thought I would chime in ;-)
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_rxfax (alternative
Seems to be correct, or at least image corruption from a really crappy fax
reception. I know I've been receiving between 30-50 faxes a day with
app_rxfax without issue.
What versions of everything are you using? Using PRI? libtiff? spandsp?
asterisk? diagram? I can't get any faxes via
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_rxfax (alternative
topic:t38modem)
H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced
image
corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version
On 2005.01.07 09:42 Jeff wrote:
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was related to some
type of
'line noise' and that others successfully using the spandsp code
_might_ be
using T1/E1 rather than analog lines (1FL) but when I started testing
using
an old Fax machine plugged into a
On January 7, 2005 12:26 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote:
Seems to be correct, or at least image corruption from a really crappy
fax reception. I know I've been receiving between 30-50 faxes a day with
app_rxfax without issue.
What versions of everything are you using? Using PRI? libtiff?
Jeff wrote:
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was related to some type of
'line noise' and that others successfully using the spandsp code _might_ be
using T1/E1 rather than analog lines (1FL) but when I started testing using
an old Fax machine plugged into a station port with a six
On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
Since spandsp doesn't use ECM, what I'm about to say doesn't apply to
spandsp. If you receive truncated (versus corrupted) fax images from
spandsp, then I'm not sure what the problem would be. What I'm about
to say only applies to
I have used an analog trunk (FXO) AND a station (FXS) both on the same card.
I thought that it might be related to the hardware so I hooked up an old
Brother Intellifax 9000 on the station port. Both of these attempts had the
same problem.
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was
...
and thanks to others for trying.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_rxfax
Ryan wrote:
On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
Since spandsp doesn't use ECM, what I'm about to say doesn't apply to
spandsp. If you receive truncated (versus corrupted) fax images from
spandsp, then I'm not sure what the problem would be. What I'm about
to say only applies
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
you believe you have a good version of the TIFF library on your machine,
check you don't have any others. A *lot* of people have told
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Ryan wrote:
On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
Just to be clear. What I am getting is about the top inch of the fax and
that's all. The total size of the TIFF is ALWAYS about 3KB or less.
If your TIFF are consistently that
Nils Segerdahl wrote:
I suspected frame slips. But sound quality was ok. Everything was ok.
Except maybe to many interrupts on the line cards.
But when I changed my devicedriver to one that was more safe regarding
lost interrupts it worked like a charm.
Device driver? TDM device driver? Would
On Friday 07 January 2005 03:45 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
you believe you have a good version of the TIFF library on your machine,
check you don't have
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
Nils Segerdahl wrote:
I suspected frame slips. But sound quality was ok. Everything was ok.
Except maybe to many interrupts on the line cards.
But when I changed my devicedriver to one that was more safe regarding
lost interrupts it worked
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
Steve, when you say that some Canon fax machines disconnect during
negotiation, does this negotiation happen at the end of each page?
Michael Welter wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
Steve, when you say that some Canon fax machines disconnect during
negotiation, does this negotiation happen
17 matches
Mail list logo
