On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:24 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now.
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production?
(besides the several MB of yum
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:24 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
[snip]
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production?
(besides the several MB of yum updates daily, which to me is a good thing).
Steve,
Fedora 7
On 8/27/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I use CentOS (when I don't care about support) or RHEL (when
support is important to me) as my preferred server distribution, simply
because they guarantee to have *years* worth (at least five years!) of
security updates, even if I
Steve Totaro wrote:
But in all reality, value added features such as support and automatic
updates aside, is there really a mainstream flavor of Linux that is
better or worse for running Asterisk (or other apps for that matter)?
I have had equal luck with all that I have played with (but
I concur, Centos 4.4 FTW. ^^
-- Original Message --
From: Edgar Guadamuz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:50:51 -0600
I have used CentOS and it
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:31:15AM -0600, Anthony Francis wrote:
I concur, Centos 4.4 FTW. ^^
Centos 4.4, as in not the latest, and already hald the packages are not
in the repositories? Any specific reason you avoid Centos 4.5? Centos5?
Any specific reason to keep using something that is still
. . .
Personally I recommend SuSE Linux. OpenSuSE without the GUI installed
will do just fine. If you want to buy SLES that's fine, but I really
don't see the value in it.
The value would be live support and access to online updates. Courtesy
(for the price) of Novell.
There are, of
On 8/25/07, Joe Acquisto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. . .
Personally I recommend SuSE Linux. OpenSuSE without the GUI installed
will do just fine. If you want to buy SLES that's fine, but I really
don't see the value in it.
The value would be live support and access to online updates.
. . .
The value would be live support and access to online updates.
Courtesy (for the price) of Novell.
There are, of course, some differences between OpenSuse and SLES. I've run
Asterisk on SLES 9 and SLES 10 without problems.
Your View/Mileage May Vary.
joe a.
With OpenSuSE you
Joe Acquisto wrote:
. . .
The value would be live support and access to online updates.
Courtesy (for the price) of Novell.
There are, of course, some differences between OpenSuse and SLES. I've run
Asterisk on SLES 9 and SLES 10 without problems.
Your
. . .
Besides naming a flavor and saying It is the best, can someone add a
few statements as to why, which will obviously have to compare the other
flavors.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
I'd have to review the entire thread to see if anyone actually claimed any
flavor was best, but
can point
Joe Acquisto wrote:
. . .
Besides naming a flavor and saying It is the best, can someone add a
few statements as to why, which will obviously have to compare the other
flavors.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
I'd have to review the entire thread to see if anyone actually claimed any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Totaro wrote:
I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now.
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production?
(besides the
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now.
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production?
(besides the several
Matt Riddell wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now.
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production?
(besides the several MB of yum updates
What Digium is using is rpath, RHEL /Centos
On 8/25/07, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Riddell wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now.
Besides a knee jerk reaction that Fedora Sucks, can someone give a
real argument
Dear
which Linux version would be fine for asterisk CentOS 5.0 or
Debian 4.0 or RHEL 4.0
Regards
Satish patel
-
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder
CentOS and RHEL are the same thing. One uses the RedHat trademark, the
other doesnt. One is expensive, the other isn't. I don't like to
recommend either because I just don't like RedHat's business
practices.
Personally I recommend SuSE Linux. OpenSuSE without the GUI installed
will do just fine.
I have used CentOS and it works fine and it is easy to install. I know
that Debian is a little more complicated to install Asterisk and some
teatures on Debian.
I'd choice CentOS 4.2 or 4.4, as my personal preference.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
19 matches
Mail list logo
