To: asterisk-users
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OSLEC and zaptel-1.4.5.1
Hi Alan.
I've installed OSLEC with zaptel-1.4.5.1 applying the patches made for the
1.4 version and I have had the same problem.
Looking at the compiler options I've found that the symbol ECHO_CAN_FROMENV
is defined by default
Most of thread snipped.
On 10/24/07, marcotasto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some days ago I've sent to David Rowe a little patch that preserves the echo
cancel
status between calls.
Surely this is only appropriate where you have a local analogue device
that is unchanging - If you retained the
Steve Davies wrote:
Most of thread snipped.
On 10/24/07, marcotasto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some days ago I've sent to David Rowe a little patch that preserves the echo
cancel
status between calls.
Surely this is only appropriate where you have a local analogue device
that is
On 10/24/07, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And anyone who has echo problems with x100p or other analogue cards
should really give this a try. Most of the experiences I have read about
have been very positive. Mine also :-)
Any in case anyone's wondering if it's too CPU intensive for
Hi Steve.
What I did was to allocate one EC instance the first time a channel asks for it
and reuse the same memory area for the same channel every time a new call is
coming.
The memory is then freed when the channel is unloaded.
I've done this with my TDM400P in mind and I don't know what
Hi all,
After reading great things about the OSLEC Echo Canceller
(http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec) and seeing the reactions of
people who have tried it on a recent Trixbox thread
(http://www.trixbox.org/forums/trixbox-forums/open-discussion/need-people-echo-problems),
it sounds like
Replies/Comments inline...
Alan Lord wrote:
Hi all,
After reading great things about the OSLEC Echo Canceller
(http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec) and seeing the reactions of
people who have tried it on a recent Trixbox thread
Dave Fullerton wrote:
Replies/Comments inline...
Ditto :-)
Alan Lord wrote:
Hi all,
After reading great things about the OSLEC Echo Canceller
(http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec) and seeing the reactions of
people who have tried it on a recent Trixbox thread
Hi Alan.
I've installed OSLEC with zaptel-1.4.5.1 applying the patches made for the 1.4
version and I have had the same problem.
Looking at the compiler options I've found that the symbol ECHO_CAN_FROMENV is
defined by default and this prevents the echo selection from zconfig.h.
I've solved
marcotasto wrote:
Hi Alan.
I've installed OSLEC with zaptel-1.4.5.1 applying the patches made for the
1.4 version and I have had the same problem.
Looking at the compiler options I've found that the symbol ECHO_CAN_FROMENV
is defined by default and this prevents the echo selection from
marcotasto wrote:
Hi Alan.
I've installed OSLEC with zaptel-1.4.5.1 applying the patches made for the
1.4 version and I have had the same problem.
Looking at the compiler options I've found that the symbol ECHO_CAN_FROMENV
is defined by default and this prevents the echo selection from
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:03:01PM +0100, Alan Lord wrote:
Hi all,
After reading great things about the OSLEC Echo Canceller
(http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec) and seeing the reactions of
people who have tried it on a recent Trixbox thread
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:20:31PM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
This looks like it is isolated to 1.4.5.x.
Right.
It looks like digium added
Just to set the record straight, it was me who added it, and thus caused
hte changed behaviour you noticed here. The behaviour was restored in later
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:20:31PM -0400, Dave Fullerton wrote:
This looks like it is isolated to 1.4.5.x.
Right.
It looks like digium added
Just to set the record straight, it was me who added it, and thus caused
hte changed behaviour you noticed here. The
Alan,
I'm glad to see that you are able to run zaptel and OSLEC following my tweak!
Some days ago I've sent to David Rowe a little patch that preserves the echo
cancel status between calls.
I'm using it since several weeks with my TDM400P home based PBX and I think
that's a really effective
15 matches
Mail list logo
