Hi, Brian:
Brian West wrote:
Matt,
I talk very openly about this issue. It was very rude of you to bring
this up. This plea was total bullshit. If you want to know the whole
story feel free to call me and talk about it. 918-424-9378... anyone
can call me and ask me questions about it.
What a waste of time...
dave
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:35 -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Brian West wrote:
And what was the purpose of this?
So that we would realize who we were talking to.
:)
-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Brian West wrote:
And what was the purpose of this?
So that we would realize who we were talking to.
:)
-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
Not at all! You apparently don't realize (sic) you're talking to is just
a subtle way of saying look me up! Matt was just nice enough to do the
leg work :-)
On 10/12/07, David Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What a waste of time...
dave
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:35 -0600, Stephen Bosch
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 14:32:38 Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
And your point, precisely, is what?
Someone who has a criminal record can't be a technical authority? Someone
can't have a criminal record without being a
On 10/9/07, Brian West wrote:
[...] All I did was click edit in frontpage and alert them
of anonymous publishing priv. were on their servers
and they called the FBI [...]
I believe you.
The astonishing security holes that were engineered
by MS so their web
did anyone think about how many concurrent call runs on DS3 and how may call
single asterisk instance can handle ?!
That board does not have any DSP, Who will do trans-coding ? echo
cancellation ?
Well, keep us update
2007/10/9, Tim King [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If it hasn't already been done I am
If it hasn't already been done I am looking to put together a team to write
drivers for this DS3 card to interface asterisk.
http://www.imagestream.com/PCI_921-CDS.html
The card itself seems reasonable and I believe we can make it work. As soon
as I have positive feedback to begin the
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are you
hoping to accomplish? There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth
of traffic... therefore, what good would this do?
On 10/9/07, Tim King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it hasn't already been done I am looking to
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
you hoping to accomplish?
I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a box
I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco 5xxx or
look at
A few SGI boxen with Numalink could probably handle it just fine.
Thanks,
Steve
Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
you hoping to accomplish? There is no way one system can handle a DS3s
worth of traffic... therefore, what good would this do?
It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue. The zaptel
framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.
On 10/9/07, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what
I did not look at the specs of the card but if it has inboard DSPs, it
may work just fine in a high end box.
Thanks,
Steve
Matt wrote:
It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue. The zaptel
framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.
On 10/9/07,
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:14:23 Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are you
hoping to accomplish? There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth
of traffic... therefore, what good would this do?
Whatever gave you the notion that a modern PC
http://www.imagestream.com/PCI_921-CDS.html
This card can do it. I have spoke with them about it and its very
capable of doing what is needed for a DS3 in a standard linux box.
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:14:23 Matt wrote:
Before
Patrick wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
you hoping to accomplish?
I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a box
I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:14:23 Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are you
hoping to accomplish? There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth
of traffic... therefore, what good would this do?
Whatever gave you
This looks very promising. All eggs in one basket, but promising...
Any idea on price?
The PCI 921-CDS utilizes the Mindspeed CX28500 chipset to provide
support for the card's host PCI bus interface, which can burst data at
speeds up to 780 Mbps, or 390 Mbps full duplex. The CX28500 also
On 10/9/07, Brian West wrote:
http://www.imagestream.com/PCI_921-CDS.html
[...]
off-topic :
I saw Imagestream at the Ohio Linuxfest a weekend ago.
Also picked up a few literature bags by Digium :-)
--
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:07 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DS3 Interface
On 10/9/07, Brian West wrote:
http://www.imagestream.com/PCI_921-CDS.html
[...]
off-topic :
I saw Imagestream at the Ohio Linuxfest a weekend ago.
Also picked up a few
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baji
Panchumarti
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:07 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DS3 Interface
On 10/9/07, Brian West wrote:
http://www.imagestream.com/PCI_921-CDS.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baji
Panchumarti
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:07 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DS3 Interface
On 10/9/07, Brian West wrote:
http
You apparently don't realize you're talking to. Thats ok, You keep
working on it from your angle. We are evaluating when the time is
right to implement this. We aren't doing this for Asterisk we are
doing it for FreeSWITCH.
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
Don't take it personally. I have been on this list about as long as
you. BKW (Next!) Ego can be good but let's not become egomaniacs
shall we?
I am not working on it from any angle, and would probably never
*entertain* using such a device.
I prefer tried and true DS3 MUXs such as the
BTW, this is the wrong list if it not for Asterisk. It has absolutely
nothing to do with Asterisk.
Please post to the appropriate FreeSwitch list.
Thanks again,
Steve Totaro
Brian West wrote:
You apparently don't realize you're talking to. Thats ok, You keep
working on it from your
Well we are plugging it in the OpenZAP abstraction layer we have
already started on. This is usable by Asterisk also so asterisk
would benefit from it.
http://fisheye.freeswitch.org/browse/OpenZAP
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
BTW, this is the wrong list if it not
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
On 10/9/07, Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You apparently don't realize you're talking to. Thats ok, You keep
working on it from your angle. We are evaluating when the time is right to
implement this. We aren't doing this for
And what was the purpose of this?
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
On 10/9/07, Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You apparently don't realize you're talking to. Thats ok, You
keep working on it from your angle. We are
Yes, I knew who I was talking to and now I know a little more about you
Matt, that was totally uncalled for.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
On 10/9/07, *Brian West* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You
Matt,
I talk very openly about this issue. It was very rude of you to
bring this up. This plea was total bullshit. If you want to know
the whole story feel free to call me and talk about it.
918-424-9378... anyone can call me and ask me questions about it.
The plea was a deal worked
On 10/9/07, Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
Hey,
I am not sure what your point is, are you trying to shame
West on this list with your post ?
He is a contributor to the asterisk movement, which is the
purpose of these lists.
This was uncalled for.
Perhaps it was uncalled for. However, if I were to consider using
FreeSwitch I would want to know who was/is behind it.
On 10/9/07, Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what was the purpose of this?
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Matt wrote:
On 10/9/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
Fascinating. Not really. Anyway, how is this related to Asterisk?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users
I'm number three on the dev team and not the soul person behind
FreeSWITCH. Its very uncalled for. You are dragging our project
thru the mud now also. Don't pass judgement on me. You sound quite
childish and waste my time. Never judge a man till you walk a day in
his shoes.
/b
On
Well hopefully people can read between the lines.. I have talked
about this issue in public many times and don't try to hide it but
the plea isn't how it went down.
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
Yes, I knew who I was talking to and now I know a little more about
you
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Brian West wrote:
I'm number three on the dev team and not the soul person behind FreeSWITCH.
Its very uncalled for. You are dragging our project thru the mud now also.
Don't pass judgement on me. You sound quite childish and waste my time.
Never judge a man till you
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
you hoping to accomplish? There is no way one system can handle a
DS3s worth of traffic... therefore, what good would this do?
I presume you can compare it with an ETSI C3
Wow. It shows that there is a lot of ignorance in the DOJ. They
should have thanked BW, not charged him. Thanks for blowing this way
off track Matt.
Tom
At 01:32 PM 10/9/2007, you wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 14:32:38 Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
And your point, precisely, is what?
Someone who has a criminal record can't be a technical authority? Someone
can't have a criminal record without being a scumbag? Or perhaps that you
I don't see how this is relevant to the discussion.
Zoa
Matt wrote:
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/WestPlea.htm
On 10/9/07, *Brian West* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You apparently don't realize you're talking to. Thats ok, You
keep working on
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 14:20:33 Brian West wrote:
I'm number three on the dev team and not the soul person behind
FreeSWITCH. Its very uncalled for. You are dragging our project
thru the mud now also. Don't pass judgement on me. You sound quite
childish and waste my time. Never judge
Hello Gentleman Ladies ,
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 14:20:33 Brian West wrote:
I'm number three on the dev team and not the soul person behind
FreeSWITCH. Its very uncalled for. You are dragging our project
thru the mud now also. Don't
I would recommend doing it on a 64bit platform for sure. Not sure
Asterisk has very many linger issues on 64bit... I know I run it on
64bit without too much drama.
/b
On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Please , step back form the keyboard , take a deep
43 matches
Mail list logo
