Awsome +1
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Warren Selby
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
On Wed, May 4
, May 10, 2011 1:17 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
Awsome +1
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Warren Selby
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non
I would never choose to use it. Our system is built on top of it (before I
ever got here) and it would be too great a task to change it not to mention
management would not go for a change.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Matt Riddell li...@venturevoip.com wrote:
On 5/05/11 3:02 AM, vip killa
@lists.digium.com
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only thing that stands out are two warnings:
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c: Error transmitting fax.
result=13: Unexpected message received.
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:01 AM, vip killa vipki...@gmail.com wrote:
screw that i just got hylafax to work with IAXMODEM...i refuse to pay
digium a dime... supposed to be open-source right?
I don't believe you really understand what Open Source means...it does not
mean FREE. It means that
I don't believe you really understand what Open Source means...it
does not mean FREE.
Actually, it DOES mean free, especially since Asterisk is under the
GPL. But, as RMS often says, that's 'free' as in 'free speech', not
'free beer'. That problem doesn't exist in French, where there are
two
It isn't any better than the so called t.38 support in Asterisk that
only drops calls. Gee I wonder why, maybe so they can sell their fax
product?
On Wednesday, May 4, 2011, Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011, vip killa wrote:
screw that i just got hylafax
The majority of open source projects out are NOT run by commercial
institutions... they are run by people committed to a better product (not to
making money)... they are maintained by people who have the resources to
host a repository (which does not take a lot of resources) and a community
of
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:43 PM, vip killa vipki...@gmail.com wrote:
The majority of open source projects out are NOT run by commercial
institutions...
Postfix kicks butt. But only because IBM paid for development, for a
long number of years, and because they hired somebody who had a really
good
On 05/06/2011 02:09 AM, David Backeberg wrote:
T.38 has a boatload of problems, and most of those problems are
because people who aren't employed by Digium did not read the specs,
or they did read the specs, but felt like they had to violate the
specs to get their code to work with a different
= notice,warning,error,debug,verbose,dtmf,fax
--
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:12:06 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only thing that stands out are two warnings:
[May 3
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only thing that stands out are two warnings:
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c: Error transmitting fax.
result=13: Unexpected message received.
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c
at logger.conf
full = notice,warning,error,debug,verbose,dtmf,fax
--
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:12:06 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.comvipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i
-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
I tried with those settings and without... same error:
WARNING[18090]: app_fax.c:820 transmit: Transmission failed
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:32 PM, satish patel
mailto:satish...@hotmail.com satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
did you
satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'd enable full debug at logger.conf and try to find issue.
-S
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:55:51 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
I tried with those settings and without... same error
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only thing that stands out are two warnings:
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c: Error transmitting fax.
result=13: Unexpected message received.
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:49 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
meaning asterisk can
:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *vip killa
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:49 AM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
meaning asterisk can receive only 1 fax at a time?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:47
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:02 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
screw that i just got hylafax to work with IAXMODEM...i refuse to pay
digium a dime... supposed to be open
using DAHDI.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:02 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote:
Does Hylafax support T.38?
The free fax works just fine with DAHDI. I've never tried to do T.38 with
that since it seems like it would be complicated and not give me much over
using DAHDI.
There is the t38modem[1]
From: vipki...@gmail.com mailto:vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only thing that stands out are two warnings:
[May 3 16:10:40] WARNING[18176] app_fax.c
On Wed, 4 May 2011, vip killa wrote:
screw that i just got hylafax to work with IAXMODEM...i refuse to
pay digium a dime... supposed to be open-source right?
Great attitude. Should be worth about a bazillion bad karma points.
--
Thanks in advance,
Eric Wieling wrote:
Does Hylafax support T.38?
Not at this time, no. And, I have no need for it.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
--
Steve Edwards wrote:
Should be worth about a bazillion bad karma points
+1
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
--
Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead the
way in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic project.
Hence, I refuse to pay Digium. Digium seems to make a bazillion dollars
off of these flaws by selling commercial support/addons anyway... so that
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead the way
in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic project. Hence, I
refuse to pay Digium. Digium seems to make a bazillion dollars off
On 4 May 2011, at 15:01, vip killa wrote:
screw that i just got hylafax to work with IAXMODEM...i refuse to pay
digium a dime... supposed to be open-source right?
There is so much wrong with that sentence, I don't know where to start.
On 4 May 2011, at 16:02, vip killa wrote:
Honestly
- Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
Non-T.38 faxing works well. I assume there are reasons you must use T.38.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip
On 4 May 2011, at 16:02, vip killa wrote:
Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead
the way in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic project.
Hence, I refuse to pay Digium. Digium seems to make a bazillion dollars
off of these flaws by selling
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
Non-T.38 faxing works reasonably well. I have some issues with some things
at Digium as well, but I'm not going to bite the hand that feeds me. I
assume that Digium takes most of the known bugs out of what they charge
On Wednesday 04 May 2011, vip killa wrote:
Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead the
way in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic project.
Hence, I refuse to pay Digium.
Don't worry. You can always get your money refunded if it breaks -- and
snip
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise timing inherent with a circuit-
switched
network, into something more suitable for sending over a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:00 PM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
...
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise timing inherent with a
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Andrew Latham wrote:
Faxing is considered a legal method of
doing business in many areas. Maybe lobbing for more effective
digital signatures would help get faxing removed from our everyday
lives.
From dictionary.com:
lob1
[lob] Show IPA
verb, lobbed, lob·bing, noun
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:00 PM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise timing inherent with a
Un-top-posting,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:01:37AM -0400, vip killa wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
*You are “Running before you learn to walk”! You can’t make T.38 work
(that’s ok, most other folks can’t either) but you want a free faxing
David Backeberg wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:00 PM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise
A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk writes:
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise timing inherent with a circuit-switched
network, into
On 5/05/11 3:02 AM, vip killa wrote:
Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead
the way in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic
project. Hence, I refuse to pay Digium.
So why do you use it?
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
On 05/05/2011 03:29 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
David Backeberg wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:00 PM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up
a fax
On 05/05/2011 01:07 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Un-top-posting,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:01:37AM -0400, vip killa wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Danny Nicholasda...@debsinc.com wrote:
*You are “Running before you learn to walk”! You can’t make T.38 work
(that’s ok, most other folks
You need spandsp i guess following is my dialplan is working example
[fax]
exten = 9000,1,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/fax.tif)
exten = 9000,n,Set(FAXFILENOEXT=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/${CALLERID(num)})
exten = 9000,n,ReceiveFax(${FAXFILE})
exten = 9000,n,Hangup()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011
i have spandsp and app_fax.so is loaded but i get:
app_fax.c:820 transmit: Transmission failed
when trying to fax from a POTS line...
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
You need spandsp i guess following is my dialplan is working example
[fax]
exten =
did you set faxdetect=both or incoming
and faxbuffer=?
-S
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:28:36 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have spandsp and app_fax.so is loaded but i get:
app_fax.c:820 transmit: Transmission
: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:28:36 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have spandsp and app_fax.so is loaded but i get:
app_fax.c:820 transmit: Transmission failed
when trying to fax from a POTS line...
On Tue, May 3, 2011
I'd enable full debug at logger.conf and try to find issue.
-S
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:55:51 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
I tried with those settings and without... same error:
WARNING[18090]: app_fax.c:820
...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'd enable full debug at logger.conf and try to find issue.
-S
--
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:55:51 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
I tried with those settings
Enable debug and verbose on CLI ?
Did you enable and also at logger.conf
full = notice,warning,error,debug,verbose,dtmf,fax
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:12:06 -0400
From: vipki...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] receive faxes
i have full log.. only
49 matches
Mail list logo
