Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 05/06/2012 01:39 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: 800 SIP phones on one server? I wouldn't want to do it. Add a SIP proxy to your design and have it handle all your SIP. Then you can load balance across multiple asterisk boxes. You'll be thankful you did this at the start, as it will allow you to

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-11 Thread Alex Balashov
Are you certain that this wouldn't be an issue if the phones had low re-registration intervals? Historically, I've seen the Asterisk registrar faceplant with throughput in excess of 5-7 registrations/sec, though I have no idea as to whether that holds true of newer releases. -- This message

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 05/11/2012 04:53 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Are you certain that this wouldn't be an issue if the phones had low re-registration intervals? Historically, I've seen the Asterisk registrar faceplant with throughput in excess of 5-7 registrations/sec, though I have no idea as to whether that

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-09 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
Ext. 2003 From: Chad Wallace cwall...@lodgingcompany.com Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 8:13 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture. On Mon, 07 May 2012 06:40:46

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-08 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 02:49 +0530, Mitul Limbani wrote: For 100% High Availibility and Hot Failover, I would recommend one of those Red-fone Fonebridges. Also getting 800 Phones all register on single server is crazy, add a SIP proxy to distribute load evenly between 2 Ast boxes. For

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-08 Thread Chad Wallace
On Mon, 07 May 2012 06:40:46 -0600 Nunya Biznatch aster...@ihearbanjos.com wrote: I need to plan to use FreePBX on all Asterisk Servers, but I don't intend to install it until I'm in regular MAC maintenance mode. It is ashame you are going this far with your setup to rely on FreePBX.

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-08 Thread Anton Kvashenkin
Don't blame me guys, but if you are a new to VOIP and aint't using asterisk for a while, checkout freeswitch (freeswitch.org). Also do not forget at least about this http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.6.x/load_balancer.html for loadbalance to your pbx boxes. Just my 2 cents. 2012/5/9

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Edwards
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Nunya Biznatch wrote: Thanks for the info. It got me digging deeper. I definitely don't want to screw this one up, but I've got to pinch pennies to get this done, so don't want to buy anything that would just be nice to have. ...but if I have to get it, that's what I'll

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Nunya Biznatch
Finally, I'll have a Windows-based workstation that will be used to remote into all the services, for administration, etc... Why? Unfortunately, the existing PBX Administration Software only works on WinBloze. I'm stuck with it until I can decommission it. I need to plan to use FreePBX

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Edwards
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Nunya Biznatch wrote: It is my intention to do everything from the command line. However, there will be times when I'll have Interns coming in and doing some of the MAC activities, and I thought this might be an easier way for the day to day to get done. Sounds like a

[asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-06 Thread Nunya Biznatch
I'm about to receive approval to design and deploy an Asterisk-based phone system for my company. I will immediately have to start writing specifications. I'm working on the hardware design and the architecture right now. I'd like a second, third, fourth, 1,000th opinion. 800 SIP phones. All

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-06 Thread Paul Belanger
On 12-05-06 02:00 PM, Nunya Biznatch wrote: I'm about to receive approval to design and deploy an Asterisk-based phone system for my company. I will immediately have to start writing specifications. I'm working on the hardware design and the architecture right now. I'd like a second, third,

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-06 Thread Mitul Limbani
For 100% High Availibility and Hot Failover, I would recommend one of those Red-fone Fonebridges. Also getting 800 Phones all register on single server is crazy, add a SIP proxy to distribute load evenly between 2 Ast boxes. For Wireless you might consider using DECT phones from Snom instead of

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-06 Thread Antonio Goméz Soto
I have deployed multiple installations with 1500 phones per server using standard HP DL-380's. It's not that crazy. They can handle it pretty easily. Antonio. Op 06-05-12 23:19, Mitul Limbani schreef: For 100% High Availibility and Hot Failover, I would recommend one of those Red-fone

Re: [asterisk-users] Replacing PBX with Asterisk, need feedback on my new architecture.

2012-05-06 Thread Nunya Biznatch
Thanks for the info. It got me digging deeper. I definitely don't want to screw this one up, but I've got to pinch pennies to get this done, so don't want to buy anything that would just be nice to have. ...but if I have to get it, that's what I'll do. Have any of you seen this?