[Asterisk-Users] NAT and only been able to have 1 SIP phone behind
Guys. Ive read on the wiki that a common problem with nat is that you can only have 1 sip phone behind, how do you get around this issue? Having a sip enabled router behind the nat like the GS 488 489 or 486? Or how have you done it without having any kind of linux box (SER or *) behind the nat. The idea is to have 2 or more sip clients behind some NAT and been able to connect to a remote asterisk box. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT and only been able to have 1 SIP phone behind
Anton Krall wrote: Guys. Ive read on the wiki that a common problem with nat is that you can only have 1 sip phone behind, how do you get around this issue? Having a sip enabled router behind the nat like the GS 488 489 or 486? Or how have you done it without having any kind of linux box (SER or *) behind the nat. The idea is to have 2 or more sip clients behind some NAT and been able to connect to a remote asterisk box. I don't know why people think this. Any router with PAT (Port Address Translation) should work with multiple SIP clients behind NAT. Most routers support PAT (but may not call it that). ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] NAT and only been able to have 1 SIP phone behind
Thats exactly what I thought but there are many parts on the wiki where they mention the more than 1 SIP client behind NAT mmyth. Oh well, maybe an urban legend? :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling aka ManxPower Sent: Miércoles, 20 de Abril de 2005 06:04 a.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT and only been able to have 1 SIP phone behind Anton Krall wrote: Guys. Ive read on the wiki that a common problem with nat is that you can only have 1 sip phone behind, how do you get around this issue? Having a sip enabled router behind the nat like the GS 488 489 or 486? Or how have you done it without having any kind of linux box (SER or *) behind the nat. The idea is to have 2 or more sip clients behind some NAT and been able to connect to a remote asterisk box. I don't know why people think this. Any router with PAT (Port Address Translation) should work with multiple SIP clients behind NAT. Most routers support PAT (but may not call it that). ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
