Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-08-01 Thread D Tucny
On 24 July 2012 15:18, Hans Witvliet aster...@a-domani.nl wrote: On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:23 -0400, Tom Browning wrote: Any tips on solving the following performance conundrum: Asterisk 1.8.12.2 running on HP DL360 G5 and G7s tcpdump running to capture UDP 5060/SIP signaling to .pcap

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-08-01 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 19:39 +0800, D Tucny wrote: snip For reference... In my opinion HP servers should never be bought without the battery or alternative, they shouldn't even be offered for sale without it... In my case, our purchase department changed our order. They thought in their

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-08-01 Thread Steven Howes
On 1 Aug 2012, at 12:39, D Tucny wrote: HP refuse to let you put your data at risk, refusing to activate write caching without a charged battery attached or NV cache. I personally would like to have the option to override things like this at my own risk, but, HP don't give you that

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-07-25 Thread Tom Browning
You might want to check/compare disk-io throughput on your G5 vs G7. Just a thought Thanks Hans, I will do some disk benchmarking just in case. I do know that I/O wait on the G7s has been an order of magnitude less than the G5s under the same load so I *think* the fancier raid device and

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-07-24 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 23:23 -0400, Tom Browning wrote: Any tips on solving the following performance conundrum: Asterisk 1.8.12.2 running on HP DL360 G5 and G7s tcpdump running to capture UDP 5060/SIP signaling to .pcap files All calls are ultimately B2BUA client - asterisk - PSTN

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-07-22 Thread Tom Browning
I think I may have found the issue affecting our HP DL360 G7s (but I don't begin to understand why this problem does not happen on our HP DL360 G5 with a slower disk subsystem). Recap: Running tcpdump on SIP UDP along with Asterisk 1.8.* causes Autodestruct ... owner in place ... BYE messages

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-06-17 Thread Tom Browning
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Andrew Joakimsen joakim...@gmail.com wrote: Make sure you have installed Proliant Support Pack (PSP) then you can monitor the system through HP System Management Homepage (SMH) HP publishes drivers for the network cards. I've never used them as the built in

[asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Browning
Any tips on solving the following performance conundrum: Asterisk 1.8.12.2 running on HP DL360 G5 and G7s tcpdump running to capture UDP 5060/SIP signaling to .pcap files All calls are ultimately B2BUA client - asterisk - PSTN Media stays on Asterisk at all times AGI script has exit handler

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-06-03 Thread Steve Edwards
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Tom Browning wrote: AGI script has exit handler that connects and updates an external database upon BYE from either side. I know that if exit handler hangs around too long, Bad Things (tm) will happen. One of the systems I coded uses an AGI at call completion to update

Re: [asterisk-users] HP DL360 G5 better than HP DL360 G7 ?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Browning
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com wrote: This AGI (which should only take about 20 seconds) occasionally takes a minute or 3 to complete, but it does complete. You should also be seeing the Autodestruct message? I put a sleep 60 in my exit handler and can