Damon Estep wrote:
Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not be a
member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?
For example;
Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23
Group 2 = channels 1 to 12
Group 3 = channels 13 to 23
The purpose is to restrict the number of
Damon Estep wrote:
Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not
be a
member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?
For example;
Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23
Group 2 = channels 1 to 12
Group 3 = channels 13 to 23
The purpose is to
Damon Estep wrote:
Damon Estep wrote:
Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not
be a
member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?
For example;
Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23
Group 2 = channels 1 to 12
Group 3 = channels 13 to 23
The purpose is to restrict
