Thanks George
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of George Joseph
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 8:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two
Thank you George
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of George Joseph
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 8:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is it possible to have two
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Dan Cropp wrote:
> Thank you George.
>
>
>
> I will pass along the rfc information to those responsible for the other
> switch.
>
>
>
> I missed the match_header addition to Asterisk.
>
> Unfortunately, the only header field that seems
Thank you George.
I will pass along the rfc information to those responsible for the other switch.
I missed the match_header addition to Asterisk.
Unfortunately, the only header field that seems appropriate is the To header.
On a separate box I am now trying to configure the endpoint
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Dan Cropp wrote:
> Thanks George
>
>
>
> I originally didn’t have the 1002@ for the identify. Changed that when
> things were not working. I changed it back.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, the system I am connecting with doesn’t seem to support the
>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Dan Cropp wrote:
> Thanks George
>
> I originally didn’t have the 1002@ for the identify. Changed that when
> things were not working. I changed it back.
>
> Unfortunately, the system I am connecting with doesn’t seem to support
> the line support. Looking
Thanks George
I originally didn’t have the 1002@ for the identify. Changed that when things
were not working. I changed it back.
Unfortunately, the system I am connecting with doesn’t seem to support the line
support. Looking at the SIP packets, I see Asterisk send it. Unfortunately,
they
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Dan Cropp wrote:
> Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the
> existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip
> performing similar work.
>
>
>
> For PJSIP…
>
> I currently have an
Currently using PJSIP. First, they want me to get this working with the
existing PJSIP configuration, but then setup a second box using chan_sip
performing similar work.
For PJSIP...
I currently have an endpoint configured to a system using IP based
authentication. It is configured with a