Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-30 Thread Alex Balashov
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: If you want proper (T.38) fax support then pick up a Cisco AS53xx, AS54xx, AS58xx, 2600, 3600, 7200. You need IOS 12.1 or above, double check Cisco for specific WIC, RAM and other misc. requirements of course! ... even then, if you're running

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-30 Thread randulo
I was not clear. I removed the PDF conversion only because the faxes were ot being recived correctly in most cases. The PDF conversion worked fine, but who needs a bunch of blank PDF? May as well have blank TIFF :) On 5/29/07, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: randulo wrote: All spam faxes

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-29 Thread randulo
So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it works, it doesn't work, it kinda sorta works when it's not raining out side. Everything under the rainbow. I have comiled stats on my asterisk pbx over the last three years. All spam faxes arrive perfectly readable. For

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-29 Thread Doug Lytle
randulo wrote: All spam faxes arrive perfectly readable. For actual documents faxed by customers, one in 5 work. Because of this I removed the PDF Man that's awful! My experience is just the opposite. I might have a bad fax2pdf conversion once a month. I review the pdfs being archived on

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-29 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception I use Asterisk and Hylafax and iaxmodem to send 600+ faxes per week with no baby sitting, I receive about 20 and it requires no baby sitting Hylafax and iaxmodem with Asterisk works

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread shadowym
Anybody?? -Original Message- From: shadowym [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:35 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it works, it

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread Steve Totaro
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 11:20 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception Anybody?? -Original Message- From: shadowym [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:35 AM To: asterisk

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread shadowym
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception Someone already answered this question. The answer is no, it does not work by your definition of production ready. Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com KB3OPB

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread Doug Lytle
Doug Lytle wrote: shadowym wrote: So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it As it has been said many many times before, Fax detection is an art and most of the time is not reliable. Faxing on the other hand, using iaxmodem along with HylaFAX+ works very

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
On 5/24/07, shadowym [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it works, it doesn't work, it kinda sorta works when it's not raining out side. Everything under the rainbow. What's the bottom line with recent updates on 1.2.x? Is it

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread Duncan Turnbull
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shadowym Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2007 7:34 a.m. To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception Sorry but I must have missed it if someone else responded

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread shadowym
Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception I use Asterisk and Hylafax and iaxmodem to send 600+ faxes per week with no baby sitting, I receive about 20 and it requires no baby sitting Hylafax and iaxmodem with Asterisk works very well - check out iaxmodem and hylafax

RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-28 Thread Paul Hales
-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception I use Asterisk and Hylafax and iaxmodem to send 600+ faxes per week with no baby sitting, I receive about 20 and it requires no baby sitting Hylafax and iaxmodem with Asterisk works very well - check out iaxmodem

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-24 Thread mail-lists
shadowym wrote: So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it works, it doesn't work, it kinda sorta works when it's not raining out side. Everything under the rainbow. What's the bottom line with recent updates on 1.2.x? Is it production ready for fax? By

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-24 Thread Doug Lytle
shadowym wrote: So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it As it has been said many many times before, Fax detection is an art and most of the time is not reliable. Faxing on the other hand, using iaxmodem along with HylaFAX+ works very well. Search the

Re: [asterisk-users] Bottom line on fax reception

2007-05-24 Thread Alex Balashov
On Thu, 24 May 2007, shadowym wrote: So what is the bottom line? Does it work or not. I've heard stories it works, it doesn't work, it kinda sorta works when it's not raining out side. Everything under the rainbow. If you're talking about running it as analog pass-thru over G.711u over