Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-23 Thread Simone Cittadini
Adam Robins ha scritto: Thanks, but we already have the TOS bits set to 0xB8, which matches the QoS settings in our switches and routers. This is definitely something that changed in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade. We have a pair of identical 1.07 servers connected via the same network pipe that

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-23 Thread Adam Robins
IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning Adam Robins ha scritto: Thanks, but we already have the TOS bits set to 0xB8, which matches the QoS settings in our switches and routers. This is definitely something that changed in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade. We have a pair of identical 1.07 servers connected

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-23 Thread Martin Joseph
On Feb 23, 2006, at 4:58 AM, Adam Robins wrote: Thanks, We already have a cron reboot of all of our Asterisk servers every night. We've been doing this for over a year due to memory leak issues. ??? What do you think this is windows 95??? I had a problem like that I would be looking at

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-23 Thread Adam Robins
It happened with g729a as well -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Joseph Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 1:15 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-21 Thread Adam Robins
I am not running trunked IAX. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Willis Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-21 Thread Adam Robins
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning This is not going over the Internet. It is going over an MPLS IP-VPN. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael J. LiberatoreSent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:55 PMTo: Asterisk Users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-21 Thread Peter Fern
I had exactly the same experience running IAX2, but also experienced half-duplex calls on top of that (though I think that's a different but with IAX handoff), and in the end dropped it completely for SIP. We run g729 over dedicated fibre, and the resyncs were occurring all over the place

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-21 Thread Adam Robins
, February 21, 2006 7:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning I had exactly the same experience running IAX2, but also experienced half-duplex calls on top of that (though I think that's a different

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread yusuf
Adam Robins wrote: Hi Adam After many days of playing with the new jitterbuffer and trunking options for IAX2, I have finally received almost acceptable quality. I am receiving 5-8 complaints a day of calls breaking up from both the customer and agent sides. What I have discovered is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Adam Robins
: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning Adam Robins wrote: Hi Adam After many days of playing with the new jitterbuffer and trunking options for IAX2, I have finally received almost acceptable quality. I am receiving 5-8 complaints a day of calls breaking up from both

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Adam Robins
] On Behalf Of yusuf Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning Adam Robins wrote: Hi Adam After many days of playing with the new jitterbuffer and trunking options

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Jesus E Zepeda
, 2006 14:43 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning I have now set the resyncthreshold to -1, to turn it off. I have also set the maxjitterbuffer to 2000. I still received 10 complaints of choppy calls

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Adam Robins
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning Thanks, but we already have the TOS bits set to 0xB8, which matches the QoS settings in our switches and routers. This is definitely something that changed in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade. We have a pair of identical

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Michael J. Liberatore
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning so you think this problem is asterisk and not a internet problem? My customers also complain alot about IAX2 connection to teliax which seemed to work better in older * versions. I have tried everything with no success

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-20 Thread Mark Willis
Adam Robins wrote: This is definitely something that changed in the 1.07 to 1.24 upgrade. We have a pair of identical 1.07 servers connected via the same network pipe that do not exhibit these issues. I might try recompiling with the old jitterbuffer to see if it makes a difference.

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.4 IAX2 New Jitterbuffer Tuning

2006-02-18 Thread Adam Robins
After many days of playing with the new jitterbuffer and trunking options for IAX2, I have finally received almost acceptable quality. I am receiving 5-8 complaints a day of calls breaking up from both the customer and agent sides. What I have discovered is that in most of these cases, the