small in size UPD packages. In most of the cases
the routers/modems bridging your lan with the wan have no problem
handling them BUT what i have found is that once you get over a
threshold of traffic its possible the routers/modem can not cope with
it, mainly because the large number of packets they have to process.
In most enterprise grade routers the specs give you 2 numbers for the
size of data the router can handle.
total throughput and pps (packets per second). 
Usually total throughput is calculated using a packet size of around
1500bytes and it takes the router the same resources to process a 1500
bytes package as it does a 90bytes packet of a g729 call, as it just
looks at the headers and not the payload.So yes your router can handle
60Mbits (of 1500byte frames) which is about 5000 packers per second but
for voip that translates to less than 4Mbits of data (5000 packets of 90
bytes) 
I think you can get the picture


2) Because of 1) its possible that your ISP has issues, especially if
its handling lots of voip traffic while its equipment is not optimized
for that.

 
3) QOS and queing in general
Whatever you do with QOS to get a better priority/quality, the dirty
secret is, you can only control what YOU send, not what you receive.
And even that is true till your modem/router. Once the packet is gone
you have no control of how it will be handle by all intermediates till
it reaches its destination.
You have no idea if qos is honored by ALL hops and what kind of queuing
they apply (if they do) to that port/service/qos mark
That beeing said, its possible that you *might* have much better luck
with sip and sip rtp than with iax rtp  if your isp and all its
interconnects bother to offer qos for rtp.
Now for receiving it can be even harder if your isp does not provide
correct priority queuing for the rtp stream, as latencies can build fast
especially on busy hours (which happen to be the same hours people use
their phones the most...) where people download stuff,emails etc.

ping.icmp and all the other networking monitoring tools/protocols could
be an indicator BUT its most probable that they will be handled by the
isp and its interconnects at the higher qos priority
The only way to see how rtp traffic is handled is to run rtp traffic.  

The only way around this is a dedicated circut MPLS or similar between
the points of interest (i.e offices), with specific SLA which usually
means much much higher costs.
 
 
Finally my 2 cents for troubleshouting.
Check the network first !
Find what triggers the problem. 
Is it something that happens all time regardless of traffic ?
is it periodic ? (when bw goes over X percent, or at a specific time of
day ?)
Try different qos settings/priority queuing  on the router
 

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Phone 
US : (+1) 347-783-5467
Greece : (+30) 211-800-7655 ext 101

Skype : skoroneos

PGP Key fingerprint = DC66 109A 6C3A 2D65 BA52  806E 6122 DAF4 32E7 076A



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or 

Re: [asterisk-users] Performance Asterisk large installation on Vmware/Xen

2013-05-18 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 15:01 -0300, Rafael dos Santos Saraiva wrote:
 Hi
 
 
 I would like the opinion of you and if anyone has a similar scenario.
 I have a project for installation of a Asterisk server in a client
 with about 400 extensions. My question is whether this scenario carry
 an Asterisk virtualized. Will be used only extensions and trunks sip
 sip, 1 queue with 2 agents, without call recording. It is best to use
 XEN or VMware? Which best version of Asterisk for this scenario?
 
 
If there is no transcoding it could work assuming that this is not a
call center where all extensions would pretty much be up and running
all the time.
i.e this is a setup for a large office installation.
Assuming a recent XEON cpu and adequate RAM, main stumbling block is
usually network performance so you need a machine with good ethernet
chipset and linux driver.
Also you will need to twick the dahdi timing source or strange things
could start happening 
I've used KVM and XEN but presonaly i feel much more comfortable with
KVM
As for asterisk version i would recommend 1.8 which is LTS at this
point.

Stelios




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] cdr report

2013-04-23 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:35 +0300, aristidis tsitras wrote:
 Hi. i am running asterisk in a low powered machine (alix2d13 from 
 pcengines) without any gui. the machine works fine to route all my calls 
 for the office. the problem is the management of the CDRs. i can see the 
 master.csv file, but it is not very friendly for the secretary of this 
 office to manage the calls.
 is there a way to have a nice way to see the CDRs?Since the machine is 
 very small on CPU, it has to be as low on CPU/RAM consumption as possible.
 any ideas?

You can  have the cdr_odbc or cdr_mysql module loaded and have the cdr
in an external database 
Once in there you can get any report/format you want with minimum
programming.
The issue is that you need a machine running the database 24/7

Another option is to use the manager interface and an external client to
collect the cdr events
The manager interface can be setup to output only the cdr events and the
resource requirements on the machine running asterisk are minimal.
The downside is that you also need an external client running 24/7 to
collect them.


Stelios




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SMS()

2013-02-20 Thread Stelios Koroneos

 On Tuesday 19 February 2013, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
  Thanks for the help.  Right now I'm running asterisk on a raspberry pi
  using a phone number from flowroute.  Is using a company like flowroute
  the same as connecting to the PSTN?  Also i've tried to install smsq but I
  couldn't find any good documentation to get it setup properly.  So no, I'm
  not using smsq.
 
 The bad news:  You need a GSM modem to send SMS messages.
 
 The good news:  It is not so.
 
 You can send SMS messages on POTS or ISDN lines
 See the voip-wiki about it
 

In the US (and other parts of the world) there are SMS gateways the
providers offer to reach their subscribers
They are free and since you are using a raspberry which means no direct
pstn interface might be a good approach with the help of some AGI/bash
scripting

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to connect a POTS robo alert dialer to asterisk with email notification

2013-02-03 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 18:36 -0500, David Smiley wrote:
 Hello!
 
 I'm totally new to the world of Asterisk, and so my apologies in advance if 
 my question has been asked before or is in the manual because I'm too new to 
 even know what to search for.
 
 I own a property far-away that isn't inhabited year-round.  I want to come up 
 with a low-temperature alert system so I can be notified that there is 
 insufficient heat for whatever reason (e.g. failed boiler, or ... ?).  There 
 are some systems in the several hundreds of dollars price range that could 
 either hook up to my WIFI to a monitoring service (sometimes with monthly 
 fees), or a cell-phone based one that sends a text message.  Then there are 
 inexpensive ones for about $60 that can hook up to a plain old telephone jack 
 and dial a number with an automated voice to alert the receiver of the 
 problem.  But I don't want to buy phone service to this place just for this 
 device.
 
 So I'm wondering if I could buy an adapter of some sort with a phone port and 
 ethernet port.  An ATA?  But then I'm sure it'd need to talk to some sort 
 of VOIP service.  Where I live year-round I have an underpowered 
 build-your-own HTPC computer that stays on the internet all the time and 
 occasionally I access it remotely.  Perhaps I could install asterisk there.  
 But then I have no idea.  Ultimately I want to get notified somehow (e.g. 
 email) that this phone dialer sent an alert.  Maybe this is more trouble than 
 its worth :-)
 
 ~ David
 --

Usually the problem with remote locations is the absence of (low cost)
internet connections.

If you have internet access to the property all year round, then get a
usb temperature monitoring dongle (there are several prices around 15-20
$) and find/write a script to query it every X amount of minutes and
send you a notification either by email or even sms using a (usually
free) email to sms gateway

Again if you have internet access you can put the monitor device that
has PSTN output to an ATA and have the ata register to an asterisk at
your home,so you won't need to pay monthly fees to a Voip provider.
That would require to setup a permanent asterisk server at your main
house, but you could do it with VM image and avoid setting up a new PC
You then need to do some port forwarding in your router for ports 5060
(for the sip signaling)  and 1-11000 for the RTP stream
Assuming you don't have static ip's in either place you will also need
to set up DynDNS so that the phone knows where to find asterisk

There are several other options but which one is best  depends on
budget, knowledge for hooking up the stuff and time it takes to do it :)

Stelios




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] RTP timeout if the asterisk box behind NAT

2013-02-03 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:38 -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote:
 Dears;
 
 I am facing a problem in disconnecting the calls, it is related to the 
 rtptimeout (disconnecting if there is no RTP packets from both sides).
 
 My Asterisk Box is behind NAT but there is a static real IP address at the 
 ADSL router. We call from the Mobile to the PSTN analogue numbers which are 
 connected to Asterisk Analogue card (the telephone lines are analoge), and 
 then we dial the overseas number, so the asterisk is sending the call to a 
 VoIP service provider which will route the call to the destination. Sometime 
 the destination is connected while ringing !! And this is a problem from the 
 SIP service provider route, then we hangup our mobile (as no one answering 
 our call) but asterisk is not detecting the hangup (it is because the 
 telephone lines are analoge and this problem is common in analoge lines that 
 some hangup are not detected). In that case, the call will stay open and 
 charging and this is a wrong.
 
 This problem was not appearing when Asterisk machine was having static real 
 IP address because I was enabling the rtptimeout paramters. But now as the 
 asterisk box IP address is private and it is behind NATing then it is 
 appearing even I enabled the (rtptimeout=50 and rtpholdtimeout=120).
 
 What should I do?
 

My advice is to first try to fix your pstn hangup detection problem.
Relying on rtptimeout assumes that the voip side has hanged up and the
voip provider has also terminated the call and no rtp is coming.
Which means that if your pstn caller terminates the call and the voip
side does not (for any reason) you will still be charging the pstn
caller.

To see why rtptimeout does not work get a wireshark capture and see if
there is still traffic going on 
-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How often to restart Asterisk...

2013-01-12 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 15:09 -0600, Danny Nicholas wrote:
 The general rule seems to be, don’t restart it unless there’s a
 problem or you hear of memory leaks.  I had a version of 1.4 that I
 restarted every night because I read about memory leaks, but I hear of
 1.2 installs that have been running continuously for 10 years.
 


I can confirm that 1.2 (although ancient) seems to be the version with
the least issues in terms of memory leaks/restarts etc
(This is based on approx 650 devices i am currently monitoring)
Usually we do a yearly shutdown to replace power supplies and some
hardware maintenance/cleaning 
I have a few machines running for 3+ years without any restart/reboot
(these are custom powerpc boards in some hard to reach places)

That said, if you have an external facing asterisk (i.e accessible
public Internet) don't even think about it...

Latest 1.4 and 1.6.2 seem decent, although we will be switching to 1.8
on new installs and upgrades this year, due to LTS status

The biggest issue i have faced in term of stability is badly written AGI
scripts that tend to hog resources and bring systems down in the end.


Stelios




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] How often to restart Asterisk...

2013-01-12 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Veering off topic, but still curious :)

Since an AGI only exists for part of the life of a single call, how
does 
it accumulate enough resources to be a problem?

Call goes away...AGI thread stays back in some zombi state waiting for
something (most of the times response from another web service)
That leaves you with an interpreter (probably PHP) fully loaded plus
whatever buffers/magic it had acquired stuck in memory.
If you are *really lucky* it will be stuck in a blocking function
bringing the core its running to 100% utilization and you might notice
it.
if not you are in for a random(15) days crash 




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk on arm

2012-09-04 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 17:53 +, Giuseppe Longo wrote:
 Hi,
 has anyone tried asterisk on arm processors? how is the performance?
 have encountered problems in the compilation?
 

Have run asterisk up to 1.4 using openembeded on several arm boards in
the past.
In general works well with sip/iax calls with minimum or no transcoding.
(i think you could do a couple of g729 channels on the RasPi, haven't
tested though)
For call recording that someone mentioned i think its going to be very
difficult regardless of stripping or custom compiling to achieve any
good results as it needs lots of resources and heavy i/o which bogs
things down.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Reverse phone lookup service

2012-08-13 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings to all.

We have developed an application for asterisk to accept creditcards
using the Authorize.net gateway.
I am looking at reverse phone lookup services in order to get the *full*
address of the caller (not just state,city).
This is a very low volume service as you can imagine so i would prefer
something with low or no minimums and a pay-as-you-go scheme.

An API would be a plus, although not necessary (i.e we can handle web
forms).
Anyone using or know a service that would like to recommend ?

Thanks in advance

Stelios S. Koroneos


P.S Sorry for the cross-post 
 


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] any working calling card solution open source

2012-07-17 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 20:51 +0100, Goke M Aruna wrote:
 thank Carlos,
 
 
 Thanks but too big for a demo interms of setup no demo data.
 
 
 I got the astcc working but still looking for alternative
 
 


A2billing takes less than 30 minutes to setup on an Ubuntu server.
It's true it has a steep learning curve, especially to understand the
way things are done for customer/card generation but after that its
pretty easy to support and a rather robust solution for calling cards.

Contact me off-list if you want assistant in setting up a demo system








--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] IAX MOS Score measuring solution

2011-08-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings !

Has anyone used any solution for getting the MOS Score on IAX channels
using codes like g729.
I have found a few but all are measuring sip and/or a-ulaw.

Regards

Stelios


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] concurrent call tracking

2011-05-11 Thread Stelios Koroneos

You can use the manager api (interface) and poll that info and then
store it in a MYSQL table etc.
You can do this outside asterisk,even from a different machine using
your preferred  dev language as there are manager libraries/bindings for
most major dev languages

'Actual' is the key word though.
To get the actual concurrent channels you should poll the system, at
least every second, and that means 3600 records per hour or 86.400 per
day. That would end up taking a alot of time to average using mysql
queries.

Alternatively you could do N minutes averages and store them in the db
i.e read every second but save the average of 60 reads which is 1 minute
etc


Stelios


On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:57 -0700, Skyler wrote:
 Hi all,
  
  
 
  I would like to track/store concurrent call usage per user by
 day/week/month and get server totals by day/week/month. Google comes
 up with mostly info regarding concurrent call limits, though my goal
 is to calculate actual concurrent channel usage and add it into
 reporting. I’m using * 1.6.2 + mysql – realtime (no gui). Any
 suggestions / open-source / AGI on where to start looking into
 implementing something like this? 
 
  
 
 TIA,
 
  
 
 Skyler
 
  
 
  
 
 
 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk, SIP Firewalls

2011-04-27 Thread Stelios Koroneos


On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 10:16 -0700, Myles Wakeham wrote:
 Well there is one 'optimization' that I need to sort out.  There seems 
 to be some latency between the Asterisk server (and the SIP Phones) and 
 callers.  Depending on the caller's network (ie. POTS, Cell phone, other 
 Voip, etc.) we find about 30% of the time that there is a small delay 
 (about 1/2 a second) between us talking and the caller hearing it, which 
 makes it sound like the caller is talking to an offshore company located 
 in South Asia.  I have read numerous posts, discussions, etc. about this 
 sort of thing and it seems that it has something to do with our 
 Firewall, QoS, etc. and I'm entertaining moving the entire Asterisk 
 server outside of our Firewall, and connecting the SIP phones to it on 
 an entirely separate sub-net with a dedicated NAT router.
 
1/2  second latency i dough it could be attributed to a firewall/qos,
unless your Internet connection is saturated with p2p or some other high
volume traffic (movie/radio streaming) or your firewall is running on
some slow machine with too many rules for packet inspection etc.
If that's the case moving asterisk to public ip wan't fix it.

As a first indication you could add a qualify=yes in all your sip
peers to see how long it takes them to talk to asterisk.



 It kinda scares me though.  I know that SIP is an attractive 
 attack-vector, and that there are scripts out there that target SIP 
 devices.  I know I could run Fail2Ban on the server, which is fine 
 (we're doing that anyway now), but before I go down this path, I wanted 
 to get general feedback if we are using our Asterisk system using 'best 
 practices' or whether it should never be sitting behind a Firewall, 
 despite the fact that it is working pretty close to perfect as it is 
 right now.  I just want to find a way to reduce the latency.
 
 Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
 

90% of the problems i see with asterisk security has to do with bad
configuration, bad dialplans and bad security policies (weak
passwords,no monitoring) etc.
The other 10% can be protocol or asterisk security issues but usually
these get fixed before script-kiddies get a chance to use them.

In your case since all your sip traffic would be coming from a single IP
address (of your provider) things are a bit easier to setup.

IMHO try to avoid as much as you can exposing asterisk to a public
ip/network and use it as a last resort method if everything else fails.


Stelios


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Vestec for Asterisk

2011-04-05 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Talk to Vestec.
As far as i know they are they ones that can re-issue the license code.

Kashif Kahn (kahn at vestec.com) was very helpfull whenever i need it
info for my project.

Stelios

On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:36 +0100, Lee Archer wrote:
 Hi, I installed the Vestec module to one of my development Asterisk
 servers a few months ago but now I need to move the license to another
 host.  Does anyone know how to do this?  I’ve had a look on my Account
 page on the Digium website but it only shows the Language Pack, and I
 can’t do anything with this either.
 
 Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
 
 Thanks
 
 
 Lee
 
 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Debian Lenny with timerfd

2011-01-24 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 01:09 -0500, RR wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Paul Belanger
 pabelan...@digium.com wrote:
 On 11-01-23 10:24 PM, RR wrote:
  email from Kevin Flemming talking about =2.6.27 so thought
 I'd ask esp. coz
  I have 2.6.26-2 yet I don't think I have timerfd on my
 machine...and I see,
  the following
 
 If you read CHANGES, you will also see you kernel 2.6.25+
 *and* glibc
 2.8+.  Lenny ships with 2.7-1
 
 
  
  
 yep, had read that too, just very new to debian so was fearing I'll
 have to do a manual install / upgrade of glibcI guess that's what
 I have to do :( will figure out how to do that.
  

Just an FYI.

Be sure to test it to a non production system, trying to replace glibc
from source is not an easy task. 
*MANY* things need tweaking and lots of apps can break with the wrong
glibc version. 




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TTS for asterisk

2010-05-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:51 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
 The Cepstral paid version has several languages available and other voices
 for those 10 people who don't like Allison.  At $35.00 a pop, it's not
 prohibitive (Lumenvox is much more pricey)

This is the initial cost, there are also per port licensing costs for
usage.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] User on PC?

2010-03-01 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 23:46 +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
 I'm looking for a way for linux to query a pc if user X is on, and has 
 used the pc recently or the screensaver is not active.
 
 If so, I'll route a call for user X to the phone near that PC.
 
 Ideas, anyone?
 

'who' can give you info who is logged in and when for all terminals on a
linux machine.
Also 'fgconsole' will be usefull.
This assumes you got remote access (ssh probably) to the machine and you
are able to execute commands as root (for the fgconsole at least)
Check also the XDMCP protocol for the X Display Manager XDM, KDM, GDM
etc (not sure which one your machines will be running) as it can provide
some info also

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Fax

2010-02-18 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:43 +0800, Gopalakrishnaiyer Venugopal-Q16770
wrote:
 Hi All
  
 I am using a Asterisk 1.6.1.6 and I have Digium cards TE122B for the
 PRI line and TDM800P cards for connecting the telephone lines.The
 voice calls are working fine.Now I need to connect FAX machines to
 this TDM800P cards.Kindly let me know what all changes I need to make
 to make the normal FAX call work?

Got some 'tips' on getting fax (passthrough) to work with asterisk on my
blog recently
http://skoroneos.blogspot.com/2010/02/solving-fax-issues-in-asterisk.html

Hope they are helpful.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Linux/Asterisk on game consoles?

2009-10-16 Thread Stelios Koroneos
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 08:16 +0200, Vincent wrote:
 Hello
 
 I don't know much about game consoles, and I was wondering if someone
 had successfully ported Linux and Asterisk to the current hardware,
 ie. Nintendo Wii, Sony PS3, or Microsoft XBox360?
 
 Thank you.
 

I did it with PS3 and Asterisk 1.2 about a year ago
With Yellow Dog linux running on PS3
Was not using any of co-processors though, just the main cpu.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Start asterisk on boot

2009-01-26 Thread Stelios Koroneos

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 09:32 +0100, Ralf Träskman wrote:
 Hi
 
  
 
 We runs asterisk 1.6 on a ubuntu 8.04 server.
 
 How can I get asterisk to start at boot?
 
 I have created an file named asterisk in /etc/event.d and put in this
 
  
 
 
# This service maintains Asterisk from the point the system is
# started until it is shut down again.
 
description Asterisk daemon
 
start on runlevel-2
stop on shutdown
 
respawn
exec //usr/sbin/asterisk –f
 
  
 
 But it doesn’t work.
 
  
 
 Regards
 
 /ralf 
 
  
 
 
 
 Ralf Träskman, IT
 AdLibris AB, Odengatan 106, 113 22 Stockholm, Sweden
 Dir: +46-(0)707548074, vxl: +46-(0)85460 60 00, fax: +46-(0)85460 60
 99
 r...@adlibris.com www.adlibris.com 
 P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
 
  
 
 

I am using the /etc/init.d/asterisk startup file and works
Just make sure that permissions are set correctly.
The default asterisk package from ubuntu reps runs as non-root so if you
have installed it prior to installing 1.6 some things will be warped.



-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Which policy for ISDN BRI support in NT/PtMP ?

2009-01-26 Thread Stelios Koroneos

 
 So my opinion is that these NT-PTMP is really and urgently needed,
 especially if this TEI management is rather complex and therefore
 would take a long time to develop and stabilize.
 The alternative is to keep using those Patton, Quintum, etc ... boxes
 which is not what we would prefer ;-))
 


As a quick alternative look at zaphfc and friends, but don't expect it
to be trouble-free.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Anyone flying with BA on Monday for Astricon ?

2008-09-20 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings to all !

I will be flying on Monday with BA from London to Phoenix so i was
wondering if anyone else is on the same plane so there will more than
inflight movies to pass the time :)

If so please contact me off-list and we can arrange to meet.
-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Anyone flying with BA on Monday for Astricon ?

2008-09-20 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings to all !

I will be flying on Monday with BA from London to Phoenix so i was
wondering if anyone else is on the same plane so there will more than
inflight movies to pass the time :)

If so please contact me off-list and we can arrange to meet.

-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] iLBC and G729 codecs

2008-09-07 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Make sure there is no noload = codec_ilbc.so in the module folder
You can also try to manually load the codec from the cli try load
codec_ilbc.so
For g729 you need to buy a licence from Digium.


-- 
Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence

Tel +30 210 9858296 Ext 100
Fax +30 210 9858298
http://www.digital-opsis.com


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Digital-OPSiS is giving you the chance to Win A FREE Astricon Pass

2008-08-18 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Digital-OPSiS is offering a Free Exhibitors Pass, valued at $695 to one
lucky winner. 

Register at http://www.digital-opsis.com/astricon08 to be part of the
Digital-OPSiS team and get all the action of Astricon. 
For those of you who register we have more offerings 

  * A discount code that entitles you to a 15% discount to all
Astricon registrations.*
  * A free Expo Hall Pass (valued at $50), so you can visit the
Astricon Expo and see us at the Digital-OPSiS booth*.  

The Free Exhibitor Pass includes access to all conference and
pre-conference activities. For those who want a bit of background on
Asterisk, the Asterisk 123 pre-conference seminar is ideal. Developers
won't want to miss the Developer 101 activity, which provides a chance
to catch up on the latest additions and changes to the Asterisk code
base. Or the Asterisk Ecosystem, where you can learn the latest and
greatest of the new products out for Asterisk. The Pass also includes
all other conference activities. This Includes 

  * Pre Conference Activities - Tuesday, September 23. Your choice
of: 
  * Asterisk 123
  * Asterisk Ecosystem
  * Asterisk Developer 101
  * In addition, you will receive access to the following events
Tuesday night: 
  * AstriCon Expo Hall Opening Reception
  * Code Zone Opening Party
  * All Conference Sessions - Wednesday, Sept. 24 - Thursday, Sept.
25 
  * All Tutorial Sessions - (Wednesday-Thursday)
  * All General Session Conference Presentations -
(Wednesday-Thursday)
  * The Asterisk Exhibit Hall - (Tuesday-Thursday)
  * All Lunches and Breaks
  * All BOF Sessions
  * All Panel Discussions

The lucky winner will be announced, Friday August 22nd at the Voip Users
Conference http://VoipUsersConference.org

*Code is valid till September 21st 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] does asterisk 1.4.20 run on a 486 sx

2008-06-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Depending on the gcc version you use you need to set it to produce i486
code.
The illegal instructions are probably because the default makefile builds
for a later arch.
Also without an fpu and fp kernel emulation don't expect things like dtmf to
work. Kernel fp emulation is very slow.



Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jerry Geis
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:40 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] does asterisk 1.4.20 run on a 486 sx
 
 I have compiled asterisk 1.4.20 on a 486 (sx) machine. No 
 floating point but math emulation is used in the kernel.
 When I run asterisk -vc all I get is Illegal instruction.
 
 I compiled as normally I do. Whats my next step. this is 
 download source and compiled.
 
 Jerry
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register 
 Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] time on asterisk

2008-06-12 Thread Stelios Koroneos
GMT timezone does not have daylight savings, so probably this is why you
have the wrong time
Select a timezone for a city and usually the correct daylight parameters are
used
 

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com http://www.digital-opsis.com/ 


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Ramos
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:00 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] time on asterisk


hi mats,

i'm using 64-bit Ubuntu Server Edition 8.04
I just use GMT+0, but i'm on Singapore whcih should be at GMT+8, but if i
use GMT+8 the system does not give the correct time.

i'm not using ntp, coz when i do i also don't get the correct time.

i'm not sure how i can fix this, is this an ubuntu issue?

regards,
ron

--- On Thu, 6/12/08, mkn0014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



From: mkn0014 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] time on asterisk
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008, 8:20 AM


Nhadie Ramos wrote:
 Hi Sir,

 I tried restarting asterisk, but still it has the wrong time.

 I tried restarting the system, then start asterisk it still uses the 
 wrong time.

 I also tried recompiling asterisk, checked i have the correct time on 
 the system,  then restart the system then start asterisk but still i 
 get the wrong time.

 My system time (currently) Thu Jun 12 15:12:11 GST 2008

 on asterisk i use EPOCH to look at the time,   
 NoOp(SIP/105101-00857e60, DATE: 20080612-081147)

 i would really appreciate any help. TIA

 ron

 --- On *Thu, 6/12/08, Tilghman Lesher 
 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

 From: Tilghman Lesher

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] time on asterisk
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008, 1:42 AM

 On Wednesday 11 June 2008 17:52:15 Nhadie Ramos wrote:
  I'm using gotoiftime on asterisk, but it seemsnbsp;
there is a difference
  between the asterisk time and the system time. could it be
because i
  adjusted the system timezone on my linux? do asterisk not detect
the change
  of timezone on the system? How can I fix this prob?

 Yes, that's probably the reason.  The system timezone is cached
once at
 startup, for performance reasons.  The only way to get it to pick up
the new
 timezone is a restart.

 -- 


 Tilghman
   


Ron,
What OS/Distro are you using ?
What timezone are you using ?
Do you use NTP for syncing time/date?


/Mats


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] No-mobo PC for USB Drives Enclosure?

2008-05-14 Thread Stelios Koroneos
As people have sugested the ATX power supplies can work without a mobo
One thing to watch out for your setup is the actual ampere requirments for
your disks
i.e Your power supply provides 300W but this is partitioned to different
voltages (+5, +12, etc) with different amp charecteristics
Disks need 2 voltages. One for the logic (+5V) and one for the motors (+12V)
and have different current requirments.
Most disk (if not all) mention these ratings on the labels they have
What you must do, is to see if by adding the current requirments seperatly
for +5V and +12V, does not exceed the power supply's amp rating *for that
voltage*, allowing also for a 15% -20% margin, as power consumption will be
higher than the nomimal mentioned during disk startup (and you will be
starting all your disks at the same time)
Also make sure your box has sufficient cooling and there is some short of
airflow over the disks, as the number 1 enemy of disks is high temperature
and stacking so many disks in a box will create large amounts of heat.

I would suggest you to get a good (aka expensive) 500W power supply and use
10-12 disks with it to avoid problems in the long run,
Also keep in mind that MTBF specs of SATA disks does not make them an ideal
candidate for 24/7/365 operations

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Matthew Rubenstein
 Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:31 AM
 To: Col Ferguson
 Cc: Asterisk -Users
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] No-mobo PC for USB Drives Enclosure?
 
 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:06 +1000, Col Ferguson wrote:
  If I understand right, your problem is that the power 
 supply won't turn on ?
  ATX power supplies can be told to turn on by jumpering 2 
 pins on the 
  motherboard power connector. From memory its the Green wire 
 and one of 
  the black wires, I usually use the next one inwards. 
 Pinouts for the 
  connector can be found via Google.
  If the power supply also has an external on/off switch you 
 can jumper 
  these pins and use the switch to turn the power on or off.
  
  Hope this helps,
 
   Thanks, that sounds like exactly what I was looking 
 for. Is there any safety risk from jumpering that sensor? 
 Like some kind of extra sensor, like voltage feedback, 
 temperature or somesuch.
 
   If this works, it might point to a good way to reduce 
 redundant Asterisk servers, which suck power, by just 
 plugging the drive from each old server into the USB of a 
 single server with a merged dialplan and a few other tweaks 
 to point at several different mounted drives, rather than one 
 per host/IP#.
 
 
  Col
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Matthew Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Asterisk -Users asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:22 PM
  Subject: [asterisk-users] No-mobo PC for USB Drives Enclosure?
  
  
   I have over a half-dozen different SATA hard drives, each with 
   different data (configs, voiceprompts, voicemail, CDRs, AGIs) for 
   each one's different user groups and applications. Each 
 one's load 
   on the Asterisk server is small enough that one server 
 can host them 
   all, accessed easily over USB.
  
   But right now, each one is in its own external USB enclosure on a 
   powered USB hub. I want to combine them all into a single large 
   enclosure. I tried to use a single PC chassis, leaving 
 the USB hub 
   inside with the drives screwed into it, and powered from the PC 
   power supply as internal drives on the proper drive power output 
   plugs. But without a PC motherboard plugged into the 
 power supply, 
   too, the power supply won't start up to power the drives.
  
   I don't want to add a motherboard: that costs money, and sucks 
   power, and is totally unnecessary. I just want to make 
 this gutted 
   PC chassis power my drives only, and have them connect to the 
   complete PC sitting next to it via the single USB cable 
 coming out 
   of the drive chassis. How do I do that?
  
   Is it possible to use the extra, unused floppy power 
 plugs to power 
   more hard drives, with an adapter? Is it possible to split the 
   existing hard drive power plugs to each power multiple 
 drives? How 
   many drives can I split each power plug into? The power 
 supply is a 
   cheap 300W unit, and the drives draw max under 9W each:
   http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=311 . 
 So can I 
   power 25-30 of these drives, or at least 10?
   --
  
   (C) Matthew Rubenstein
  
  
   ___
   -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by 
 http://www.api-digital.com 
   --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
   --
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG.
   Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 

Re: [asterisk-users] Newbie alert: VoIP hardware

2008-05-07 Thread Stelios Koroneos

Questions:
[1] Can I use oslec for echo cancellation? I'll have beefy hardware.
Is echo cancellation necessary?

Yes you can use oslec provided that either your distribution has a zaptel
package with the oslec patch (or you build the zaptel drivers + oslec
yourself)
Well without echo cancelation you will probably have a number of calls that
have either very bad sound quality or are simply annoying
With your set i.e 3-4 lines processing requirments are minimal so you should
not worry about that.We have been able to run oslec for 4 lines on a 266Mhz
(no its not Ghz) powerpc embedded board with very good results

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com http://www.digital-opsis.com/ 


 



  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Repo
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:11 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Newbie alert: VoIP hardware


Hello,

Please forgive me for i'm not an asterisk user yet. I've done as much
research as I can .. and have the following questions.

I'm setting up a new office and a home office and i'm shopping for hardware.


Office: 2 analog lines
Hardware: TDM412B (2 FXO, 1FXO)
Link: http://www.voipsupply.com/index.php?cPath=99_555_556
Cost: $303

Home: 1 analog line
Hardware: TDM421B (2 FXS, 1 FXO)
Link: http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=3980
Cost: $300
[2] Can I get PCI express x1 cards for the same price?

I'm on budget, Any other cards (sangoma? rhino?) that might work well?

I'm sure these questions have been asked before.. :-)

Steve




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Running Asterisk as root

2008-05-06 Thread Stelios Koroneos
In general, if your asterisk is accesible from the internet its much better
to have it run as a non-root process.
(My opinion is that this should be the default out-of-the-makefile ;)
asterisk behaviour)
This is the norm for more of the servers/services running on a linux
system, and can act as a safety-net when things go bad


Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Christian
 Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:00 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Running Asterisk as root
 
 Hi all,
 I have seen discussions on this earlier on, but just want to 
 hear some quick thoughts.
 I am running v1.6 of Asterisk on my Ubuntu installation, I 
 did make config to make it run at boot. Since I've got a 
 firewall and don't have any other servers running I am not 
 worried. I have been htinking about running Asterisk as a 
 seperat user, but haven't done that yet.
 Everything is working fine.
 What do you think?
 Thanks,
 Christian
 
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Hyperthreading and multicore

2008-04-29 Thread Stelios Koroneos
 Asterisk didn't benefit much from having HT enabled on a P4 
 with HT capability.
 

There are several things that make a difference when optimizing for a
specific processor in order to take advantage of its features.
Gcc version used to build asterisk (and the system in general) and compile
flags can make a big difference
A lot of the ready made solutions use very generic optimization as they
are trying to be compatible with a wide range of cpu core's and
architectures.
This has the advantage of having a single binary image to distribute but you
pay for it in terms of performance.
In most cases the performance penalty is not noticable in small/home
installations but you start to notice it when you push the system to its
resource limit
(i.e cpu, memory,pci bus access etc) either because you handle a lot of
calls or your system is resourse limited i.e embedded boards.
So in general if you need to get the maximum performance out of a system,
make sure you build asterisk tuned for that system and not a generic
build.
Running code with 486 instruction set, with command scheduling for pentium
its not going to give you max performance regardless of the fact that your
cpu/core supports HT or not.



Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone have a method of keeping an incrementaltally of calls?

2008-04-08 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Hi JR !

You could use dbget/dbput to have something like that

i.e 

Set(foo=${DB(counter/counter_val)})
Set(foo=${MATH(${foo}+1)}) ;
Set(DB(counter/counter_val)=${foo})

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 JR Richardson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:02 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Anyone have a method of keeping an 
 incrementaltally of calls?
 
 Hi All,
 
 I thought I read a post a while back of a system call or 
 something in the dialplan whereby a call count can be 
 incremented and spit out to a text file.
 
 Not like a group count of active channels.
 
 What I would like to accomplish is have an incremental count 
 of a specific dialplan routine that gets called, so after a 
 week or month, I can see how many times a specific dilaplan 
 action has been used.
 
 Thanks for any advice.
 
 JR
 --
 JR Richardson
 Engineering for the Masses
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Finding iaxy's (iaxies?)

2008-03-29 Thread Stelios Koroneos
I haven't used any Iaxy but from the example it looks like once you ping the
ip of the Iaxy it will responde with a udp packet from port 
So you don't actually ping the  port, but again as I said never used it
so I could be wrong

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Steve Edwards
 Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 4:01 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Finding iaxy's (iaxies?)
 
 According to http://kb.digium.com/entry/12/
 
   The Iaxy will respond to pings on port . You can ping your
   broadcast IP on your network and listen with tcpdump on your
   network on port  which will show the Iaxy 
 responding and what
   IP address it is coming from.
 
   Ex.
   ping 192.168.1.255
   tcpdump -i eth0 udp port 
 
 Before I get my karma whacked again, does this work for anybody?
 
 1) Shouldn't ping 192.168.1.255 be ping -b 192.168.1.255
 
 2) Aren't pings ICMP and thus invisible when tcpdump is 
 looking for UDP?
 
 3) How do you set a port on an ICMP ping?
 
 4) How do YOU find an Iaxy on your network?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 --
 --
 Steve Edwards  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice: 
 +1-760-468-3867 PST
 Newline Fax: 
 +1-760-731-3000
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone here using JUNGHANNS.net douBRI 2.0 ISDN ?

2007-12-03 Thread Stelios Koroneos
For the HFC-4S (4 bri channels) you need to qozap driver not zaphfc

Regards

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com


Quoting Elijah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi, 
 
 I'm very new to asterisk and managed to set one up in debian, I
 installed via apt-get the asterisk and asterisk-bristuff packages. I
 downloaded the bristuff source as well. 
 
 I managed to get as far as loading the following modules: 
 zaptel199144  4 cwain,zaphfc,zttranscode,ztdummy
 
 But the problem now is that all channels that I try to configure gives
 me an error that that device/address doesn't exist ..and only one
 unconfigured device is displayed in zttool. 
 
 
 Does anyone have any experience with this type of card? care to share
 some tips? 
 
 
 0c:02.0 ISDN controller: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH ISDN network
 Controller [HFC-4S] (rev 01)
 Subsystem: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH Unknown device b556
 Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 5
 I/O ports at ccf8 [size=8]
 Memory at d9fff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
 Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
 
 
 
 Regards, 
 Elijah 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Flash IDE

2007-09-11 Thread Stelios Koroneos
CF flash deviced work fine provided that

a) The CF has a wear leveling controller inside (not all do, especially the
cheap ones) so even a ext2 filesystem wan't create problems
b) You use a distro with read only (or partial write) filesystem .i.e logs
to ram or remote server etc

Other than that we have deployed a very large number of devices with
embedded linux in a CF (not all of them asterisk) with minimal problems



Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juan Sandro
 Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:04 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Flash IDE



 Hi

 We have a number offices accommodating 4-6 people each hence it is very
 important for PBX to be fanless and silent. We have been looking at using
 IDE flash disks also called DOM. The performance tests we have done so far
 satisfy our requirements, however we are concerned with DOM durability.

 We have installed debian and vanilla asterisk on 1GB DOM. All
 seems to work
 fine at the moment however will DOM last? How long it will last? Is anyone
 able to share similar experience? Any other information/tips?

 Regards,

 Juan
 _
 News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
 http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
 ___

 Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.
 http://www.astricon.net/

 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] bristuff for hfc card on Xscale 80219

2007-07-24 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Is your system compiled as BE or LE ?
bristuff will compile but will not work on BE systems without some
patches/endianess fixes as some of the buffer pointers are little endian
Also with the existing bristuff you will get invalid data due to the fact
that the cache controller of xscale can not snoop into the DMA transfer
cycles and update the cache
To avoid this you need to allocate a non cachable memory region for buffer.
In sort. Although it compiles it does not work :/


Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas Winter
 Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:44 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] bristuff for hfc card on Xscale 80219


 Hi,

 compile and load of modules works fine.

 After ztcfg I can see
 .
 .
 Changing signalling on channel 1 from Unused to Clear channel
 Changing signalling on channel 2 from Unused to Clear channel
 Changing signalling on channel 3 from Unused to HDLC with FCS check

 and then the board is frozen.

 Any ideas?

 regards
 Thomas


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yieldinggains at high call volumes

2007-06-11 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Hi,

The system seems to be IO bound for some reason.
Reading at the older posts you mentioned that there is no significant disc
activity so it could be ethernet i/o and/or interrupts that are causing this
(old or insuficient ethernet driver maybe ?)
Usually this kind of i/o wait is present on machines that have run out of
memory and need to swap to disk

Also with regard to the higher system usage on multicore systems, its very
probable that its due to task migration from core to core


 Here is something we recently noticed that may explain why the dual-core
 server is under-performing at high call volumes.  The following numbers
 were collected off both servers while they were in production.  Note
 that while they have similar cumulative idle values, the ratio of system
 time to user time on the single-core server is roughly 2.3 to 1, but on
 the dual-core server it is roughly 19.6 to 1.  I'm not quite sure what
 to make of this, but it seems to be very relevant to the problem.

   Mon Apr  2 12:15:01 EDT 2007
   Idle (sar -P ALL 60 14) (60 seconds 14 slices)
   Linux 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3smp (4core.imminc.com) 04/02/07

   12:24:01  CPU %user %nice   %system   %iowait %idle
   12:25:02  all 14.97  0.03 34.25  0.92 49.82
   12:25:020  8.83  0.05 33.60  1.28 56.24
   12:25:021 17.50  0.02 34.60  0.57 47.32
   12:25:022 19.94  0.02 33.52  1.31 45.22
   12:25:023 13.62  0.02 35.29  0.52 50.55

   Thu May 10 15:30:01 EDT 2007
   Idle (sar -P ALL 60 14) (60 seconds 14 slices)
   Linux 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3smp (8core.imminc.com) 05/10/07

   15:38:01  CPU %user %nice   %system   %iowait %idle
   15:39:01  all  2.47  0.01 48.29  0.00 49.23
   15:39:010  2.92  0.00 53.17  0.00 43.91
   15:39:011  2.98  0.00 48.68  0.02 48.33
   15:39:012  2.47  0.02 48.61  0.00 48.91
   15:39:013  2.27  0.00 48.35  0.00 49.38
   15:39:014  2.38  0.02 47.38  0.00 50.22
   15:39:015  2.37  0.02 46.94  0.00 50.67
   15:39:016  2.23  0.02 46.63  0.00 51.12
   15:39:017  2.17  0.02 46.54  0.00 51.27

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com







___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: RE : [asterisk-users] Testing ISDN T1/E1 Bri and Pri etc.

2007-05-09 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Hello !

For isdn BRI, the zaphfc in NT mode works fine. Some equipment might require
voltage on the line (although they don't use it to powerup and it just draws
a few mil amps)
As for PRI never tested, i would be interested to know how your test goes


Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Intelligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gavin Henry
 Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
 Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: RE : [asterisk-users] Testing ISDN T1/E1 Bri and Pri etc.


 On 09/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Gavin,
 
  A second Asterisk server replacing the provider (best way), or
 doing a loop
  between two different ISDN ports on a same card (worst way)
 must help you.

 Thanks for that. Will get a spare * box.

 
  Best Regards,
  Francois BERGERET,
  France.
 
 
  -Message d'origine-
  De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
 Gavin Henry
  Envoyé : mercredi 9 mai 2007 09:40
  À : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Objet : [asterisk-users] Testing ISDN T1/E1 Bri and Pri etc.
 
 
  Hi All,
 
  Can anyone recommend any test kit that you can hook up your
 Pri/Bri cards to
  without having actual ISDN in your office. For example testing
 an * system
  before it goes to a clients office.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Gavin.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbcto ulaw

2007-04-28 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Oliver,

 SIP-phone --iLBC-- Asterisk ---ulaw PSTN-Gateway

 I get the following error:

 Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw

Does your phone support ilbc as a codec ?
Is the codec_ilbc loaded on the * box ?
Usually you get this kind of error when the codec is not supported

Stelios S. Koroneos

Digital OPSiS - Embedded Inteligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oliver Brandt
 Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:08 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Unable to find a codec translation path
 from ilbcto ulaw


 Hi!

 As the upstream of my DSL-connection is very slow, I'd like my
 sip-phones to use iLBC to connect to my *. My gateway provider only
 allows ulaw. Hence, I'd like to use the follwing setup:

 SIP-phone --iLBC-- Asterisk ---ulaw PSTN-Gateway

 I get the following error:

 Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw
 Setup SIP-phone:
 disallow=all
 allow=ilbc

 Setup PSTN-Gateway:
 disallow=all
 allow=ulaw

 I've googled for overn an houre. But no luck. So I'd really apreciate
 any help!

 Thanks!
 Oliver
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: On Topic: Cheapest Asterisk USB Key? (was: Re: [asterisk-users]Off Topic: Open Source USB Softphone)

2007-04-01 Thread Stelios Koroneos

   Here's a flipside of this subject: what is the absolute
 cheapest Linux
 device that can be connected to a PC's USB port? That has just enough
 power for a minimal Asterisk server running on it. The Asterisk just
 maintains a CDR database on its Flash memory, which it periodically
 submits over the PC's network connection with an HTTP hit on a remote
 full-service Asterisk server? No call handling, DSP or anything really
 number crunching, no telephony terminal or other services. The
 lowest-performance device that plugs into the USB, with its own Linux
 instance. In OEM quantity, under $50? Under $100?


When you say devices do you mean an off the self device or a module you
can use to build a custom device ?
In the first case there are a lot of fisrt generation routers coming into
the market at very low prices
for example
http://www.wirelesslan.gr/product_info.php?cPath=127products_id=866
http://www.wirelesslan.gr/product_info.php?products_id=670

If you are looking for a SoC type device there are several although, the
100$ range looks more realistic

There are several devices that could be used.
DimmPC comes in my mind - http://www.amctechcorp.com/dimmpci/index.html
Digi's Connectcore
http://www.digi.com/products/embeddedsolutions/connectcore9u.jsp

Check Linux devices for a larger list
http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8498487406.html


Hope it helps

Stelios



Stelios S. Koroneos
Digital OPSiS - Embedded Inteligence
http://www.digital-opsis.com



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Two or More Bri Cards

2007-03-26 Thread Stelios Koroneos
A lot of the problems people are having with ISDN have to do with the
service provider setup and not the cards (provided that we are talking about
2-3 HFC cards)
For example in Greece the local telephone company uses 3 diffrerent types of
ISDN equipment in their centers (Siemens,Ericsson,Alcatel)
We have seen a lot of trouble with a certain type and sporadic troubles with
the other two which 9 out 10 times had to do with their setup (1 out of 10
had to do with the line itself)

IMHO it has to do more with the ISDN timing itself (coming from the
telephone company side) and less with the number of interrupts a system can
handle.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Load balance Asterisk servers?

2006-11-13 Thread Stelios Koroneos
JR Richardson gave a very nice presentation at Astricon on how to do that with 
DUNDI
check 
http://www.astricon.net/files/usa06/Friday-General_Conference/JR_Richardson.ppt
http://www.astricon.net/files/usa06/Friday-General_Conference/JR_Richardson_Whitepaper.pdf

Stelios

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of voiplist
 Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:46 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Load balance Asterisk servers?
 
 
 We are looking to be able to put a device in front of an array of
 Asterisk systems which would do the job of load balancing them.
 
 We would store all the particulars on one or more MySQL servers.
 
 What want to accomplish is to have all calls sent to/from a single IP,
 then push the calls off to another Asterisk server in the array. If
 one server goes out, we are hoping there will be no effect other than
 we have reduced capacity until it's fixed.
 
 If possible we would like to do this with either a low cost device or
 an open source solution which can run on a Linux box.
 
 Can anyone suggest something that would be reliable in a production
 environment? We would like to make this solution scale to at least a
 few hundred simultaneous calls.
 
 We have looked at some ready made devices but many of them only
 support SIP, we need a solution that will support both IAX and SIP.
 
 Any advice would be most appreciated.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Embedded Asterisk

2006-10-20 Thread Stelios Koroneos
 Has anybody out there, on non-FPU embedded platorms, made any good use
 of things like ilbc and Speex?


The exisiting implementations of both run very poorly on a non-fpu cpu's,
especialy if clock speed  400 Mhz
I have run asterisk (and still do) on mips,ixp and powerpc (all without
fpu's) and i think that without modifications the codecs are not so usable
There are 3 options
1) Get a faster fp library - Been looking into the GoFast fp lib, no
definate results yet
2) Convert codecs to fixed point - Although i know a G729  fixed point
implementation exists haven't tested and i am not sure that a speex or ilbc
implementation exists.
4) Get a cpu with fpu :) - There are mips and powerpc cpu's (i am talking
the types used in embedded dev's) that have an fpu

I will be also at Astricon and brinking with me a powerpc based embedded
asterisk appliance  which has support for zaptel also.
Maybe we could exchange some ideas on the matter.


Stelios



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Kind of OT : Europeans going to Astricon

2006-10-10 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings !
Its kind of OT,  but if there are any Europeans going to Astricon in Dallas,
please send a message of-list.
It's possible we will be on the same flight,(i am flying from Frankfurt) ;)
so it will be a good way to know it's other and spend some of the 10 hours +
flight time .

Regards

Stelios



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Annoying Bristuff

2006-08-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos



Its 
working for me with no errors.
* 
1.2.10 bristuff 0.3.0-pre1s with kernel 2.6.15.4.
My 
setup is kind of "special" as its build with Openembedded and runs from a CF on 
a [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recently i was able to port *+bristuff + zaptel to an 
embedded powerpc platform and works there also without any major 
issues.

Why 
don't you trya 2.6 kernel maybe the problem is there (unlikely 
though)

Stelios

  HiCan anyone confirm a working asterisk 
  1.2 from bristuff with 1 port PCI, hfc-s based ISDN card (zaphfc driver). If 
  so, could you send your configuration. I mean OS (linux distribution) type, 
  kernel version.Thanks in 
advanceCheersAndrew
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Annoying Bristuff

2006-08-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos
sorry for the html post :(
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Load balenced (ADSL) network connections, is it possible?

2006-07-23 Thread Stelios Koroneos

  I need to put an Asterisk server in a remote office where only ADSL is
  available.  Maximum of 8meg downstream 646k upstream.
 

Is this an adsl2 line ?
If yes ask your provider if it supports channel bonding. You could use 2
adsl lines as one. All load balancing etc is done at the dslam side.
Also if annex M is supported you can get up to 3,5 mbits of upload
(theoreticaly, usually is close to 2mbits, heavily depends on distance and
line conditions)
If you need to load balance at your side (ie the office) it can be done but
would require setting up 2 * servers connected to each other and using some
form of round robing the dns so that requests reach both servers.
If the dsl line is also used for other purposes than voip, make sure that
you use qos or you will be facing problems with the quality of the calls.

Stelios

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TDMoE question

2006-06-25 Thread Stelios Koroneos
Greetings !
I am looking into the TDMoE functionality of the Zapata drivers and * and i
am kind of confused.
Lets say i have 2 linux boxes, one has * running but no fxs/fxo hardware the
other has a card (for example an x100p) but does not have * installed.
If i just want to use the card (no * reduduncy etc) from the machine that
runs *, do i need to
have * running on both boxes for this to work ? or loading the appropriate
drivers to the second machine will be saficient ?
The examples i have seen mention zapata.conf entries which make me think
that * should be running on both machines, but i am not sure if this applies
in my case.

Any ideas, thoughts, links etc are more than welcome

regards

Stelios S. Koroneos

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users