The above concern have been a major issue with telephone equipment (eg,
central
offices) and the telco's spend a significant amount of money burying very
long
rods in the ground and interconnectng them with the CO hardware using cables
that are larger then 1/4 in diameter (don't
On Thursday 23 Feb 2006 20:34, Colin Anderson wrote:
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the conduit
On Thursday 23 February 2006 13:57, Bob Goddard wrote:
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
That's a great rule of thumb, but the reality
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
That's a great rule of thumb, but the reality isn't quite so black and white.
A direct
I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our
campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to
another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building
is several hundred metres away from my backbone. My only option for cabling
On Thursday 23 Feb 2006 17:30, Colin Anderson wrote:
I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our
campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to
another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building
is several hundred
I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our
campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to
another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building
is several hundred metres away from my backbone. My only option for
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the conduit for the provisioning of the
new building is unsuitable
Take a look at the Net2Net product which was purchased by Paradyne
and then by Zhone (www.zhone.com). They make a unit that will bridge
Ethernet over SDSL lines, 24 pairs will get you 50mbps through the
link. It looks just like ethernet and VoIP will work fine over it.
You can also
Colin Anderson wrote:
I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our
campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to
another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building
is several hundred metres away from my backbone. My
Colin Anderson wrote:
That aside, does anyone have opinions on my original question as to the
suitability of bonded links for VoIP?
It's not an issue. The bonded link acts just like any other link.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Colin Anderson a écrit :
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the conduit for the provisioning of
12 matches
Mail list logo
