Hello
how are you?
Can you give me advice on which are the best free or not (free prefered)
that use SIP Transfer.
Thanks a lot!!!
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join
We are currently using an older version of Eyebeam on our deployment and
keep having an issue with the disappearance of SIP accounts, and after
research found it is a bug on the version we currently have.
I am looking for a new softphone solution and I was wondering what
everyone was using
Does anyone know if you can use softphones on thin clients? I have a
new customer that wants to use Eyebeam (about 10 users) on a thin client
platform. Each user has a little box on their desk that has a USB port,
mic and headphone jacks and monitor.
I am worried about conflicts
On 20 May 2010, at 18:35, Carlos Chavez wrote:
I am worried about conflicts when running 10 softphones on the same
server since they will all try to use por 5060.
And the fact most terminal services servers/clients still don't support audio
input.. only output..
S
--
1. GPXE + HTTP
2. Tiny Core Linux
3. Profit...
~
Andrew lathama Latham
lath...@gmail.com
* Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software
* Learn more about Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux
* Learn more about Tux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux
On Thu, May
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones on thin clients...
On 20 May 2010, at 18:35, Carlos Chavez wrote:
I am worried about conflicts when running 10 softphones on the same
server since they will all try to use por 5060.
And the fact most terminal services servers/clients still
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Howes
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones on thin
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
Original Message
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones on thin clients...
From: Carlos Chavez cur...@telecomabmex.com
Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 1:36 pm
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users
...@mstvp.onsip.com sip%3amjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
Original Message
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones on thin clients...
From: Carlos Chavez cur...@telecomabmex.com
Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 1:36 pm
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
for the VoIP Users Conference every week.
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
Original Message
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones on thin clients...
From: Carlos Chavez cur...@telecomabmex.com
Date: Thu
hi all, i had installed asterisk on Centos 5.3, sip.conf and
extentions.conf are vi /etc/asterisk/sip.conf [general]
port =
5060
bindaddr = 192.168.1.2 (asterisk server ip addr)
context = others
[2000]
type=friend
context=my-phones
secret=1234
host=dynamic
[2001]
type=friend
context=my-phones
Hello.
I see this post many times. I have written this for you to get a start.
This is sip.conf
[general]
context=default ; Default context for incoming calls
allowoverlap=no ; Disable overlap dialing support. (Default is yes)
bindport=5060; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060)
You may be doing some thing wrong with Configuration of Softphone. Please
take a tutorial .. Google is a good friend. I suggest you to use X-lite
softphone.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:25 AM, ABBAS SHAKEEL shakeel.abbas@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
I see this post many times. I have written
Hello,
I am looking for a softphone which supports RPID (displaying the called
party name) and BLF features. I couldn't find one so far...
Any idea whether such a softphone exists?
Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:12:21 +0100, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the phone referred to that Jared mentioned is the Allnet
7960. I have an ongoing review of it here (meaning I never finished it
properly).
Thanks for the tip.
___
-- Bandwidth and
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:12:21 +0100, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://food4wine.ning.com/
BTW, we also want to receive call notifications on our cell phones. In
addition to using SMS, we found a cheaper alternative which is to use
iMode cellphones and subscribe to Bouygues Telecom's
On 7 Feb 2008, at 10:29, Vincent wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:12:21 +0100, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://food4wine.ning.com/
BTW, we also want to receive call notifications on our cell phones. In
addition to using SMS, we found a cheaper alternative which is to use
iMode
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:03:22 +, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is that some form of push notification?
Yup, it comes with the same push mail feature found in BlackBerry.
Much cheaper than either sending SMS's or taking a 3G subscription.
Can't wait for Wimax or cellphones over TV
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:56:37 + (GMT), Tim H. Panton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jared was talking about a decent IAX hardphone on this list a week or so back,
I don't recall the make.
Google didn't return anything with Jared IAX in the
gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.user archives.
You should
Vincent, the phone referred to that Jared mentioned is the Allnet
7960. I have an ongoing review of it here (meaning I never finished it
properly).
http://food4wine.ning.com/
On Feb 6, 2008 12:44 PM, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:56:37 + (GMT), Tim H. Panton
Hello
I need to hook up someone's remote PC onto our Asterisk server over
the Net. There are firewalls on each side, so I figured it's time to
give IAX a try, and see if it's less of a pain to use than SIP. And
since IAX hardphones are pretty are, I guess I'll go softphone.
Apparently,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Vincent wrote:
Hello
I need to hook up someone's remote PC onto our Asterisk server over
the Net. There are firewalls on each side, so I figured it's time to
give IAX a try, and see if it's less of a pain to use than SIP. And
since IAX hardphones are pretty are, I
: Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: 05 February 2008 08:07:01 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: [asterisk-users] [Softphones] ZoIPer vs. XLite?
Hello
I need to hook up someone's remote PC onto our Asterisk server over
the Net. There are firewalls on each
Marc Charbonneau wrote:
- shameless plugMy MediaX softphone :
http://www.marccharbonneau.com/asterisk/mediaxphone.php/shameless
plug
Marc, does your client play nicely with Vista? We've been having some
problems with softphones that work fine in XP, but choke in Vista.
--
Alan Williamson
Are other clients I should know about?
http://www.zoiper.com/
http://www.counterpath.com/
Add to that list
- Mozphone (http://mozphone.mozdev.org/) that can be installed in Firefox
-Kiax : http://sourceforge.net/projects/kiax
- shameless plugMy MediaX softphone :
Marc, does your client play nicely with Vista? We've been having some
problems with softphones that work fine in XP, but choke in Vista.
I don't know, never tried it since I couldn't find a machine with
enough power to run Vista decently ;)
Try it and let me know how it goes.
If it doesn't
family?
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce
ReevesSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:37 AMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Nick,I have done what you
DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Nick,I have done what you are talking about as far as being a
provider for family members. I used an IAX softphone mainly to eliminate the
need for so many holes in the firewall. And secondly because the idefisk
Hey all,
A previous annoyance with not being able to call out to my brother on FWD
from my Asterisk system had me thinking that since I have my own PBX, and
that system has it's own 1-to-1 static NAT to the internet, I should be
able to act as the provider for him or any of my family, and
Nick,
Anything helpful in the asterisk or system logs.
Try bumping up the debug and verbose levels see what shows up on the
console.
Weird that it would work inbound and not outbound.
Bob...
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 04:48 -0700, Nick Ellson wrote:
Hey all,
A previous annoyance with not
Bob,
I will up the logs today, have my phone at work with me. (though the Wife
and Kids are not up yet ;)
Anything specific I should target?
Nick
--
Nick Ellson
CCDA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI,
MCSE 2000, Security+, Network+
Network Hobbyist, VFR Private Pilot.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Bob Chiodini
Nick,I have done what you are talking about as far as being a provider for family members. I used an IAX softphone mainly to eliminate the need for so many holes in the firewall. And secondly because the idefisk IAX softphone allowed me to extract the zip version, configure the phone, and zip the
Bruce,
I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying to
figure out how to get it to send proper CallerID to the other phones, it
worked right off, in both directions. Excellent!
Perhaps working the IAX2 angle will be less of a hassle, I will go looking
for one that
, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote connectivity.
Bruce,
I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying to figure
out how to get it to send proper CallerID to the other phones
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce
ReevesSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:37 AMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Nick,I have done what you are talking about as far as being
- Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Micheal,I do this with the zip version of idefisk avaliable
here : http://asteriskguru.com/tools/idefisk_windows.phpI
download and extract the files the run the phone and configure the settings
Ellson
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote connectivity.
Bruce,
I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying to figure
out how to get it to send
, September 07, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote connectivity.
Micheal,
I do this with the zip version of idefisk avaliable here :
http://asteriskguru.com/tools/idefisk_windows.php
I download and extract
Great. Thanks very much
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Ellson
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
of the softphone?
Thanks again
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce
ReevesSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:46 PMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Micheal,I do
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Nick Ellson Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:07 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote connectivity.
Bruce, I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying
Of Nick Ellson
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Bruce,
I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying to
figure out
Does anyone know off hand which IAX softphone has IM
capabilities like XTEN?
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blake
KroneSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 3:34 PMTo:
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[asterisk-users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphones IAX vs. SIP, remote
connectivity.
Bruce,
I *just* tested the XtremePhone, IAX2 softphone. Other than trying to
figure out how to get it to send proper CallerID to the other phones
On 9/8/06, Nick Ellson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erm.. I mean LOUDHush and I went to look and the features did not list
Video, but the phone was listed in the video softphone section of the
catalog search I did. So, I see FullDisclosure with vulnerabilities in
IAX2 Video, I see questions asking
Background: I've been having some minor issues with our Sipura 841's.
Mostly it just relates to them being cheap phones.
One of the alternatives to buying new phones was using soft phones.
I'm curious what other people are using that works well.
I found NCH's SoftPhone Express Talk which is a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 7:50 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SoftPhones: Bad, or just bad QoS?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 05:19:05AM -0400, Tom
This is software. Use manageble software. If software means separate
setup on each desktop, then don't use it. If you spend that much time on
setting up phones, imagine how long it takes you to update other
software packages. This is, then, a symptom of a general problem.
I would like to
[snip]
as well as the software, while the Polycoms can be
centrally managed via TFTP/FTP/HTTP/HTTPS, etc.
You mean: getting close to almost barely good enough to be as
managable as a local software?
No, I mean, if I have 50 extensions, I can create one config file,
arrange it however I
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 05:19:05AM -0400, Tom Rymes wrote:
[snip]
as well as the software, while the Polycoms can be
centrally managed via TFTP/FTP/HTTP/HTTPS, etc.
You mean: getting close to almost barely good enough to be as
managable as a local software?
No, I mean, if I have
On Sunday 17 July 2005 05:19, Tom Rymes wrote:
[snip]
away. Central phone config means that I can make a change at 8:00PM and
all of my users will have received it when the offices open in the AM,
but softphones means I would have to remind everyone to leave their PCs
on so I could remotely
On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:20 PM, Time Bandit wrote:
Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load on the
computer is too high, or simply that it doesn't work well in a poorly
designed network?
YMMV. I like the portability of a softphone, but sound may jitter
because of other
Hi!
Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and
elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough
for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find
more detail on this debate?
- you comp needs to have its speakers turned on in order
Any idea if this applies to Mac OS X clients? We are a strictly Mac
company, and OS X's Unix core allows for preemptive multitasking. If
I am unhappy with the performance of the soft phones, I should be
able to tweak the priority of the phone so that it gets more compute
cycles.
I don't know
Ed,
There are two main drawbacks to the softphone, as I see it:
1.) User interface - The interface to the softphones is really less
than ideal. This includes the problem mentioned earlier about not
hearing ringing unless you have your headset on, dialing with the
mouse, not having
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 12:29:00PM -0400, Tom Rymes wrote:
Ed,
There are two main drawbacks to the softphone, as I see it:
1.) User interface - The interface to the softphones is really less
than ideal. This includes the problem mentioned earlier about not
hearing ringing unless you
1.) User interface - The interface to the softphones is really less
than ideal. This includes the problem mentioned earlier about not
hearing ringing unless you have your headset on, dialing with the
mouse, not having telephone service if your PC isn't on, etc. The
traditional telephone
On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Time Bandit wrote:
1.) User interface - The interface to the softphones is really less
than ideal. This includes the problem mentioned earlier about not
hearing ringing unless you have your headset on, dialing with the
mouse, not having telephone service if your PC
Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and
elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough
for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find
more detail on this debate?
Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Pastore
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:50 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SoftPhones: Bad, or just bad QoS?
Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and elsewhere
that softphones
Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and
elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough
for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find
more detail on this debate?
Search the list. there is been a lot of talk on this subject.
Try
Dear All,
there is a software phone that shows the extensions status when is
registered to Asterisk?
Regards,
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Hi,
can someone tell be about some good and free softphones?
Are they easy to use by non-tecnical users?
Can someone share their experience about the implementation of VoIP
softphones in a company? because usualy people dont want to make changes
in the way they work I would like to know a
I want to be able to make calls on my laptop, and
then have an * box, route the call via a proper phone line. Is the above
possible?
Angel Gabriel wrote:
I want to be able to make calls on my laptop, and then have an * box,
route the call via a proper phone line. Is the above possible?
Yes, assuming the two machines are connected on a network, nothing would
be simpler. You'll just need some kind of card in the * box to
65 matches
Mail list logo
